Comments:[Add New]
October 5th, 2006 at 04:45:04  From: Fallaci Admirer
Ground invasion will though
Iraq battle phase deaths were 200, occupation deaths are 70 per month. The drivers of occupation deaths are foreign Sunni Arab fighters and Sunni Shiite clash in Iraq. Both won't happen in Iran, since Iranians won't allow Sunni Arab fighters nor do they have the clash. So if we invade Iran we cut the Iranian supply of Iraq and if we leave Iraq we cut our casualties after an initial bump up. This then positions our army on the Pakistan border to pressure them to give up their nukes as well.
October 5th, 2006 at 05:30:09  From: 
Just like the 2800 dead in WTC sacrificed for the pleasure of Neocon scum to kick start their war on the planet. Killing others seems to be the only preoccupation of the 'Chosen Tribe' throughout the history.
October 5th, 2006 at 06:16:21  From: 
British Find No Evidence Of Arms Traffic From Iran
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/10/03/AR2006100301577_pf.html
October 5th, 2006 at 07:44:53  From: Scott 1
Fallaci, go round up your militia and get to it. Show the world how easily you can occupy a piece of Iranian territory, and maybe some will follow your lead. Hurry, you're running out of time!
October 5th, 2006 at 07:59:55  From: Fallaci Admirer
Scott l
The Mideast Minute Men we could call them? What about you Scott, do you want to join? You can be a Captain of the Minute Men. We are running out of time. Bush will likely strike Iran with air power only. He may hope that will give a warning to North Korea and Pakistan of what a US air strike is like.
October 5th, 2006 at 10:35:47  From: gregdn
Fallaci Admirer
The days of us pushing around weak powers are over. Attacking Iran and/or Pakistan would be foolish in the extreme because they can fight back.
October 5th, 2006 at 11:07:09  From: 
Don't talk, just go enlist to show the world you dare to die for Bush gang.
October 5th, 2006 at 11:35:51  From: 
N. Korea has a bomb, doesn't get bombed. (see MAD theory). NPT signers get to have civilian N power (so do non-signers India, Paki and Is-unreal). Nuclear energy burns less oil, so there is more to sell, keeping price down, to China and US, etc. Faulty logic?
October 5th, 2006 at 13:03:35  From: Fallaci Admirer
Faulty logic?
Not for us, but it is for them. Pakistan got the bomb in May 98. Al Qaeda attacked our embassy in Aug 98. Pakistan attacked India in 1999 when both had the bomb. That was Musharraf's idea. Musharraf pretended the Pakistani troops were terrorists and wouldn't accept back their dead bodies from India. Al Qaeda attacked the Cole in 2000. All through these years, Pakistan was talking to US and IMF on refinancing its debt. Musharraf said he felt US owed Pakistan for opposing Soviets in 80's and, in effect, disliked us extremely for dropping them. Mush also called saying Pakistan's bomb was Muslim racist in his book. On Sep 11, 2001, Pakistan had 38 billion in debt including to IMF and World Bank. US told them they couldn't refinance it unless they gave up their nukes perhaps, Pakistan was under sanctions. On 9-13, General Ahmed of ISI and Armitage got into a shouting match it appears. What did Ahemd say? Give us money if you want the terrorism to stop? Pakistan has gotten over 4 billion since 9-11 and refinanced its debt. Armitage promised them F16s in 1988/89 and they resented they hadn't gotten them. Frontline did a special this week, see their webpage, that basically showed the Taliban have killed the Tribal Leaders in Waziristan that Mush said made the deal not the Taliban. They showed Mush saying two different things in the same interview. In their minds, their nuke let them attack India, Musharraf admits that. On 9-11, they either gave up their nukes to refinance or let al Qaeda attack us and charge protection money is one interpretation. Their logic means we have to denuke them now.
October 5th, 2006 at 13:06:48  From: Fallaci Admirer
gregdn "They can fight back"
The reply to "Faulty logic" address this. They got a nuke and attacked India in 1999. MAD says nuclear powers won't fight. Instead Pakistan got a nuke in May 98 and unleashed terrorist attacks and their own military pretending to be terrorists in every year since. That includes every year since 9-11, since as Frontline shows they are giving money they get from us to the Taliban who are fighting us with al Qaeda. Their concept of war is that their people are not productive and they have to attack us until we pay them money. Their concept is if we kill their people its less people to share the protection money they make us pay them.
October 5th, 2006 at 14:46:49  From: 
Comverse Technology Inc (Israeli Spies)
Comverse chief tried to bribe colleague to take blame, US says
October 5th, 2006 at 19:22:28  From: Scott 1
Fallaci, Mutual Assured Destruction implies if attacked with nukes, retaliation will be likewise. MAD never kept the US and USSR from engaging in hostiles, operatives clashed in Korea, Vietnam, Afghanistan, and probably many places never publicly revealed. Pakistan's nuclear arsenal was created to balance that of India, it has not eliminated incursions from either side, but probably has stopped them from escalating into more serious conflicts.
October 5th, 2006 at 19:38:09  From: Dmaker
You mean that they have lost control of this fuking invasion and for the usa to start piking coks to fuck the ass of the american canon meat in your fogiest idea do you think is posible that the usa can fight another invasion now think about the in home politics and the ending of the canon meat in iraq ,afganistan,sudan and others but this usa is loosing total control THE FUCKING DISOLVENCY OF THE USA
Add Comment:
Name:
Location:
Subject:
Message:
Verification Code
Verification Code: