Who could have predicted?

By auguste
Wednesday, July 9, 2008 10:11 EDT
google plus icon
  • Print Friendly and PDF
  • Email this page

That paying $1.6 billion for a business with essentially no revenue stream might lead to difficulties? It’s not like we’ve ever seen anything like that before – especially not involving the internet.

Update: Okay, “essentially no” is probably too strong a descriptor. “Tenuous and difficult to expand” is more like it. Plus, no matter how bad YouTube’s revenue model is, at least it’s not as bad as this.

People close to the company’s finances say most of the retailer’s earnings came in the form of one-time so-called “tenant improvement” payments from landlords of $2 million to $7 million per store.

Via Atrios.

By commenting, you agree to our terms of service
and to abide by our commenting policy.