Cornell doctor sliced young girls’ genitals; Tested girls as young as six with vibrator, columnist says

By David Edwards
Thursday, June 17, 2010 15:04 EST
Print
 
Topics:
 

A Cornell doctor is performing partial clitoris removal on young girls and then using a vibrator to test their sensation in follow-up tests, a shocking column by syndicated columnist Dan Savage asserted Wednesday.

Dr. Dix P. Poppas has been performing the procedure on girls older than five for several years, according to 2007 paper (PDF) documenting the research. The doctor and patients’ parents allegedly believe that the girls’ clitorises are too large and create too much sensation.

Doctors Alice Dreger and Ellen K. Feder have criticized the practice for almost ten years.

Critics in medicine, bioethics, and patient advocacy have questioned the surgery’s necessity, safety, and efficacy. We still know of no evidence that a large clitoris increases psychological risk (so is the surgery even necessary?), and we do know of substantial anecdotal evidence that it does not increase risk. Importantly, there also seems to be evidence that clitoroplasties performed in infancy do increase risk – of harm to physical and sexual functioning, as well as psychosocial harm.

Dan Savage called the practice genital mutilation in a Wednesday column titled “Female Genital Mutilation at Cornell University.”

There’s lots to be outraged about here: there’s nothing wrong with these girls and their healthy, functional-if-larger-than-average clitorises; there’s no need to operate on these girls; and surgically altering a girl’s clitoris because it’s “too big” has been found to do lasting physical and psychological harm.

While many have been aware of the procedure, called “Nerve Sparing Ventral Clitoroplasty,” for years, Poppas is now alarming many experts with new details of a follow-up exam. Dreger and Feder recently brought to light the practice of stimulating the young girls’ clitorises with a vibrator to test the efficacy of the partial clitoris removal.

Here more specifically is, apparently, what is happening: At annual visits after the surgery, while a parent watches, Poppas touches the daughter’s surgically shortened clitoris with a cotton-tip applicator and/or with a “vibratory device,” and the girl is asked to report to Poppas how strongly she feels him touching her clitoris. Using the vibrator, he also touches her on her inner thigh, her labia minora, and the introitus of her vagina, asking her to report, on a scale of 0 (no sensation) to 5 (maximum), how strongly she feels the touch. Yang, Felsen, and Poppas also report a “capillary perfusion testing,” which means a physician or nurse pushes a finger nail on the girl’s clitoris to see if the blood goes away and comes back, a sign of healthy tissue. Poppas has indicated in this article and elsewhere that ideally he seeks to conduct annual exams with these girls. He intends to chart the development of their sexual sensation over time.

Writing in an article for Psychology Today, Dreger suspected that the procedure and the follow-up exams were sure to cause more harm than good.

Many of us happen to think “normal” sexual development is actually likely to be thwarted by having parts of your genitals taken away without your consent, and thwarted by follow-up exams like the ones we are describing. Ellen and I have gotten to know hundreds of adults born with sex anomalies who went through these medical scenes growing up. Many have told us that the genital displays involved in the follow-up exams were more traumatic than any other part of the experience. Indeed, when I once asked a group of women with androgen insensitivity syndrome what they wanted me to work on primarily in my advocacy work, they said stopping the exams, particularly those in which med students, residents, and fellows parade through to check out the surgeon’s handiwork.

The follow-up exam comes “very close to straight-up molestation,” wrote conservative blogger Liz Mair.

“In fact, it seems to me that this is the kind of thing that a) Cornell University should not be tolerating, as a matter of practice and b) may well be worthy of actually legislating on, given the recent discussion of the American Academy of Pediatrics signing off on what amounts to better-branded female genital mutilation where needed to satisfy certain cultural dictates,” said Mair.

“Cornell University needs to put a stop to this, immediately. If it is going on elsewhere, those cutting the checks wherever ‘elsewhere’ may be need to put a stop to it, also. This is, at a minimum, battery, and at worst, it’s child abuse. Either way, it’s intolerable,” she concluded.

David Edwards
David Edwards
David Edwards has served as an editor at Raw Story since 2006. His work can also be found at Crooks & Liars, and he's also been published at The BRAD BLOG. He came to Raw Story after working as a network manager for the state of North Carolina and as as engineer developing enterprise resource planning software. Follow him on Twitter at @DavidEdwards.
Share this story >>
Print
 
 
 
By commenting, you agree to our terms of service
and to abide by our commenting policy.
 
  • NoOneYouKnow

    So Dr. Poppas is acting out his psychosexual disturbances on young girls. Who are these “experts” to determine if a clitoris is too large? Too large for whom? Dr. Poppas?

  • mindboggeling

    Where are we again? Somalia or the U.S.? What disgustingly perverse people. AND the parents watched while the Dr. stimulates their child with a sex toy? WTF?

  • bcpolar

    I sit on an ethics board for a major university, and I can't imagine we would ever approve a study like this. It's disgusting, and I cannot see any social or medical benefit to it – aside from assuaging parents who think their daughters have too much sensitivity.

    I can't help but think of Mengele.

  • njt

    wow i agree with “conservative blogger Liz Mair”? wow. I agree with conservative blogger Liz Mair.

  • indi_progressive

    Oh, thats it, we are just done for, throw in the towel, stop pushing the rock, drop the heavens, its just over…

  • Big-o-other

    What business is it of the parents? How pray tell, did they 'discover' this sensitivity? Are they trying to prevent female sexual activity? The study should be done on THEM!

  • Prattvictory

    What?

    Who are these sick twisted people and why aren't they in jail?

    It does explain Michelle Bachmann

  • rainbowz

    Arrrgggggggg!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • FiftysRN

    How are they determining sensitivity? That is subjective. I don't see how Cornell has allowed this to happen and continue. Sure lowers its credibility. I also can't see this doc still having a license. This is female castration!

  • Lincolnparadox

    It said in the article. It is a subjective 0 to 5 test.

  • Prattvictory

    Once you get accepted into medical school you are pretty much guaranteed to get your shingle no matter how much they have to medicate you sick twisted self to get you through the program. Someone like the Craigslist killer would have become a doctor and done whatever twisted things he imagined and if he was clever enough he would have gotten away with it.

    What is really alarming is the Cornell was party to it. This isn't just a wacky individual but an institution.

  • Martie_t_99

    These people are flat nuts. What gives a man the right to claim anything about a girl. Let's take a little off him because he is to big. Idiots.

  • Lincolnparadox

    Considering the age of these patients, my guess would be that the parents sought out this procedure.

    I'd be curious to see how the patients felt about the whole ordeal. An enlarged clitoris can lead to increase sensitivity due to simple friction. Some younger girls might be embarrassed by these sensations.

    Granted, my first therapy choice wouldn't be genital mutilation.

  • My3Cats

    “An enlarged clitoris can lead to increase sensitivity due to simple friction. Some younger girls might be embarrassed by these sensations.”

    Then I suggest we shorten men's dicks. They seem to have the same troubles.

  • Pinroot

    Wow! Maybe Obama can get this guy to replace Holdren. Holdren just talks; this guy acts!

