Breaking News, Top Breaking News, Liberal News
DISCUSSION FORUMS | BLOG | EDITORIALS Liberal news Liberal News

MAIN PAGE

Features

Liberal News
Midday | Evening
Editorials| Archives
Editors' Blog

Community

Liberal news
Blue Lemur Blogs
-Your free blog!
Discussion Forums

Favorite Links
Logo & Raw Shop

Contact

Contact| Link to us
Advertise
| Join

About

About Us
Privacy | Site Map

Picking a candidate you actually like

By Greg November | RAW STORY COLUMNIST

Recently, I was speaking with a woman in my office who said the feel in the air these days reminds her of the 1960s. People, she said, are excited and angry. People hate our president. People love him. Our country is divided, maybe not in a Civil War sense, but divided nonetheless.


The strange thing is most debate I hear revolves around the guy you hate, Bush or Kerry, not the guy you like.

Truthfully, it’s encouraging to see everyone fired up. But if everyone is hateful of the other guy, whichever one he may be for you, and if your vote is cast from this hate, are you really voting for anyone?

These days most people’s minds are made up fast (actually, most people’s minds were made up three years ago), so who really benefits from a limited field of presidential candidates? Seems like these days you’re either afraid to change leadership mid-war or afraid not to, so whoever’s got you support only has it because he’s not the other guy.

Suppose there were three, or four, or ten candidates, all professing different visions of the future. Suppose there was actual choice involved. Our leaders tell us to get out and vote, but it seems this comes at the cost of actual decision-making. If it’s not simply “This guy or this guy” maybe the decision would be too difficult for our already vote-phobic citizenry. Maybe we’d be stricken with a strange brain paralysis. Speech would fail us and our heads would explode.

The last night of the DNC I went to a John Kerry keg party at my friend’s place. He’d done the living room in campaign posters. There was a table with pamphlets, stickers, pins, more posters, leaflets and name tags. He’d rented a huge screen and projector, the same set-up he had for the Eagles-Bucs game last year. A crowd showed up, maybe 40 people, most of them not anyone we knew, just local Dems who saw the party listed on the website. Someone made jello shots. I stood there watching this enormous screen in my friend’s living room, surrounded by people I didn’t recognize, and this fear gripped me that I’d be outed as a skeptic, not someone who was on board completely.

I looked around at the rapt faces and kept my mouth shut, though inside I was busting. “This speech is just a string of unassailable slogans! Why are you clapping?” I looked over at our host, my friend from college. He kept bopping his head like he was at a concert. He clapped every time Kerry took a pause. I wanted to walk over and tap him on the shoulder. “Hey,” I’d tell him. “You’re a gay man and as of yet Kerry has not come out in favor of you, so what’s with the enthusiasm?”

I wanted to tell everyone there that John Kerry was only left-leaning enough for them to sleep at night, but not so progressive as to enact actual change, 1960s-style. He’s only better than the alternative, but not really all that good himself. If he was one of, say, eight candidates running, do you really, I mean really, think you’d be clapping right now?

I knew if I said any of this it’d be the end. They’d attack me like Frankenstein’s monster. “He’s not one of us!” they’d holler as they pushed me out of the apartment and into the night. “Go party with Nader!” they’d yell.

So I kept quiet. I listened to the people talking on television. Truthfully, I didn’t blame anyone in that room for their convictions. They’re scared. They’re excited and angry. So am I. I’m pulling for Kerry, big time. But in a better world (not perfect, just better) I wouldn’t vote for him, and I don’t know that many of them would either. They’re enthusiasm is not based on what he is but on what he isn’t. Listen, it doesn’t matter if it comes out tomorrow that a couple years ago Kerry murdered babies and ate them. He might lose some swing votes. But for most people there’s no other choice. Kerry doesn’t have to campaign for any but about 12 of his votes in Pennsylvania and Ohio. So in a sense by refusing to fight for a multi-party system we’ve surrendered our right to participate in a republic. We don’t actually have real choice.

Just before Kerry took the podium, this guy comes up to me and introduces himself, says he was never very political-minded before this election, but now he’s in a tizzy about Bush. “I mean, I voted for Al Gore in 2000, of course,” he says. Even when he had a choice he didn’t want it. I smiled back at him. “Of course,” I said.

I went home that night and tried to talk myself out of making up my mind, too. Stay open, I told myself. Stay vigilant. Don’t decide four months before the election who you’re going to vote for. Vote your conscience. Get active. Because in some ways my coworker is right. People are angry and scared and divided and there’s a sense in the air that the future of our country rests on this election. But in a very important way she is wrong. This isn’t the 1960s. These days we aren’t fighting because of what we believe in; we’re fighting because of what we don’t.




Advertisement
Copyright © 2004 Raw Story Media. All rights reserved. | Site map | Privacy policy