Op-ed: Fitzgerald needs/deserves fair evaluation
There have been numerous articles, discussions and analyses of the announcement that the United States Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois, Patrick Fitzgerald, was ranked as "undistinguished" on a Department of Justice chart sent to the White House in March 2005. Some have also described his evaluation as one which rated him as being merely "mediocre."
If this wasn't so critically important to the future of prosecutorial activity in Chicago, it would almost be comical. Some have portrayed the story in a humorous light, but it is much too serious to pass off as a joke at this time. However, none of the information available appears to fully explain the criteria utilized to reach the evaluation of
The Chicago Crime Commission is most concerned about this failure to
provide a clear, convincing explanation of the methods and standards
utilized to formulate the ratings for the United States Attorneys. It would
seem that any objective evaluation of the success of the office managed by
Mr. Fitzgerald would have resulted in a rating of excellent in all
categories. His office has returned numerous indictments in all criminal
areas, including public corruption, white-collar crime, and organized crime -- including street gangs with the guns and drugs they bring to the cases.
Those indictments have resulted in significant convictions in almost all
cases, and there is every reason to believe that there are additional cases
in the investigative stages for the future. There is a fear developing that
the less than positive evaluation may be used as an excuse to remove Mr.
Fitzgerald and sidetrack some of those potential future prosecutions.
The prosecutions and successes have been a shot of oxygen for the
citizens of Illinois to begin to breathe air a bit freer of the stench of
corruption that has polluted their daily lives for too long. However, there
is more work to be completed and more air to freshen before Mr. Fitzgerald
should be permitted to adjourn and move on to other challenges.
The Chicago Crime Commission strongly suggests that other evaluations of Mr. Fitzgerald should be undertaken by peer and community groups. Any independent, unbiased assessment of the management and performance of Mr. Fitzgerald provided to the Attorney General or the President should provide a more appropriate evaluation.
The Chicago Crime Commission also suggests that it would provide solid
arguments for the position that Mr. Fitzgerald has just begun tearing down
old methods and needs additional time to complete the overhaul of corrupt
systems that still exist in Illinois. Any attempt by the current
administration to change the leadership of the Chicago office of the
Department of Justice should be met with an overwhelming objection from the
public at large and support from all members of our community for the
continuation of the excellent work by Mr. Fitzgerald and his staff.
(James W. Wagner serves as the president of the Chicago Crime Commission. The commission is a non-partisan, not-for-profit organization "founded in 1919 by 35 members of the Chicago business community, and is the oldest and most respected citizens' crime commission in the nation." Wagner once supervised organized-crime investigations for the FBI.)
More information on the ranking of Fitzgerald can be found at this link.