  • Yaright

    hey children… can you say doctor mengele??

  • nygrump

    “What business is it of the parents?”
    They're the parents. They give baths, apply ointments, even wipe the children, all appropriately and without need to project perversity on them. Some girls are largely developed. Is it a medical need the doctor is addressing? Or a cosmetic need like circumcision?

  • braind

    what the fuck is wrong with these people…. and I use the word people very loosely?

  • braind

    I swear to god…. comic relief is all we have left. Thanks for the laugh.

  • Creepusg

    Oh my god. This is almost too sick to comprehend. I can't believe parents would subject their daughters to this and an actual doctor would perform it. The doctor needs to be debarred.

  • hvooo

    Genital mutilation was originally instituted BY MEN out of their own insecure fear that their women would cheat on them. They made it a “religious sin” to hide the real reason they wanted their women mutilated. Slap the name of God on anything, and no one questions it!!!

    I don't think God likes it much when man uses “His name in vain” to cover up their own sins and sick man made laws!

  • denhickey

    This has been allowed to go on for over 10 years?!?!?! How is this quack not in prison??? How does he still have a medical license?

  • http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/UR4DHHC3P6RRXIUP4LWX54YN7I hu

    Yet, male genital mutilation is never criticized, because no one dares to criticize the Demon Lord of the Jews – who happens to be the same Demon Lord worshiped by all orthodox Christians and Muslims.

    Damn you hypocrites.

  • http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/UR4DHHC3P6RRXIUP4LWX54YN7I hu

    They probably already did. It's called “circumcision,” but I guess men are subhuman and its ok to cut baby males. Piss off and die.

  • mrcoldheart

    That was the most disgusting thing I've heard on the internet today.

    This doctor should be getting his ass beat in jail right now.

  • Fuckyou

    Try decaf

  • Anastasia Beaverhausen

    What kind of parents allow anyone to do this to their children? How disgusting!

  • fuckyou

    Hey hu, did they circumcize you 4″ dick down to 2″? Foreskin removal has been proven to reduce infections and cancers. Now go clean your room.

  • Kero_bearus

    This doesnt just imply molestation, it IS molestation. this doctor should go to prison for life.

  • Kero_bearus

    You sound no better than the doctor.

  • guest

    I can bet you that if the so-called men, the fathers of these girls had to undergo a similar surgery to decrease the size of their already small penises, this practice would come to a screeching halt!

    One mother in an ABC news clip said that she feels her daughters should have to have the same thing done to them as was done to her. What a fucking bitch!

    God created man in his likeness so all I can is I now understand why there's so many fucking assholes on this earth who would do this shit to their kids.

  • theghostpony

    What.The.Fucking.Hell.

    “The follow-up exam comes “very close to straight-up molestation,” wrote conservative blogger Liz Mair.

    Damn right. This is child molestation (and mutilation) and the parents and the doctor need to be imprisoned over this sick shit.

  • Richglo638

    Sad,sad, sad. Sick, sick, sick. Guess that this clown would like to have his son's penis shortened or his daughter undergo the same operation he performs on these girls. What is wrong with those mothers? The moms and this ? doctor should all be jailed. And to think that this is happening at Cornell University Hospital, NY NY, USA. WOW!

  • theghostpony

    LOL!

  • James P

    Sounds like a prurient interest to me, on the part of the doctor.

  • Asdfg

    circumcision is just that, yet I doubt you are against that.

  • jroush

    You people are idiots and, more to the point, not medical professionals. There could be plenty of legitimate reasons to treat this as a medical issue in a pre-pubescent child. I've done a lot of reading about genital mutilation, which is typically done in filthy conditions by indigenous practitioners for reasons not connected to any medical condition. This does not fit that bill of particulars. The reaction to this is just another facet of the completely insane and uptight attitudes we have in this society which often prevent females from receiving the medical care they need. Pretty soon you'll be advocating that only female doctors can treat female patients if there's going to be anything going on “down there.” Get over yourselves.

    And that bogus psychologist, who may have a PhD in clinical psychology – which doesn't make her an M.D. – had to drag in comments from her adult patients about being exhibited to med students and so forth. There is nothing in the article to indicate that this is taking place at Cornell. The parents of these girls have to be permitted to seek out medical treatment they feel is necessary for their children and in the absence of any objective evidence of nefarious conduct or abuse, all you busybodies should just butt out.

  • Ian

    I ask myself the same question when in America STILL millions of would-be-parents allow their male children's foreskin's to be butchered and sliced off of their genitalia.

  • guest

    You are an idiot. Circumcision does not shorten a man's penis and does not preclude him from enjoying sexual satisfaction. This is not true of female genital mutilation. Circumcision actually is a positive healthful act, both for the man and his future sexual partners. Go fuck yourself, asshole.

  • guest

    Are you really that stupid? There is no NEED for this. Circumcision is not cosmetic. And mutilation is not acceptable. Parents have no business whatsoever messing with the sexuality of their children.

  • CarlPagan

    Why do we waste our medical talent in this country fucking people up? I don't even feel circumcision is really needed or warranted, with proper personal hygiene. I didn't have a choice in the matter, but at least it doesn't reduce my sexual sensation as an adult. Do the males that control the medicalindustrial complex feel threatened by multiorgasmic women? If these women are unable to or have difficulty achieving orgasm later in life, I hope they file suit.

  • Tblttx

    You are crazy. My bet on this is that virtually all these young girls are daughters of immigrants from MUSLIM COUNTRIES.

    It doesn't mention it here, but I am a former medical professional and this is disgusting…disgusting…and illegal. No parent should be able to make a decision for a young girl which could effect her ability to have sexual pleasure later, I don't care if it is done in some back alley or in a noted hospital, such as this.

    I am APPALLED THAT CORNELL HAS PERMITTED THIS… and they should lose all federal funding for having done this. THIS IS ILLEGAL.

  • Tblttx

    It isn't quite the same thing. Males do not risk losing sexual function from having a male circumcision, and many are not doing it.

    This, however, IS FEDERALLY PROHIBITED. It is against the law, and IT SHOULD BE. My take on this would be that virtually ALL OF THE PARENTS INVOLVED in this are immigrant parents from Muslim countries.

  • davewtf

    Get over yourself

  • davewtf

    You would be incorrect on that. There are plenty of professionals and non-professionals alike who believe that male circumcision is just as unnecessary and just as brutal.

  • Homa sapiens

    A large clitoris is not a medical condition, any more than a large penis is. You don't go asking the surgeon to make your son's dick smaller, do you?

    There are more and more obvious reasons, for women to avoid male doctors for genital issues.

  • 437298437927

    Kill that mother fucker

  • Firstdonoharm

    These girls are mostly Americans born with Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia. Sterile operating rooms don't guarantee good outcomes. There's absolutely nothing wrong with these girl's clitorises… they're just bigger than 'normal'. There's no proof that these surgeries make us any happier or more fufilled sexually. And putting a vibrator on a little girl's private parts with her parents in the room yearly? With no benefit to her (after all, what's done is done)?? What is modern medicine thinking???

  • 22465464654

    They're mutilating the genitals of six year old girls.

