Quantcast

We Make Shit Up

By Jesse Taylor
Thursday, June 19, 2008 18:36 EDT
google plus icon
 
  • Print Friendly and PDF
  • Email this page

imageCongressional Quarterly seems to be admitting that ideological rankings of Senators and Representatives, including their own, provide inaccurate, selective and mislabeled impressions of politicians.

Yet, for some reason, they keep doing them.

The Voteview approach is widely praised by political scientists because it has been very accurate at predicting how members vote. But Poole acknowledges his liberal-conservative scale doesn’t fully capture the complexity of lawmakers’ viewpoints.

“American politics is a philosophical mess in that there is no philosophical coherence to political parties. The parties are just groups of issue positions,” he said.

Green, the National Journal editor, says voters shouldn’t rely on a single rating to determine a candidate’s ideology.

“There’s pluses and minuses to each rating system. If you look at a number of them, I think you have a pretty good picture,” he said.

Of course it would help if, perhaps, these ranking groups didn’t try to boil down fundamentally incongruent, complex forms of decision making into #1 Super Most Liberal Time Happy Explosion. That’s just a thought.

Jesse Taylor
Jesse Taylor
Jesse Taylor is an attorney and blogger from the great state of Ohio. He founded Pandagon in July, 2002, and has also served on the campaign and in the administration of former Ohio Governor Ted Strickland. He focuses on politics, race, law and pop culture, as well as the odd personal digression when the mood strikes.
 
 
 
 
By commenting, you agree to our terms of service
and to abide by our commenting policy.
 
Google+