Breaking News, Top Breaking News, Liberal News
FORUMS | BLOG | EDITORIALS
Editions

MAIN PAGE

Raw Story Midday
Raw Story Evening
Raw Story Forums
Raw Friendster

Sections


Arts
Editorials
-April Editorials

-Feb/Mar Editorials

Editors' Blog
Links
About Us
Archives

Shops

I Like it Raw Shop
Raw Story Logo Shop

Contact


Contact us
Link to us
Advertise


Privacy Policy
Site Map

 



 

The U.S. drug war: Twenty-first century prohibition

By Cameron Stoddart
RAW STORY COLUMNIST

I find it flabbergasting that Nixon’s draconian war on drugs has not been smashed, stomped, pummeled and pulverized (perhaps I’ve spent one too many early mornings grubbing in a drunken stupor at Waffle House). The war on drugs is the alcohol prohibition of the 1920s and early ’30s, part deux.

Advertisement


We all know that prohibiting the sale of alcohol was a miserable failure. In fact, it was such a complete catastrophe that the Constitution’s 21st Amendment ensures alcohol never again will be made illegal. Thank you, FDR! The war on drugs is the equivalent of drug prohibition. Like its predecessor, it plagues over society, a veritable war on the impoverished.

Since the inception of the drug prohibition, teen drug use has multiplied seven times. Teenagers are rebels without a cause. They want to abuse some type of substance, and alcohol and tobacco, the only legal drugs, are difficult to obtain without a fake ID. Plus, they're legal; that’s not resisting authority. I remember high school — the preps, the hippies, the clicks and the illegal drugs running through all of the different circles. I do not recall even once seeing alcohol or tobacco in anybody’s backpack.

No teenager is going to slide up scandalously next to his buddy whispering, “Hey, bro, scope out the goods,” while he points at a pack of cigarettes. A sack full of buds, meanwhile, is something that will get his little veins in his forehead to protrude and pulsate. Abusing those drugs is against the rules, and that's cool.

Prohibiting the use of drugs entails losing the ability to effectively regulate and monitor them by driving them underground. Absolute intolerance of drugs does not stop those who want to use them from using them. What it does do is put a small percentage of nonviolent drug offenders in jail. Optimistic reports claim that only 10 percent to 15 percent of the drugs that are brought into America are found. Eighty-five to 90 percent arrive untouched, making the war on drugs ineffective and useless.

Drug-related crimes continue to increase exponentially. The black market created by the prohibition of drugs is directly responsible for murders and crimes in many of America’s inner cities. Think about it: Prohibition limits supply, not demand. Limiting supply means exorbitant profits are to be made (just look at gas prices today — $2.50 a gallon here in Southern California. Ouch!). Those that have the demand, but cannot afford the drugs, find criminal means of procurement. Exorbitant profits create the need to establish your territory. These territories’ occupants operating in the black market form gangs to designate and distinguish turfs. These gangs kill to defend their profits — primarily black-on-black violence.

Another less elaborate example of how limiting supply affects buyers is plain old debt. Cocaine is around $150 for 3.5 grams. If one cannot or does not repay the seller punctually, the distributor likely will echo the sentiments of Don Corleone by threatening to make him an offer he can’t refuse … violence.

The current homicide rate is 10 per 100,000, the highest it has been since alcohol prohibition. This makes America one of the most dangerous countries in the world, especially the Western world. Only our nation has such a thing as a prison-industrial complex, another significant consequence of the war on drugs.

Since the war on drugs started, prison populations have exploded. There are eight times as many prisoners as there were three decades ago. Police are employed to capture and detain black marketeers. Users go to jail for hurting only themselves. Peddlers go to jail because the government wants to eliminate a competitor — more on that later. The government has no place regulating what may go in or come out of our bodies. That is partly why the 18th Amendment was repealed. People perceived government as putting its nose where it did not belong (Iraq is one thing, but your constituents’ bodies are quite another). Religious fundamentalists pushed the alcohol prohibition through Congress. Racism pushed the drug prohibition through. Incarcerating nonviolent drug offenders is unacceptable.

The war on drugs, whether intentionally or not, has mutated into the war on those living in poverty. Of nearly 2 million inmates nationwide, 70 percent are minorities, a particularly alarming statistic when you realize that Caucasians comprise nearly 70 percent of the American population. Something is seriously awry in these Divided States of America.

The war on drugs is masked racism. It is a war on the impoverished.

Crazy, you say? Then this notion you will find preposterous: The federal government does not terminate this foolish war because it is the primary recipient of the monies collected. It gets the money from the drug busts, it gets the money for excessive bail bonds, and 85 percent of the drugs that come into this country go unnoticed.

That's bad for the war on drugs, unless the government is the principal dealer. I am not trying to start a conspiracy theory here, but I've heard that those who stand to benefit the most are usually the culprits. Ordinary citizens like you and me are losing this war. If our government were losing it, wouldn’t it retreat, call a cease-fire, and end the abomination that it is?

The war on drugs has accomplished its antithesis. Drug prohibition has wounded America’s psyche. I am not for an America run amuck with druggies gallivanting in the streets high on heroin and PCP, looting convenience stores and vandalizing cars while wearing bras on their heads.

Holland legalized marijuana and heroin long ago. As a percentage, it has half the amount of people dancing with Mary Jane that we have here at home, and a third of the smack users. I am for a safe America, where I am free to roam through the streets of Los Angeles, New York or Atlanta by myself at night, unafraid and uninhibited; where the rich do not have to barricade their homes, alienating themselves from the rest of the world in an attempt to protect their possessions.

Drug abusers have nowhere to go to find information or treatment. Jail is their only recourse. It is high time we end this crusade of intolerance. Educate and rehabilitate, do not humiliate and incarcerate.

Every dollar spent on incarcerating people is seven times more effective when spent on education and treatment. Sheltering the homeless, feeding the hungry — just providing for the poor in general — is much more helpful to society than imprisoning nonviolent drug offenders. Assistance, acceptance and understanding are better for the poor and impoverished, and for society as a cohesive, dynamic, “living” organism. Taking this angle, our organism is murderous, masochistic, and hateful — endangered. Ending the war on drugs will not save us, but it will be one giant leap toward curing our ailing society.

Help us help you. Take this three-minute survey to help us get better ads.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement
Copyright © 2004 by Raw Story Media. All rights reserved. | Site map | Privacy policy