    They're mutilating the genitals of six year old girls.

    They're mutilating the genitals of six year old girls.

    Is any of this getting through to you at all?

  • 15646435456

    No it isn't; circumcision actually does lower sexual pleasure for the male. Actually, babies who have gone through that procedure have been found to be more sensitive to pain throughout their lives than males who haven't…

  • Firstdonoharm

    They have been doing these types of surgery since the 1950's when they figured out how to anesthetize infants without killing them. Well, most of the time anyway… it's considered an appropriate risk. They used to do total cliterectomies and just throw it in the trash. We've moved in the right direction but we're obviously not there yet if surgeons are vibrating clitorises to see if they still work.

  • 1564676874864

    No he doesn't.

    And don't bother with the usual self-righteous spiel about the nature of revenge, no one cares. This shit should be punishable by castration with rusty kitchen utensils.

  • Little_Me

    WOW! A Pedophile officially sanctioned by Cornell!

    I can't imagine what kind of parent would agree to do this to their daughter.

    Also, I am in a fog about HOW ON EARTH the parents decided that the clitoris of their FIVE YEAR OLD daughter is too big! When my daughter was 5, I did NOT check out her clitoris – or any other female organ! I am not a prude, but that thought never even entered my mind!

    The PEDOPHILE doctor wants to do yearly follow-up examinations… KEEP YOUR @#$%^!!! FINGERS OFF THOSE INNOCENT LITTLE GIRLS!!!

  • Jaycubed

    Circumcision is sexual mutilation performed on unwilling infants for religious reasons. There is no medical justification for it since any potential health problems in uncircumcised adults can be easily prevented with simple hygiene.

    It is the brutal sexual abuse of children by their parents and doctors.

    And what evidence do you have that ANY of the children involved have “immigrant parents from Muslim countries”? Or is it just a little racism sprinkled on top of your bowl of arrogant stupidity?

  • Firstdonoharm

    Most of these surgeries, particularly on clitorises, are purely cosmetic.

  • Firstdonoharm

    Which university? If you have a medical school, they are teaching this as best care practices. Seriously, this is a protocol in serious need of revision.

  • Firstdonoharm

    Which university? If you have a medical school, they are teaching this as best care practices. Seriously, this is a protocol in serious need of revision.

  • 156786987

    NO.

    Parents do NOT have the right to mutilate their children in the name of turning their daughters into female sexual property (which is what's happening here; if there was any legitimate medical reason to do this like taking out a tumor, the fucked up “doctor” wouldn't be using a vibrator on them to check for reactions to stimuli, you fuckup).

    PERIOD.

    DOT DOT FUCKING DOT.

  • 156786987

    NO.

    Parents do NOT have the right to mutilate their children in the name of turning their daughters into female sexual property (which is what's happening here; if there was any legitimate medical reason to do this like taking out a tumor, the fucked up “doctor” wouldn't be using a vibrator on them to check for reactions to stimuli, you fuckup).

    PERIOD.

    DOT DOT FUCKING DOT.

  • Nudist

    There is no such thing a “too large a clit” ! :)

  • Nudist

    There is no such thing a “too large a clit” ! :)

  • Little_Me

    NOT at age FIVE anymore! Besides – HOW in the world did they find out about their daughter's clitoris being 'too big'?!?

  • nolongeranonymous

    Who is this insane culture and why am I part of it? I herewith tender my resignation as a modern human with all the “benefits” of civilization. You guys can keep modern medicine and agriculture, and your crazy-ass distractions of national borders, belief systems and politics.

  • enorceht

    so when was the last time you laid on your back in a room full of strangers, naked, legs spread, while each had a chance to poke around or maybe use a vibrator and then asked you to “clinically” report on a scale of 0 to 5 what exactly that sensation felt like….

    did i hear you say yesterday ?

  • jaycubed

    You're not really thinking clearly here.

    How does female genital mutilation have ANY effect on the ability of women to “cheat” on men?

    What it does do is decrease the ability of women to feel pleasure during sex.

    It is a very different form of control over the sexuality of women. It would be totally ineffective as a form of “infidelity” prevention.

    There are (fortunately extremely rare) types of female genital mutilation which prevent sexual access to “unmarried” girls, but these involve sewing the vulva together.

  • Atilla

    You moron. So, Because the procedure is done in a clinic and not in the brush, by a “doctor”, instead of an old woman, it is not genital mutilation? I would like to see the ethnicity of those girls, Mostly Blacks, Seiks and from Muslim countries, I'd bet. You sound like the doctor who damned killed me by refusing to give me antibiotics when I had pneumonia, because pneumonia wasn't his diagnosis, so me having pneumonia would have meant that he was wrong and as a doctor he could never be wrong. So therefore my fever, coughing, short breath, and bloody sputum had to be all in my head. Doctors should be placed in the Custer museum.

  • Atilla

    Demon Lord of the Jews. I like that. I've been using the Evil God of Abraham, and Moses's evil Gin found in a bottle in the Siani. I hope you don't mind if I use it.

  • Atilla

    You must be one of those scared rabbits worshipping the Demon Lord of the Jews in his filthy little warren.

  • Atilla

    You can bet he is vibrating her clitoris with one hand while the other one is down his pants.

  • Atilla

    How the hell do you know? You've either had a foreskin all your life or you haven't. You probably don't have a dick anyway.

  • Atilla

    That's complete bullshit too, fuckyou too.

  • Atilla

    For once I agree with you. I like 'em big.

  • Ziply

    I am sorry, but this is some sick f*d up s*t. Excuse my asterisks.

  • davidrvelasquez

    You took the words and the asterisks right out of my mouth.

  • John

    Lots of outrage from uptight Eurocrazies on this board because young girls are having parent approved surgical procedures in a medical office in the USA. YET, these same Eurocrazies have no problem with European Americans raping and murdering young girls in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Somalia, Colombia, Honduras and where ever else the US has 700+ bases. Shame, shame, shame…………

  • Workingstill

    Agreed. Why don't we castrate him without anesthesia. Then diddle him to see is there is any feeling. Let's use a baseball bat or a 2X4. This guy should face a firing squad and the parents who consented to such stupidity should be placed in the cell below ground, never to see the light of day.

  • jay

    You ever been in Europe? Most people here are against this money war full of lies.

  • Workingstill

    You dumbass. How you ever put your hands on a keyboard and typed such bullshit is a mystery. Let's lay you down on a table, spread your legs, and chopped off your dick, then use a baseball bat with a cotton tip to see how it feels, you know on a scale of 0 to 5.

  • Firstdonoharm

    They're mutilating the genitals of infants.
    Then they see what damaged has been done when they are six years old… and 7, 8, 9…
    Is that better? Or worse? Of course – it's only informational – the vibrating and qtip tests- because once you cut nerves that can never be repaired.

  • IHateHypocrites

    I can't believe the hypocrites here that yell about this practice, but condone circumcision.

    Circumcision is just as much mutilation as this. You lose a good chunk of nerve endings when it is performed.

