Quantcast

Comment by Cardinal results in Vatican homobigoted ‘clarification’

By pams
Monday, January 19, 2009 1:59 EDT
google plus icon
 
  • Print Friendly and PDF
  • Email this page

Yet again, in its zeal to condemn anything related to LGBTs as frequently as it can, the Catholic church sends out the Prada Papa Ratzi’s emissaries to bleat the party line when Benedict himself takes a break from public statements fomenting homophobia.

This time it was Cardinal Ennio Antonelli at the mic sticking his foot in his mouth at the World Meeting of Families in Mexico City, but he inadvertently went off message and suggested that homosexuality within a personal relationship was OK.

“the homosexual experience must stay within the confines of a private relation, a relation between friends.”

That didn’t go over well after being published in a French paper, so The Vatican’s Pontifical Council for the Family had to quickly issue a lengthy homophobic “clarification” :

1. Homosexuality is not a necessary component of society, as is the family. Society is organized around the relationship of the couple that is formed by a man and a woman. They find each other in conjugal life and in family life. In this sense, the couple and the family enter into the sphere of social life, and because of this, of civil law. The relationship between two persons of the same sex is not the same as the relationship of a couple that is based on the sexual difference. These two situations depend on structures that are not of the same nature. The homosexual relationship does not enter into this social sphere. It is, as such, a private question. Legislators make an anthropological error when they want to socially organize homosexuality. They run the risk of provoking an intellectual confusion, as well as confusion of identity and relationships. It should not be forgotten that confusion frequently favors insecurity, unstable relationships and violence, when legislators don’t respect the fundamental sense of human relationships. The family is a common good of humanity that is not at the free disposition of legislators to respond to the subjective and problematic demands of today. The individual desire cannot be the foundation for the law. Here we find ourselves in the presence of a confusion between the law, which is of the public domain, and the desire, which is subjective.

2. Affirming that homosexuality is a private fact, the president of the Pontifical Council of the Family is not justifying it. The cardinal simply underlined that homosexuality does not contribute favorably to the organization of individuals and of society. The exercise of homosexuality does not reflect the truth of friendship. Friendship is inherent to the human condition in that it offers relationships of proximity, help and cooperation, in a courteous and amiable climate. Friendship should be lived chastely.

3. The Church maintains its preoccupation of welcoming and accompanying homosexual persons. Every person that has difficulties to live their sexuality properly is called to find Christ and to live, consequently, in accord with the demands of liberty and responsibility of faith, hope and charity. On the other hand, it is contrary to the truth of the human identity and the design of God to live a homosexual experience, a relationship of this type, and even more to attempt to demand same-sex marriage. It is contrary to the true interests of the persons and of the needs of society. It constitutes a transgression of the sense of love as God has revealed to us through the message of Christ, of which the Church is a servant, as an expression of love toward the men and women of our time.

 
 
 
 
By commenting, you agree to our terms of service
and to abide by our commenting policy.
 
Google+