Grijalva: Deficit hawks against public option are ‘hypocrites,’ ‘phonies’

By Sahil Kapur
Sunday, July 25, 2010 5:07 EST
Print
 
Topics:
 

LAS VEGAS – Progressive caucus co-chair Rep. Raúl Grijalva (D-AZ) on Saturday issued an ultimatum to opponents of a public option who invoke deficit concerns: get behind this program, or you’re hypocrites.

In an exclusive interview with Raw Story at Netroots Nation, a large conference for progressive activists and media, Grijalva lamented how “one of the most important mechanisms [to cut the deficit] was left out of the [health reform] bill.”

But he and more than 120 other members of Congress revived the idea in legislation introduced Thursday, which is projected to save billions of dollars. And they’re using that to challenge the GOP and conservative Democrats, who have claimed it’ll be too costly, to get behind it.

“You’re the deficit hawks,” Grijalva said, referring specifically to Republicans and Blue Dog Democrats, “and we’re giving you a tool to be able to deal with the deficit.”

The measure would offer consumers the choice of a public plan alongside private plans in the insurance exchanges set up by the sweeping health reform law enacted in March. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office projected that it would reduce insurance costs and lower the federal deficit by $68 billion through 2020.

In the wake of the CBO estimates, and amidst a climate of increasing concerns about the national debt, Grijalva charged that self-styled deficit hawks against the measure are inherently being disingenuous, if not worse.

“They’re hypocrites,” Grijalva said. “Basically, they’re against the public option, period, for philosophical reasons, and the excuse that it was going to be too expensive is phony. They’re phonies.”

Conservatives have also derided the public option as simply more government, and warned that it would be a slippery slope to a single payer, Medicare for all-type system.

The Arizona congressman, who was initially wary of supporting a health care bill without a strong public option, said the deficit issue would help progressives win the requisite support this time in Congress.

“We have two arguments going for us,” he said. “Popular support, which we’ve always had, and then the realization that if we’re going to do something about the deficit, that one of the most important mechanisms was left out of the bill.”

The provision faces steep odds for the remainder of this Congress, with the November midterm elections approaching. But Grijalva said the progressive caucus won’t stop fighting next year.

Sahil Kapur
Sahil Kapur
Share this story >>
Print
 
 
 
By commenting, you agree to our terms of service
and to abide by our commenting policy.
 
  • http://evans-politics.com/this-and-that-sunday-new-and-opinion-update.html This and That: Sunday New and Opinion Update | Evans Politics

    [...] Grijalva: Deficit hawks against public option are ‘hypocrites,’ ‘phonies’, The Raw Story, July 25, 2010, by Sahil Kapur, excerpt quoted [...]

  • George

    Go for it Raul! I am behind you. for what that is worth. But it should have been in original bill, but I still think single payer would be better

  • mmckinl

    Rep. Grijalva co-chair of the Democratic Progressive Caucus … Wouldn't that be the caucus that folded over and over again on the health bill? All 30 or so of them?

    Join the Green Party …

  • dennycrane

    The only option, single payer.

  • osage

    TAX THE RICH AT THE PRE-REAGAN RATES…END CORPORATE MONOPOLIES…CREATE GREEN AND INFRASTRUCTURE JOBS…END TWO DISGRACEFULLY WASTEFUL AND TRAGICALLY IMMORAL WARS…SINGLE PAYER HEALTH CARE…SHORTER TERM LIMITS…PUBLIC ONLY CAMPAIGN FINANCING!!!

  • dennycrane

    Join the Socialist Party. Why stay in the “wading” pool?

    Living Things- Mercedes Marxist:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a2SUBYvve1I

  • lucky_2

    Indeed that was them – but look! I can't believe they are on the comeback – wow. I'll probably get my hopes thrown in the dirt again, but let's see…

  • GunTotingLib

    Wanting to have a choice between a public health plan and a corporate plan that takes half my money and gives it to stockholders, megamultimillionaires CEOs, and paying for the gold rimmed china they use in the conference rooms where the real death panels sit, makes me a socialist, then so be it.

    But I will sleep just fine as long as I am not a corporatist fascist willing to be a slave to the huge multinational corporations. Sorry but I still trust my government, of the people, more then an a for profit multinational corporations who sees me as a nothing more then a profit center.

  • RepublicansAreADisease

    Slashing the deficit is easy. Stop handing tax payer money off to corporate scum who's “executives” pile it into bank accounts, and rich stockholders trust funds, instead of their worker's salaries. No one gets a government contract unless their corporation's lowest paid workers make at least 20 times their ceo's salary. Problem solved.

    http://www.RepublicansAreADisease.com

  • Yavo

    You know in the old days Americans took their pitch forks chased after the wealthy and burned the mansions down. The rich gave in.

    Today America gets screwed by the rich, ends up with the clap and the Americans thanks the rich for it.

  • Lodewijk

    Unfortunately, this is just not true by any verifiable historical measure.

    The rich have ruled America–the 13 British colonies and the country that emerged post-1776–almost without fail and without challenge, except for during the period 1933-1945, when their destructive actions nearly brought the US and the world to its knees.

    The wealthiest influences in this country have seen periods of greater power (the Gilded Age) and less (the New Deal era), but they are always in control, and very seldom have been challenged outright (except by the pro-union and union movements in the late 1800s and early 1900s, the radical left and anarchists in the 1960s and early 1970s, etc.).

  • http://voxmagi-necessarywords.blogspot.com/ VoxMagi

    It is pretty noteworthy that, lo and behold, on the eve of a coming election with their own base sick of them and full of contempt for the way they sold out everything…

    …suddenly they develop a partial spine and stand up for a good idea they dumped once before. We'll see how long that lasts…my bet is 1 minute after the votes are tallied in Nov. After that, business as usual.