    I didn't even have an orgasm during sex until I was 28, because I didn't have much sensation in my penis. It infuriates me to think what I have been denied at someone else's whim, for my entire life, when I didn't even have a choice. But this is seen as “normal”, whereas everyone's up in arms when it's a girl's genitalia involved. Hypocrites all.

  • iRead

    Dr. Poppas, to use a charitable interpretation, seeks to advance medical science. He is, however, ethically incapable of sound judgment. Being that he is highly trained, but should by no means be designing, running, or supervising any clinical studies whatever. Neither should he be a practitioner, as his judgment is fatally flawed.
    He should be able to take part in the advancement of medical research, though. I think his best option, and the best option for humanity, is to allow (or compel) him to take part in research studies on the efficacy of ECT and radical lobotomies–as a subject.
    Thereby, he can be a contributor to the greater body of medical knowledge without endangering any more children, and may, in fact, be rendered completely harmless and inert (which would be a tremendous improvement).

  • gary2515

    Nobody wants head cheese brother

  • MrPunch

    nobody wants eye crusties either but we dont circumcise eyelids.

  • Sabrina Beach

    …the FCUK is wrong with people.

  • Sabrina Beach

    Who says all respondants here condone male circumcision? I am a lesbian, but believe male circumcision is just as barbaric a practice. We wouldn't grow these parts if they didn't serve a purpose.

  • IHateHypocrites

    I apologize, I didn't mean to imply that everyone's comments agreed with circumcision, but I've seen a number of comments that did, including one that said it's “different circumstances” for circumcision. It isn't.

  • Lisakitty

    The big difference here would be that the doctor has the girls come back for follow up check ups and uses a vibrator and other means of stimulation on a child. MOLESTATION OF A MINOR IS ILLEGAL!!! This doctor should be stripped of his doctoring license NOW!!!

  • hauksdottir

    The parents are as much to blame as the doctor. If there was no demand for this procedure, he wouldn't have victims.

    Do any of these parents bring their little boys in because their testicles are too big or their penis is crooked? Does anybody test a 5 year old boy for stimulation and have him spread-eagled on an exam table while half the staff and a class of students walk in and stare at his penis and watch to see if it gets erect?

    Sexual abuse of children ought not be tolerated anywhere on this planet, and certainly not within the operating theatre of a noted teaching university.

    Did he film this?

    As much as I'd like to bind him to a table and start slicing and vibrating, I am a law-abiding citizen. Trial by jury, and the parents who probed their daughter's private parts with sex in mind need to be charged and tried as well.

    And any pictures ought to be introduced into evidence so the taxpayers can see exactly what this doctor and the students he was teaching were doing. Good luck with the next bond issue. Cornell won't remove this doctor, or the procedure, unless they hurt deep in the wallet.

    What kind of restitution or counseling can one give little children, when their own parents say they are malformed?!?

  • Anonymous

    Ice pick lobotomies were promoted by Dr. Walter Freeman as a quick “cure” for any emotionally diagnosed mental ailment. He promoted it as a convenient cure for everything from normal depression to rebellious teenagers. Others in the field viewed it as acceptable research.When money is involved, you find out the doctors level of moral judgment can be quite low. The case of Dr. Mengele was not unique. There should be some sort of moral trustworthiness psychological test given to all medical school applicants. But I’m sure that would meet a wall of resistance, because there is money to be made.

  • michaelmcleary

    He needs to have his medical license taken away.

  • expat

    Reminds me of the monster doc in the mid 20th century who lobotomized a bunch of innocent people.

    So…how exactly is penile circumcision not mutilation?

  • Scooter B. Sawsun

    “We wouldn't grow these parts if they didn't serve a purpose.”
    Tell that to your appendix and tonsils (one of which almost everybody reading this has had removed). And the hair on your legs and under your arms that you probably shave regularly. And the toe and fingernails you clip every week or so. And the ear lobes you poke holes in.

    The difference between this disgusting report and a normal male circumcision is that boys don't undergo years of follow-up molestation or the humiliating, repeated public display of their genitals under the guise of science. So let's not pretend they're the same, okay?

  • E_E

    You can get people do a lot things that one would not normally do by having an authority figure say it's necessary. Its similar to the way cults are able to get people to believe in non-sense. Or why Limbaugh has so many listeners. Its why we still circumcise male infants because we have been told that its good and it needs to be done. People just do it and don't even think about it and sign the form and usually never question the practice.

    Dr. Kellog from cereal fame was one of the first doctors in the late 1800's that believed male circumcision helped prevent masturbation, epilepsy, mental issues etc.

    I think the doctor(s) wanted to test this theory but he probably wouldn't be able to get many women that would have this procedure done so he needed some way of being able to this type procedure to do his tests. The doctor probably had some kind of weird fetish.

    The U.S. used to circumcise some girls in the 50's that had a large clitoris and thought it would prevent some ailments.

  • Prattvictory

    Breast enhancement sales are sagging. They had to come up with a new way to capitalize on women's insecurities.

    It all about the money.

  • John

    More pseudoscience from over educated idiots with few morals. You gotta wonder how he was brought up before he joined up for Cornell's Mengele Weirdness Program and why he would think it is OK somehow. I mean this guy is clearly a freakish sort, who instead of receiving an education, should have gotten therapy.

  • 234233

    Dr. 'dicks P. pop-ass'??? this is either a sick joke or it's not his given name, and somebody should have spotted his twisted ways long before this.

  • http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/D5WWU3GBTONSFKXGPNYADSJEXM Richard Ralph Roehl

    Josef Mengele, the savage Nazi brute who did horrifying medical experiments on concentration camp prisoners, would be very impressed with Amerika's medical establishment.

    Like the Germans of the 1930s, today's Amerikans are clueless and ignorant, many of them willfully ignorant (meaning $tewepid). In lieu of inhaling to the Chief… they are in-Heiling him!

    Dr Poppass should be in jail… and charged with torture, mutilation and indulging in sexual deviant behavior with children. Better yet! Maybe we should just throw a rope over the bough of an oak tree and hang him (after putting a pitchfork up his orifice).

  • guest

    Really? Which medical class studies group did you attend? Or, are you speaking from personal experience about having your dick resized (made even smaller) via circumcision? Come on, tell us you have 8 inches of foreskin removed thus decreasing the length of your penis.

  • http://twitter.com/shivabeach Shiva

    The worst part is that many people knew about it and let it go on. This man is incapable of practicing medicine

  • IHateHypocrites

    I've never had my tonsils or my appendix removed. Incidentally, they found that the appendix does in fact serve a purpose:

    http://www.webmd.com/digestive-disorders/news/2…

    True enough, there's no public display involved. The mutiliation, however, is almost exactly the same, which is the point I was making. We can all agree that both male and female genitalia serve a purpose; comparing it to having your tonsils removed is just silly.

  • E_E
  • http://twitter.com/MC_HIV David Wilton

    How about getting the DA on it? You can't cloak child abuse in medical research and get away with it. Or can you?

  • http://twitter.com/MC_HIV David Wilton

    How about getting the DA on it? You can't cloak child abuse in medical research and get away with it. Or can you?

