Breaking News, Top Breaking News, Liberal News
DISCUSSION FORUMS | BLOG | EDITORIALS Liberal news Liberal News

MAIN PAGE

Features

Liberal News
Midday | Evening
Editorials | Archives
Editors' Blog

Community

Liberal news
Blue Lemur Blogs
-Your free blog!
Discussion Forums

Favorite Links
Logo & Raw Shop

Contact

Contact | Link to us
Advertise
| Join

About

About Us
Privacy | Site Map

GOT CHURCH?
Goodbye secularism: A crusade for a church-state marriage

By Michael C. Sherrin | RAW STORY CONTRIBUTOR

Every good super-villain knows to complete your master plan, you need a diversion. With terrorism lurking in every corner, few people have noticed the slow but certain transformation America is enduring. Since 2001, openly evangelical President George W. Bush and other Republican leaders have begun dismantling the checks and balances meant to keep certain influences from governing the government.

Advertisement


The separation of church and state, as we know it, may soon be thing of the past.
Though it has a consistent history, the separation of church and state has long been attacked as a misinterpretion of the Constitution. The First Amendment says, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.”

President James Madison wrote in an 1819 letter “[T]he number, the industry and the morality of the priesthood, and the devotion of the people have been manifestly increased by the total separation of the church and state.” As President, Madison vetoed at least four bills because he believed they violated the religious freedom ordered by the First Amendment. Moreover, President Thomas Jefferson consulted with his attorney general, Levi Lincoln, before drafting a letter to the Danbury Baptists where he referred to a “wall of separation between church and state.” Court cases over the past one hundred years have continuously upheld a separate church and state.

Nevertheless, recent moves by the Religious Right and its control over the Republican Party have shown how vulnerable centuries of precedent can be. The Texas Republican Platform of 2004 is almost a wish-list of the Religious Right. The Platform calls the “United States of America a Christian Nation” and promises to “dispel the myth of the separation of church and state.”

House Majority Leader, Tom DeLay (R-Texas) said, “I don't believe there is a separation of church and state” at a Congressional luncheon on July, 2001.
Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia said on January 12th, 2003 at a Religious Freedom event that the 9th Circuit decision to remove “under God” from the Pledge of Allegiance showed how the courts were misinterpreting the First Amendment to “exclude God from the public forums and from political life.”

President Bush has even circumvented checks and balances to put anti-secular Judges in power. Bush appointed William Pryor to the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals during a Congressional recess, thus avoiding Congress’s approval (Democrats were blocking Pryor’s appointment amid Republican charges that their motives were anti-catholic). Pryor was the Alabama attorney general who defended Judge Roy Moore of the Ten Commandments at the court house. On April 12, 1997, in Moore’s defense, Pryor said “God has chosen, through his son Jesus Christ, this time, this place for all Christians Protestants, Catholics and Orthodox to save our country and save our courts.”

10th Circuit appointee Michael McConnell said “Freedom flourishes when man is subordinate to God.” James Leon Holmes’s appointment to the federal court in Arkansas passed the Senate in spite of his saying “The wife is subordinate to herself and to her husband,” in a 1997 article. He also said, “Christianity transcends the political order and cannot be subordinated to the political order” in a 2002 address to the Society of Catholic Social Scientists.

If given another four years, Bush will have the opportunity to appoint up to four Supreme Court judges.

As if filling the courts with extreme conservatives wasn’t enough, Republicans have pushed legislation either striping the judiciary of its power or blatantly violating the separation of church and state. Same-sex marriage is the most prominent example. After two state Supreme Courts (Hawaii and Massachusetts) have ruled same-sex marriages are required by their state constitutions, conservatives have fought for amendments to the United States constitution defining marriage.

When the Federal Marriage Amendment failed to pass, the House passed the Marriage Protection Act stripping the federal judiciary from hearing any challenge to the Defense of Marriage Act (the law allowing states to ban same-sex marriage).
Championed by the aforementioned ex-Judge Moore and televangelist Pat Robertson, the Constitutional Restoration Act of 2004 (H.R. 3799) strips the entire judiciary from ruling on cases regarding religion.

As written in the bill, the Act says, “Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, the Supreme Court shall not have jurisdiction to review, by appeal, writ of certiorari, or otherwise, any matter to the extent that relief is sought against an element of Federal, State, or local government, or against an officer of Federal, State, or local government (whether or not acting in official personal capacity), by reason of that element’s or officer’s acknowledgment of God as the sovereign source of law, liberty, or government.”

This means any “element of Federal, State, or local government” can pass laws favoring God and other religious beliefs without checks and balances. “God [is] the sovereign source of law, liberty, or government.”

The Texas Republican Platform shows what the Religious Right wants, and explains major aspects of the Bush Presidency thus far. School vouchers allow tax money to pay for parochial schools. Further, the Texas Platform calls for the abolishment of the Department of Education without moving its responsibilities to any other government body (there are always school vouchers for parochial schools).

They call for continuation of the already passed Faith-Based Initiative that allows religious institutions to receive federal funding while continuing to discriminate for religious reasons. Texas also wants “free speech for the clergy” by allowing them to address political issues without loosing tax-exemption status. A similar bill failed in Congress this year.

Homosexuals, pro-choice women, and members of any religious group, agnostics, atheists or others aside from the extreme Religious Right (the Religious Right is the minority, I might note) should fear for their freedoms. If given them, Bush’s next four years will be unchecked by another election.

The only people really safe are the Jews. Jews must be in control of Israel in order for Jesus to return. At that point, two thirds of the Jews will die and the rest will enter Heaven having accepted Jesus as their savior. This may work. But then, of course, gambling is a sin.

For additional information, go to: http://www.4religious-right.info/index.html and http://www.au.org/. To read the Texas Republican Platform of 2004, go to http://www.texasgop.org/library/RPTPlatform2004.pdf

Advertisement
Copyright © 2004 Raw Story Media. All rights reserved. | Site map | Privacy policy