Scientific American on why evo psych is bad biology
Occasionally, desperate sexists, particularly of the Nice Guy® variety, accuse me of being anti-science and practically a creationist because I don’t think that pop evo psych theories are science when it’s all about why the cavemen adhered to gender binaries that presume “The Flintstones” was documentary. I promise, my belief that women are not born bimbos and men are not born with the inability to think and behave themselves has nothing to do with opposition to science. If anything, it’s because I’m so pro-science that I hate to see shitty science get so much popular approval because it reinforces negative stereotypes.
Seems Scientific American is “anti-science” now, with this article explaining why evo psych is bad biology.
About
Pandagon is the go-to zone for eye-rolling at conservative nonsense, feminist rants, election-watching, and obsessing over low-rated but critically acclaimed television. Jesse Taylor and Amanda Marcotte may take politics very seriously, but egos not so much.
Featured Video
Raw Exclusives
blog advertising is good for you
Follow Us!