  • abettor

    Pfft….
    Doctors MUTILATE every day, and noone bats an eye.
    It's called circumcision. Just because we do something in the name of tradition doesn't mean it's not mutilation due to warped minds. Most 'tradtions' are completely fucked up.

  • abettor

    I disagree with youragrument and find it weak. Hair is like fingernails. It has no nerve endings. The appendix was figured out lst year. It holds a recharge culture for your intestines should you ever get an illness that totally wipes out the flora in your GI tract.

    What you have there, is a bunch of rationalizations for a barbaric procedure.

  • abettor

    We don't plug up noses or asses because snots and feces are unpleasant.

  • Juan Valdez

    He should have taken the name Dr. Krank (sick). The world's full of perverts, but how'd he get hired at a (?)respectable school?

    Regardless, the parents get most of the blame for delivering their children into his evil hands. As I've said for decades, people should be trained, tested and licensed before they're allowed to have children.

  • http://twitter.com/ursulas ursula

    I WANT TO THROW UP!

  • horsey

    o.my.gawd.

  • gary2515

    We have one vote for head cheese

  • gary2515

    And a second vote for head cheese

  • Sarasunshine

    The parents and the doctor are perverts getting away with child molestation. They should be arrested, the doctor should be disqualified as a doctor, and the parents should lose their rights to their daughters. What the hell – who was looking and measuring in the first place? Who would even think of something like this? The police, the district attorney, and child protective services should get to work.

  • cynthiza

    Yes, and then we give men Viagra. Go figure. Too much sensation in a young child's clitoris? Who are these parents, anyway? And stimulating the clitoris in order to perform this barbaric procedure? It is outrageous, wrong, and was done completely for the gratification of the “doctor”. Insanity. And done here, in this country. Unbelievable.

  • MyCultureSux

    We've invaded countries for less.

  • TheGoodLocust

    Female genital mutilation is an African/Muslim thing. I guess they are trying to “sex it up” and make it legitimate for use in the US.

  • Dareedo

    Further, who is funding this “research”, better termed, human experimentation, nazi-style. I want to know who is funding this crap. They need to be sued by child advocates on behalf of these children and should be made to pay for them to live a life of luxury for the rest of their days.

  • 156786987

    Your tonsils help fight infections in your mouth (when you get tonsillitis? That's your tonsils doing their job) and recent studies have shown that your appendix holds bacteria that helps you digest food. And trying to compare genital mutilation to shaving and ear piercings? What the hell is wrong with you?

    Please, for the love of god, STOP TRYING TO JUSTIFY GENITAL MUTILATION. STOP IT.

  • 156786987

    Then try washing. I know that's a bit hard for you neanderthals, but I promise you, the bar of soap over there won't hurt you. Really.

  • 156786987

    Because the point of genital mutilation is to reduce, if not completely get rid of sexual pleasure so the victim, presumably, has no reason to go out and do the horizontal mambo with anyone.

    It's basically an ancient version of population control rearing its ugly head in modern times.

  • Tyroanee

    Taking my child to a doctor named Popp-ass? No… I'll pass.

  • Syed92

    The man is classical rightist Christian and they believe harming others, as long as they are safe, so was this animal.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1322809127 Shalene Shimer

    How you can speak out:

    Dr. Dix Poppas (the degenerate slime behind this)

    Phone (212) 746-5337
    Fax (212) 746-8065
    525 East 68th Street
    Suite F-935
    New York, NY 10065

    Email Contact Info:

    Dean of Weill Medical College, Antonio Gotto: dean@med.cornell.edu
    Dr. Poppas himself: dpoppas@med.cornell.edu
    University President, David Skorton: president@cornell.edu

    AND BEAR IN MIND: While Cornell is an Ivy League, 3 of its colleges are state funded. The Senator of their district is Sen George Winner, winner@senate.state.ny.us . Please feel free to cc him on this, as Money Talks.

  • Allenabo

    Sounds to me that a District Attorney needs to be prosecuting some doctors and parents for aggravated sexual assault. This is disgusting.
    Allen B. Odum, J.D.

  • Lincoln Paradox

    Really, you’d just have to cut of the glans penis to have a comparable procedure.

    Just snip the tip.

  • Lincoln Paradox

    Really, you’d just have to cut of the glans penis to have a comparable procedure.

    Just snip the tip.

  • Lincoln Paradox

    Really, you’d just have to cut of the glans penis to have a comparable procedure.

    Just snip the tip.

  • Colemanrocks

    Spot-on!

  • canadaeh

    Believe it or not, even Adolph Hitler tried to stop Child Sexual Mutilation by banning the Jews from cutting up the sex organs of poor helpless babies. Any Doctor today, committing this act on a male or female should be charged with child molestation including the Jewish Rabies that performs this despicable act. Shame on you America for the sexual prevision that takes place in your Country and no wonder when your children grow up they get revenge by hurting , raping and murdering woman . Maybe that is some sort of latent response of anger that comes forth when a man who has been circumcised responds to his own sexuality with violence. Violence begets violence. Your sex organ my friend is supposed to be a tool to procreate with not promote vengeance and hate. Check out http://www.sexasnatureintendedit.com/10F/1hook_… and you will see evidence of the results of how Doctors turn babies into sexual monsters by hurting woman with their deformed sex organ.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Charles-Jernigan/614061225 Charles Jernigan

    You're thinking Rabbis.
    This is different than a circumcision. People become overly dramatic with things and begin to clump them together without thoroughly thinking through their thoughts. A circumcision is a practice that dates back to BEFORE the Jews were “told by god” to do it. Romans, Greeks, Aborigines, some African tribes, and even Monogoloid tribes did it because it's clean, safe, and effective at helping promote good health by reducing filth buildup.
    Sexual prevision huh? How about you clarify there as I'm pretty sure that phrase has NEVER been used.
    There may be a preponderance of rape and murder in the U.S.A. but that's only because we've got a larger population than some backwoods countries I could name. Oh and I'm assuming your from Canada based on your name so correct me if I'm wrong, but there's actually more sexual crimes per capita across Canada than in the U.S.
    http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/cri_rap_perca…

    According to that list you're actually higher than the U.S. by over TWICE the numbers. It's not circumcision that causes someone to rape/murder, it's a mental imbalance, or a lack of conscience at the time of acting.

    Your “evidence” shows that more sexual predators are circumcised, not that circumcision causes sexual predation. Don't get your facts mixed up when trying to quote something or you'll come off looking like a fool.

  • Bubba

    I dont believe the doctor involved is getting his jollies out of the experience. It sounds fairly clinical. Many adult women have a similar procedure. Since very young children are not able to judge the 'appropriateness' of the size of their genitals, the real problem seems to be with the parents and their seriously misguided views on what is 'normal'. I am a bit surprised that the doctor involved would agree to perform this procedure on someone so young. The decision to alter ones genitals should be made once a person is fully mature and can make decisions for themselves. The local medical ethics board needs a good kick in the pants (no pun).

