Breaking News, Top Breaking News, Liberal News
FORUMS | BLOG | EDITORIALS | ARTS Liberal news Liberal News

MAIN PAGE

Editions


Raw Story Midday
Raw Story Evening

Sections


Arts
Editorials
-April Editorials

-Feb/Mar Editorials

Editors' Blog
Archives

Community


Raw Story Forums
Favorite Links
Logo Shop
Raw Shop

Contact

Contact us
Link to us
Advertise

About

About Us
Privacy Policy
Site Map

UK'S MUTED DISSIDENCE
Where are all the British blogs?

By James Clasper
RAW STORY COLUMNIST

“In our time,” wrote George Orwell, “political speech and writing are largely the defense of the indefensible.” One wonders what Orwell would have made of the rapid ascendancy of the Web log. For few can deny that, in the intoxicating era since Islamist terrorists declared war on the West, the blog has radically altered American political culture.

Advertisement


In the aftermath of the Sept. 11 attacks, hundreds of blogs focused solely on the war, grappling with first-person accounts from New York and Washington, D.C., reports from Afghanistan, and commentary about the shifting face of American foreign policy. As interest in the Bush administration’s war on terror has waxed and waned — replaced by concerns about the economy and attention to an impending presidential election — the “blogosphere” has flexed its muscles and focused on domestic politics.

Today, some of the most prolific American blogs have readerships in the hundreds of thousands, enabling them to punch well above their weight in three critical ways: by bypassing the editorial boards of the mainstream press and writing directly to their audience, by skewering the media and leaving no misguided opinion or erroneous press report unchecked, and by goading the mainstream media into pursuing political stories that fly below the radar.
For example, so quick were some blogs to pick up on Sen. Trent Lott’s thinly veiled advocacy of racial segregation last year that the controversy was injected into the mainstream media, where it gathered steam and led to Lott’s resignation.

More recently, the critical examination of President Bush’s National Guard service was ignited by evidence produced by the blog Calpundit. Thus, in a feverish election year in which the votes of many Libertarians and socially liberal, pro-war voters remain up for grabs, the most influential blogs likely will sway the hearts and minds of many impressionable swing voters between now and November.

In Britain, however, things are quite different. Although British blogging slowly has caught on, and a large number of blogs also emerged soon after Sept. 11 (including some started by expatriate Americans providing their own trenchant analysis of allied foreign policy and Fleet Street’s kaleidoscopic dissection of the war on terror), no British blog yet can claim to be as important an influence on domestic political debate as the American analogues.

But that might be changing. In the past six months, several British think tanks, politicians, and newspaper columnists (the Daily Mail’s Melanie Phillips and The Independent’s Johann Hari) have started blogging. Mimicking the Stateside success of bloggers-cum-professors Glenn Reynolds and Eugene Volokh, a University of Manchester professor of government Norman Geras, has seen his profile rise recently, as have columnist Stephen Pollard, conservative commentator Peter Cuthbertson, and the group blogs Harry’s Place and Vox Politics.

The question is: Will this emerging echelon of British blogging be able to shape political debate in as indomitable manner as the likes of Mickey Kaus, Josh Marshall, and Andrew Sullivan in the United States? Several impediments stand in the British blogosphere’s way.

First, given the traditional left-liberalism of the American media, the blog proved to be the ideal vehicle for paranoid right-wingers to attack perceived media bias. Not to be outdone, liberal blogs retaliated with their own exposure of slanted news coverage. But in Britain, a plethora of daily newspapers already cover the full spectrum of political thought and make no pretence toward objectivity, thus prohibiting the broader appeal of a subversive blogosphere. In other words, if you don’t like what The Guardian thinks about the proposed European Union constitution or the occupation of Iraq, you can find a different perspective in The Daily Telegraph.

Second, no issue has dominated a nation’s political and intellectual landscape in recent years as dramatically as the Sept. 11 attacks in the United States. If the traumatic events of 2½ years ago provided the spark for the rapid rise of the American political blogosphere, the Bush administration’s war on terror and the fierce debates that followed merely added fuel to the fire of American bloggers’ activity.

By contrast, the British public’s response to the war on terror has been less polarized and its political debate less passionate than America’s. Consequently, the interest in and the influence of British blogs have been substantially weaker.

Although such issues as Britain’s continued presence in the Middle East and a closely fought general election next year could raise their profile, without a national trauma as galvanizing as the Sept. 11 attacks and a controversial foreign policy response to match it, British political blogs are unlikely to reach beyond a niche audience.

Finally, perhaps the greatest impediment to the success and influence of political blogs is good, old-fashioned British cynicism. “Why would anyone want the cyberspace equivalent of being trapped with the pub bore as he details his enlightened opinions on everything from Iraq to the [London traffic] congestion charge?” asked The Guardian’s Matthew Tempest last year, from deep within a glass house.

Yet, why on earth would anyone want an intellectual diet consisting solely of the self-righteous platitudes of The Guardian and The Independent or the right-wing bromides of The Daily Telegraph and The Times, to say nothing of the BBC’s condescension or the titillating trash of cable and satellite news?

But that’s apparently the way people like it. In a recent discussion in The Guardian, popular blogger Rhodri Marsden admitted that her aim is to “write about mundane stuff in a way that would make entertaining reading,” before adding tellingly that, “If you try and write about the news, you’ll inevitably come across like a third-rate leader-page columnist.”

No wonder much of the British blogosphere is dull, prosaic and disenchanting. Marsden’s attitude is simply anathema to the thousands of bloggers whose ideas and opinions and desire to connect with others are shaping the political and intellectual current of modern America. Regrettably, as long as blogging is perceived as little more than a vanity project for verbose technophiles, or as a vehicle for sharing our most meaningless dear-diary observations, British political debate surely will suffer.

The Raw Story is the liberal alternative to Drudge, culling and composing progressive breaking news from around the world. Our main page and story index can be found here.

The author can be reached at: jamesclasper@hotmail.com.

Help us help you. Take this three-minute survey to help us get better ads.


Advertisement
Advertisement
Copyright © 2004 by Raw Story Media. All rights reserved. | Site map | Privacy policy