Breaking News, Top Breaking News, Liberal News
FORUMS | BLOG | EDITORIALS Liberal news Liberal News
Contact

Contact | Link to us
Advertise
|
About Us

A PIECE OF ADVICE
Say what's unpopular, get to what's popular

By Michael Sherrin | RAW STORY CONTRIBUTOR

Liberal government happens. Imagine 69 Democratic Senators. Imagine, at the same time, a second term Democratic President. Imagine a time when that Democratic President feared Southern Democrats more than Republican sound bites.

Advertisement

This was the case a short 60 years ago. Franklin Delano Roosevelt and the Democratic Party commanded such popularity that there was no state where they weren’t competitive. When FDR concerned himself with the social issues of the times, the conservative Southern Democrats threatened his agenda more than any Republican.

The Democrats were in power and they can be in power again. Unfortunately, the current strategy of the Democratic Party seems ineffective at combating the ever-dominant social issues. Try to explain the Democratic Party’s stance on same-sex marriage in under 30 seconds with enough time to explain how you’re going to provide health insurance for all Americans. While the Republicans have simple, conservative answers on abortion and school prayer, Democrats flounder in the center with no one to represent the left. By swinging to the left, the Democrats can deliever short, simple positions on these controversial social issues, giving them time to turn the subject to what Democrats have always won on–economics.

When Democrats were at their political prime of power and popularity, they created the New Deal. Even if the Republican exaggerations regarding Social Security were true, it will last for almost one hundred years before problems begin. While Republicans call Democrats tax and spenders, the last Republican to even propose a balanced budget was Eisenhower. Both Clinton and Johnson balanced the budget, while Reagan ran a higher deficit than Dubya.

Clinton’s New Democrats had the right idea by trying to compromise. Unfortunately, not all decisions work perfectly. Author Thomas Frank attributes Clinton’s melding of Democrats and Republicans on issues like NAFTA and welfare left social issues as the only major differences voters have to choose candidates by.

Democrats: stop suffering through that babble about opposing gay marriage, but supporting civil unions that grant the same rights as marriage, but it isn’t marriage and that’s okay, though let’s not pass an amendment to ban it in case we change our minds. Instead, try telling Tim Russert that you favor gay marriage—and then have enough time to ask why the Republicans don’t put the cops they fired back on the streets. Instead of finding the middle-ground on opposing abortion but being pro-choice, say you support Roe v. Wade—and then ask why Republicans cut child care programs.

While the polarized liberal views on these social issues will alienate some voters, this would still do more good than bad. Firstly, the more conservative voters are already voting Republican. You will never convince a true-believer that abortion is helpful to society. The Democrats are already looked at as the party that is pro-abortion, pro-gay, and pro-destruction of all that is moral and good. You don’t give people a reason to vote for you by being the same as the people they are already voting for. That’s why the more Democrats move to the center, the more Republicans move to the right.

Democrats need to change the conversation. They have no chance to win on social issues. But pushed far enough left, these issues become one line explanations that give time to bring up issues that matter like the three E’s— education, employment, and enforcement. These are the things that matter in every person’s daily life. Education is obvious. Employment includes minimum wage, unions, outsourcing, and farm subsidies. Enforcement encompasses public and military services, including the environment, police, and business regulation. And while public opinion may not agree, historically Democrats are better at each.

Democrats need to go on the offensive, and provide proof that their alternative is better. Honestly pointing out that Social Security only needs minor tweaks looks timid and weak. Call for a raise in the payroll tax for the top 1% and show you’re looking out for the workers, not Hollywood, who’s getting the tax increase.

Democrats spend so much time defensively stumbling over the social issues that they have no chance to control the conversation. By simply answering the social issue questions, Democrats can bring up the issues Republicans don’t want to talk about. Like when was the last time Congress had a serious conversation about the state of public education.

Our nation’s educational system requires a major revamp. School vouchers are admittedly a postponement until solutions can be found. Since Republicans would rather build a Star Wars missile defense program than classrooms, let Democrats take the reigns. Like the Republicans on Social Security, set up a task force of Democrats to develop a new educational plan absent of vouchers and creationism. Let a mid-level Senator take point on this. If the program takes off, you make an unknown a star. If the program doesn’t fly, few will hate someone for trying to fix education.

By putting forth such an ambitious program, you start the debate. Whatever the Democrats propose would require compromise with Republicans, meaning the conversation will change. If Republicans try to change the conversation back, Democrats only have to ask why Republicans care more about Massachusets gay couples than kids in their own district. By unifying quick, simple, though liberal answers to the social issues, Democrats find time to change the conversation to the important social matters that are being ignored in the public discourse. Education will affect the most people meaning if Democrats turn every conversation to education, eventually Republicans are going to have match wits.

How do I know this will happen? Republicans need an enemy. Even with every branch of the government wrapped around their gas pumps, the liberal elite still triumphs. Moral decay continues as gays pass along homosexual germs and New York bans only the Christian Bible. Republicans present these not as logical arguments arguments, but as “proof” they are the victims. If they were the victims, then why aren’t they fixing the problems? Democrats need to start asking these questions.

A freelance writer and editor, Michael can be contacted at MikeCS83@yahoo.com or through his website at http://mikecs.95mb.com/.

Advertisement
Copyright © 2004-05 Raw Story Media, Inc. All rights reserved. | Site map | Privacy policy