  • Sarah

    Primum non nocere
    FIRST DO NO HARM – there is NO reason for a doctor to cut on a healthy body.
    A large clitoris that does not interfere with bodily processes should never be cut on unless the person is of age to decide cosmetically that she wants it reduced. Single digit age children would not fall under this category. This isn't even like an minor deformity that would cause abuse from other children, no one else would ever know.
    This is a disgusting practice.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Charles-Jernigan/614061225 Charles Jernigan

    The man's a pediatrician, and the procedure was actually suggested as a beginning to his experiment to see whether he could do the surgery without harming the nerve endings. I see nothing wrong with this surgery being done to possibly advance the study of the effects of plastic surgery on sexual organs.

    What I can't understand is who would perform this surgery that honestly won't have any potentially positive effects until adulthood or at the very least adolescence…… on a five year old child.

    If you're going to perform a surgery on a someone that has absolutely no benefit at the time of surgery, and potentially no benefit later in life, but has potentially life-changing negative effects, perform it on someone who has the ability to say “Yes, please do this surgery” not someone who a couple years ago stopped saying “gagagoogoo”.

  • Jungle Girl

    All I have to say, his name is Dr. Dix P. Poppas… Dix Poppas??? Is this for real? LOL

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=556352914 Alex Rieder

    actually there is a risk involved in circumcision. and men can loose function. they can loose their entire penis. read “as nature made him”. Oh and i didnt mean to hit “like” i meant to hit reply, so dont think anyone liked your comment.

  • canadaeh

    The harm from rape usually is not the mutilation of the genitals so I would certainly say that Child sexual mutilation or Circumcision is a worse crime than rape as it permanently destroys the function of the victim for life, from what nature given. In the USA however if you merely refer to the word Jew one is automatically regarded as anti Semite and thus gives license for this group of people to continue to cut the skin of babies genitals. I also deplore what the Germans did to the Jews in World war 2 however no one has a monopoly on morality.
    Now back to the subject and that is the despicable practice of male or female circumcision it should be handled as a crime worse than rape and if it is a JEW or a Christian, Doctor or Moslem that performs it, they should be put in jail. You see I am not just picking on the Jews here however they are the ones that have gay parties after they butcher their children genitals. I think that is sick.
    Once again check out this website http://www.sexasnatureintendedit.com/10F/1hook_… . If you are an American Jew take a good look at yourself and what they have done to you when you were a child.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Stephanie-Stell/100000916292892 Stephanie Stell

    There is nothing wrong with any of the children being mutilated other than being mutilated with out thier knowledge of what they are doing to them and consent. What is the right length of a female clitoris? all my life i have been told that there is nothing wrong with you if you are born like that. as long as these children are healthy why ? the parents think thier child is a freak? i mean what would make a parent decide to let a surgeon after his/her little girl just b/c the parent sees different size or shape. all women are different down there so who is to say one is normal and the other not?

  • captainfrank

    The both of you are sick fucks. You don't mutilate a little girls vagina, and then see how well you can still get her off. Sorry, but we as Humans don't get to determine the “appropriate size” of a woman's clitoris.

    Now, If the little girl grows up and wants to chop up her vadge that is up to her.

  • Quizmos

    Strangely, the conservative blogger and I agree, this is child molestation and mutilation, nothing less.

  • Quizmos

    “Shame on you America”? Who the hell are you? This is a story about the practice of a doctor, not a country!

  • captainfrank

    Not quite, bud. Circumcision is more of a cleanliness thing.

    Cutting out a girls clitoris, because it is 'too big' and likely to deliver too much 'sensation', is more of a sick religious sexually oppressive thing.

    There is nothing more sinful that a woman feeling sexual pleasure. Cause if that happens she is just going to be a huge whore when she grows up, right?

  • captainfrank

    I'm pretty sure when I got circumcised a doctor didn't stick a vibrator up my ass, or anything like that.

    Another point: I don't know about you, but I got my dick stuck in the zipper of my onesie pajamas more that enough having been circumcised, I could only imagine how much more frequent an occurrence it would have been, had I not been circumcised.

    I'm going to go throw up now, on multiple levels.

  • captainfrank

    I don't want my frank and beans to smell any worse than they already do.

  • Shri Sa Hetep

    Why would a parent be looking so closely at their daughters clitoris anyway? Especially the father – maybe that is where the molestation started.

  • Doc Holiday

    You're some sick fucking freaks that should be sterlized.

  • canadaeh

    By using such language as “ Who the hell are you” your are demonstrating that you have lost control of your emotions and can no longer debate. I feel sorry for you, however this is a site where intelligent people like to discuss current events in a civilized manner so please get off this site until you can grow up.

  • davidbodhi

    Saying that circumcision leads directly to sexual violence is silly. MOST men in the west are circumcised. Most men do not engage in sexual violence.

    Your statement is similar to someone saying smoking weed leads to heroin addiction. Statistically, it's MORE true that drinking mother's milk from the breast leads to heroin addiction because more addicts drank their mother's milk than started on weed.

    Probably the vast majority of men who commit sexual violence have been circumsized, but even more of them probably wear pants. Statistically, then, wearing pants is more likely to lead to sexual violence than circumcision. My point is that, just because most of them have been circumcised it does NOT follow that the one causes the other.

    That is, as I said, silly.

  • pist

    i agree they did it to me when i was newborn and i wish they hadnt

    but still studies show that the circumcised are less likely to get aids its probably a cleanliness issue

  • Atilla

    Obviously you never had a daughter. I guess Ragheads don't change diapers.

  • Atilla

    Only with the Popes permission.

  • 156786987

    It doesn’t matter if it does, condoms can do the same thing more effectively without mutilating somebody.

    Some things in this world are just plain wrong, no matter the circumstances or so-called potential benefits. This is one of them.

  • azhermit

    Shri Sa Hatep is on the mark… why would a father who changes his daughter's diaper stare at her clitoris? Must be a white cracker thing…

  • gary2515

    You don't understand, it's ok, we're not all equal in terms of education. A therapist might help your bitter frustration in losing your foreskin. I wish you the best in your endeavors, your welcome.

  • azhermit

    If you want polite I suggest you visit the church website of your choice. This isn't a kool aid drinkers forum.

  • kluvlaw

    If you just read the headline, sure this can sound terrible. But, upon reflection, parental consent is obviously required in all operations. Therefore, we must assume there are significant issues, unknown to outsiders, which lead these families to select the operation.

    What I find most striking in all the feigned outrage, and accusations of molestation, is that most posts are missing the elephant in the room…it is socially acceptable to mutilate the penis at birth (and friends and family may be invited to the mutilation ceremony).

    I'm just curious why there is an apparent double standard for men and women.

  • putheiceback

    Ayaan Hirsi Ali – On Human Rights
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7VsnVmPbgjk

    Christopher Hitchens – Genital Mutilation
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SvZpEiaLvpU

  • putheiceback
  • putheiceback

    What group of people have a hang-up with sex in general. This is a thumper thing and when some realize that's what this is… they'll oddly overlook and or dismiss this as no big deal.

    This is like abstinence only education… but before the education. A form of home-schooling in a way.

    Yet they claim god made us perfect. :-/

  • IHateHypocrites

    Try washing ‘em! It works!

  • morty62

    I'm not saying this is so great, but if they outlaw this they should outlaw the Hassidic Jewish practice of Rabbis performing vasectomies and then removing the foreskin with their teeth. Oh wait, that's religious freedom. Never mind!

  • pist

    omg

    hang the sob

  • JAG

    The Greeks and Romans did NOT practice circumcision as an everyday effect of their cultures. If you will simply look at Greek and Roman male paintings, pottery, sculptures and other art, you will see there are NO circumcised men in those works. They did not practice that. IN fact it is Christians and the Jews who so distinguished their religions as being “not like the Greeks” so as to separate themselves from those “godless heathens”. Most cultures did not circumcise until Jewish/Christian/Muslim (some sects) started it. It was in America that a prevalance of circumcisions began in the later Victorian period, with an interesting movement promoted by Mr. Kellog and Grahm of corn flake and cracker fame, that circumcision was promoted, again as a perverted Christian vehicle to dissuade young men from sexual desires. To UNDO this act against me, I totally restored my foreskin.

  • PeteWa

    wtf?

    the doctor should have his dick and balls cut clean off, and all those parents should be in jail and their children taken away from them permanently.

    fucking monsters.

  • Moreclit

    I thought your liberals were interested in SCIENCE? No doctor just wakes up one day and says – i'm gonna just start slicing into clitoruses. This is a study had to have been approved by an IRB which weighed the pros and cons and decided it was worth doing. I think its legit to question the need or motvation for PATIENTS looking for the procedure but its still the parents who decide if this is the right thing for their daughters. Trust me Dr. Poppas is not wlking the street pulling down the pants of every little girl with a bulge in her pants. Parents bring this to the attention of pediatritians and the refer to Poppas. Again its fine to say this is not something you agree with but this IS NOT ABUSE and sayin so makes you sound like a Bible quoting moron

  • pist

    im serious this merits the death penalty

  • pist

    burn in hell you stupid rotten evil irredeemable son of a bitch

  • pist

    what kind of a sick asshole would attempt to justify the torture and mutilation of children??

    eat shit and die

  • pist

    both are bad but both the pain and the consequences are worse for females

  • Moreclit's hellbound

    Like the “scientific” experiments in the NAZI's WWII camps? Moreclit, you have NO SOUL.

  • Gingerlk

    Moreclit- the parents are just as sick and twisted as the doctors are here. And I would like to think that all American are interested in science, and pacifically in this case, advocates of our nations youth.
    I believe there are many practices done by health professionals in this country that are unethical and should be looked at further as a violation of human rights.
    I'm surprised a Republican, I imagine this is true due to your liberal shot, could be saying all this. I thought your party is disgusted with abortion. The same argument could be tossed right back at you in regards to that. So in essence you are a hypocrite.
    If you don't like people being advocates of our nations youth, then don't read articles like this one.
    Sorry you live your life in a skewed and mislead, misinterpreted darkness.

  • Cutefluffyanimals

    I don't think that's way. It's just as horrific when it happens to men as it is for women — most people just think that the two are different because male circumcision is so ingrained in the culture. If I ever had a son, I'd never have him in a hospital because I'm too afraid of them doing this shit to him. >.>;

    Lots of things that we as a culture do on a daily basis, when thought about, are actually pretty horrific…

  • 156786987

    Circumcision wasn't performed in ancient times for “health reasons”, it was performed to prevent masturbation.

  • 156786987

    No it's not a “cleanliness thing”, circumcision was done to prevent masturbation, it isn't until modern times that doctors have been trying to find health reasons to use as excuses for doing this evil shit.

    All of that stuff about how circumcision prevents infections is ridiculous. You know what else prevents infections? A FUCKING BAR OF SOAP! The same with the fucks who say that circumcision helps prevent HIV. One, it obviously doesn't prevent HIV completely, two, you stand a much better chance at preventing it by either using condoms or not sleeping with diseased whores, and three, NO ONE CARES ABOUT ANY OF THIS SHIT. IT IS WRONG. END OF STORY.

    It's like saying you should get your nose cut off and your sinuses ripped out to keep from getting colds.

  • 156786987

    Don't worry about it. Those of us that still have some damn sanity left can see that just as much as you can. This is just a touchy subject for people, that's all.

  • My3Cats

    @Moreclit – first, the word is spelled “pediatricians.” Second, lobotomies were once considered high science as was electro shock therapy, the Tuskegee syphilis experiment, medical experiments and treatments on infants, prisoners and the unsuspecting poor. These and more were justified in the name of “science.” There is also a disturbing pattern of sexual mutilation of women and girls across the world and this clitoris trimming crap by Poppas sounds suspiciously like that. What if the parents are Africans and are really looking to give their daughters legally sanctioned “clitorectomies” as a part of Poppas's research? Do we know who his patient base really is? Their origins? Ethnic backgrounds? Why is it okay to mutilate a female child in the name of “science” at the same time we hear a lot of weeping, wailing and gnashing of teeth about male circumcision? I say if a girl loses an inch, let a guy lose two. Afterall, dicks are bigger.

  • grandlink

    Using a vibrator on kids? What a rotten mthrkr! He needs his gonads sliced and diced and fed to him. So do all who think his way.

  • http://twitter.com/intactive Shuggy

    Read the actual paper http://www.thestranger.com/images/blogimages/20… He didn't use a vibrator, he used an instrument called a “biothesiometer” that was taken away as soon as the girl could feel anything. So the hysterical claims about “sexual abuse” fail. What remains is the fact that the operations and the testing were all done to make healthy girls “normal” in the eyes of their parents, not for any medical need. The human rights abuse of this rare operation is the same as for male circumcision, carried out every 26 seconds in the US. (And hardly at all in the rest of the developed world – shouldn't that tell you something?)

    @Gary2515: Soap and water.

  • PeteWa

    I couldn't get past YOUR first four words; the third word was such a glaring mistake.

  • IHateHypocrites

    How do you get that? I still can't have normal sex at the age of 35, thanks to a lack of sensation, after having my penis mutilated without any choice in the matter. It was decided for me before my brain was developed. Believe me, there's quite a bit of pain involved when you have to explain that to a sex partner. Especially in your 20's. It still infuriates me.

  • http://twitter.com/bujeeboo Sonya Lee

    Jail please, for this monster. NOW!!!!!!

  • E_E

    Thats one of the weirdest arguments I've heard yet. You were glad you got circumcised because your penis got caught in your pajamas.

    He probably didn't take vibrator to your ass, but he probably placed that clamp on very tightly on your penis and it probably made you scream.

  • E_E

    You know what they used to do in a country a long time ago? They would place newborns who had just been recently been born a day or two beforehand and place them in a molded plastic constraint and strap him down. Then the Dr. would put a forcep tool inside his foreskin and scrape the adhesion along the glans of the penis (similar to putting a knife underneath your fingernail). Then he would make a cut with scissors and then place a clamp on the glans of the penis and cut off the skin with a knife (At this point you hope he doesn't slip) And the boy is left with an exposed bloody glans and a nice scar.

    Oh yes, it's currently being done in the U.S. Where is the outrage!?!? It's against the baby's i consent.

    And during busy times it's like an assembly line of male babies being snipped.

    I heard doctors have a contest on how many they can get done in a day.

  • E_E

    Just like male infant circumcision- parent consent is given.

  • putheiceback

    Like this?

    What price did David pay King Saul for his first wife?
    The foreskins of 200 Philistines. –David is supposed to be a biblical role model; but how does massacre and mutilation show moral leadership? What would Saul want with 200 foreskins? Possibly proof that his new son-in-law was a truly macho man for his daughter. (More likely, this reflects the pagan practice of offering foreskins as a rain/fertility ritual.)

    “Wherefore David arose and went, he and his men, and slew of the Philistines two hundred men; and David brought their foreskins, and they gave them in full tale to the king, that he might be the king's son in law. And Saul gave him Michal his daughter to wife.” (I Samuel 18:27)

  • Aicintern2010

    Advocates for Informed Choice is a non-profit organization advocating for the legal and human rights of children with intersex conditions or differences of sex develoment, like the ones in this story. We work in collaboration with bioethicists, doctors, parents, affected adults, and many others. If you are interested in taking action to help protect these children, and to be sure that possible human rights violations are investigated, please join our Facebook page at http://ow.ly/20wTY or sign up for our Twitter feed at http://twitter.com/aiclegal.

  • mick

    I've been pissed off ever since they did it to me ,without my written consent ! Who do I sue ?

  • mick

    Gotta love the Bible for action adventure stories. Does it come with a PGR rating ? It should .

  • Akc247

    Shruggy–

    While I do not agreee with male circumcision in THIS case , all other other pediatricians could not be found to give merit to WHY you would do this to a young girl and found it bordered on abuse Psychologists who were interviewed who were interviewed also agreed there was no medical reason for doing this procedure and it was bordering on abuse..

  • dennycrane

    Hey, Dr. “Poop-Ass”, get yourself an ice pick and perform a lobotomy on yourself.

  • nostrafarious

    this is just sensationalism

  • http://twitter.com/MyPetGloat Gloatessa

    This is utterly horrifying. This doctor should be prosecuted for child abuse, aggravated assault, battery, possibly sexual abuse.

  • http://twitter.com/MyPetGloat Gloatessa

    And you are a concern troll.

  • marcellus2

    Needs two: Mother thinks clitorectomy necessary and doc willing to perform procedure.
    Age old problem with female mutilations of all sorts.

    3$ vibrator or 10000$ med equippment?

    Prude americans

  • Juan Valdez

    Most men in the West are mutilated, Zion? OY!!!!!!!!!!!!

    I believe you're full of excrement.

  • AICintern2010

    Advocates for Informed Choice is a non-profit organization advocating for the legal and human rights of children with intersex conditions or differences of sex develoment, like the ones in this story. We work in collaboration with bioethicists, doctors, parents, affected adults, and many others. If you are interested in taking action to help protect these children, and to be sure that possible human rights violations are investigated, please join our Facebook page at http://ow.ly/20wTY or sign up for our Twitter feed at http://twitter.com/aiclegal. You can also donate to support our work at http://aiclegal.org/we-need-your-support/

  • Spiffarino

    What a sick fuck. What else needs to be said?

  • The Truth

    This was a product of insanely bad parenting, and nothing more.

    Parents are terrible at parenting because our mainstream media industries have melted their fucking brains.

  • Marc

    There's a legitimate argument to be made that male circumcision should, when performed, be done at the patient's consent. That said, it doesn't include any sort of rather violating follow-up exam, runs almost no risk of destroying sexual function in the future, and, frankly, doesn't sound anywhere near as horrific as this procedure.

    And I'm saying this as a circumcised male–I don't, frankly, care one way or another since I don't remember it and I seem to be doing fine.

    This does seem to be sanitized female “circumcision” (misnomer if ever there was one), though it's hard with cultural things like this where it may be ingrained in both parents. It's also, I suppose, possible that it's a sensationalized description of a procedure being done to people with severe sexual deformities, though even if that were the case the follow-up procedure sounds just plain wrong, even if on paper it might make sense as a way to determine long-term side effects. That's a situation where you really should just rely on self-reporting, even if said reporting is unreliable coming from children.

    Doubt that, though. Leave women's bodies beautiful!

  • Clsimpson2009

    breast enhancement sales are sagging….pun INTENDED????

  • Clsimpson2009

    breast enhancement sales are sagging….pun INTENDED????

  • Clsimpson2009

    well, maybe some dicks.

  • StinkHair

    WTF WTF WTF????????????

  • Prattvictory

    Yeah. I probably shouldn’t have gone there.

  • Carliec76

    what a bunch of sick fucks, they should all be in jail.

  • Biblio23

    Did anyone bother to the read the actual study in question? In contrast to Savage, who claims that “there's nothing wrong with these girls and their healthy, functional-if-larger-than-average clitorises”, the vast majority of the girls in this study had congenital adrenal hyperplasia, which is a very severe and deadly developmental condition, or had other problematic conditions. This was not merely aesthetic surgery.

    Furthermore, anyone that can so easily confuse capillary perfusion and a biothesiometer with a “vibrator” should not be trusted at all. It is extremely hard for the human nervous system to detect the 'vibrations' of a biothesiometer – and even when the threshold sensitivity of the nerve ending is reached, it is experienced as a sense of pressure, not a vibration.

    This is purely sensationalism and feigned outrage.

  • dumpbin

    Sounds like this guy is a pedophile and child molester masquerading as an MD…creeeeeeepy….

  • http://www.docjohnsonstoys.com Doc Johnson

    This is easily one of the most disturbing stories I’ve read. Wow.

  • Anonymous

    I would agree that in some cases this type of surgery would be necessary. I just googled congenital adrenal hyperplasia, so yes, there are sometimes reasons. But this is something that simply is not not being handled well. The follow up exams should not be as callous. If other medical professionals want to learn about this, it would seem pictures would suffice, and could be obtained without traumatizing the patient.
    With the current surge of vaginal rejuvenations and genital plastic surgery, this is a slippery slope, and the fact that it involves children makes it all the more suspect, especially with the APA signing off on it. Hopefully, the attention this has received, being it sensationalized or otherwise, will keep this within the confines of true medical necessity.

  • now i c

    WOW… a lot folks in here sound like book burners and witch hunters. Burnt anybody at the stake lately?

    This procedure sound very questionable. BUT, genital abnormalities do happen and to bar someone from treatment would be just as terrible as having a doctor get off on cutting up little girls.

    The question is, is an enlarged clitoris a bona fide medical condition needing to be treated via surgery. That answer is likely in almost all case a resounding NO! But, it is also likely that there are some cases where the size of the clitoris could be a hindrance to daily productive life and effects seriously the quality of life of some females. In those cases multiple medical opinions should be required before any procedure. Especially concerning a child.

  • http://newsandupdate.com/ Candance Couvillion

    Aw, this was a really quality post. In theory I’d like to write like this also – taking time and real effort to make a good article…
    but what can I say… I procrastinate alot and never seem to get anything done…