    Third party is the real answer…be it green or otherwise. Right on.

  • Dolmance

    I think if there was a famine, Fox News could (and would) tell their Tea Bagger friends that serving themselves up for dinner to the rich is what Jesus would do and they'd go for it.

  • PeteWa

    public option public smoption.

    go for the gold, and put single payer on the table.

  • ARealAmerican2

    They don't give a rat's ass about the deficit. They only care if the money is not being spent to exclusively help the wealthy.

  • Yavo

    Read about the Shay's rebellion. It was an insurgency shortly after the American Revolution. Some say it actually amounted to something.

    I agree with your post as well.

  • mmckinl

    The Green Party has the electoral infrastructure and the platform to move forward now … and they don't have the negative connotations of their name …

    The Green Party already has many candidates in many states running in the Fall.

  • http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/ERZ43TY26SRWX4MJT6LZMR64AA Dirk

    Or simply it would be un-American if they didn't sacrifice themselves for the greater good.

  • Dolmance

    Yeah, sacrifice themselves for hungry billionaires. And anything left over could be sold to China.

  • dennycrane

    I'm with ya. Thom Hartmann always says that this is the only country that lets a business get away with making a fortune from being a middle man or pimp between a doctor and a patient.

    “Maybe this world is another planet's Hell.”
    – Aldous Huxley (1894-1963)

  • scytherius

    The GOP and corporate Dems want us dead. We are a nuisance.

  • Janniel

    Yeah they are. They got theirs (single payer health care) so that is good. Rest of us can just keep paying our taxes and, if we can afford health insurance) hope that the insurance company doesn't decide they don't want to pay any benefits to us.

    The lawmakers and the insurance companies…they got the power. We, we just follow along and hope they don't get mad at us.

  • Democratic_Socialist

    “…makes me a socialist, then so be it.”

    WELCOME to the pro-people party!!! Click below to learn much more and realize all the negativity against Democratic Socialism can be attributed to the Capitalist Pigs and the ignorant who, through unwillingness to research D.S. are missing the chance to create a better and more-balanced financial climate plus a more equal playing field on MANY issues.

    http://www.dsausa.org/pdf/widemsoc.pdf

  • TaterSalad

    Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, Barnyard Frank and their likes are yet another part of the Liberal Loon Party (LLP). Liberals who love these types of elected people will vote Democratic for the next 200 years and here is why.

    http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/25759

  • jimbo701

    If you have health insurance, you have no credibility commenting on a plan for those who don't. If you don't have health insurance and you're complaining about a public option, your a simpleton. So, which is it?

  • pinroot

    Here's some “single payer” (why do they call it that when everybody who pays taxes pays for it?) goodness from the UK (one of the places everybody likes to point to when extolling the virtues of single payer systems):

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/7908742/Axe-f…

  • pinroot

    And don't forget, they're all corporate Dems.

  • pinroot

    Meanwhile, MSNBC could tell the average liberal that serving themselves up for dinner to the rich woud be the good for the country/environment/whatever and they'd go for it. You have the same lemming-like behavior; they're just following a (slightly) different leader.

  • Dolmance

    Nonsense. The “average” liberal would tax the billionaires until the deficit was paid and then some, and if it was found they'd engaged in illegal behavior for the purposes of stealing said billions they'd lock them up until they were dead.

  • pinroot

    Why don't you just move to a socialist country? There's Cuba, Venezuela, China and others; why bring that here, where most people don't want it?

  • pinroot

    Thanks for that link, it's very informative. All good Democrats should read it and check out the links in the article. I'm gonna send it to all my Democrat friends.

  • pinroot

    Who is this “single payer” person I keep hearing everybody talking about? Will he do a better job here in the US than he's apparently doing in the UK?

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/7908742/Axe-f…

    Just wondering…

  • BrainRagYell

    Tater: find an objective link, what you supplied there is garbage.

    And pinroot, you're nothing but a stooge to want to promote that garbage.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/John-Kessler/1847633349 John Kessler

    It's single payer because all the money goes into a single pool and all health care costs are paid from that pool. In effect, the government becomes the single payer of all health costs.

    Obviously that money would have to come from premiums (taxes if you wish) that we all would pay. Just like those who can afford it or have access to it pay premiums to private health insurers today.

    The advantage is the government wouldn't be taking a big cut out of the pool for profits, multimillion dollar payments to CEOs and other executives, and for marketing costs. The disadvantage is that those poor CEOs and executives wouldn't be getting all that loot. Instead that money would actually go to pay for health care. Imagine that.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/John-Kessler/1847633349 John Kessler

    I'm always open to seeing intelligent criticism of my values. It really helps to see all sides of an issue. I learn and grow by reading critical items and pondering the meaning.

    But this link points to nothing more than a bunch of hateful bile. Can't conservatives come up with actual ideas and rebuttal without making up stuff and name calling? (IE “liberal loon party”) That piece was basically unreadable tripe.

    The cons will love it but to adds nothing to our discourse.

  • hounddogg

    lol…we will have to start calling her “pinhead” if she thinks anything that comes from spud boy is credible…

  • pinroot

    Start with John Kerry then…
    Sen. John Kerry skips town on sails tax
    http://www.bostonherald.com/track/inside_track/…

    It's funny that the ones who want to raise everybody's taxes somehow manage to find ways to avoid paying taxes.

  • pinroot

    Oh, so we're ALL paying for it. I guess “single payer” sounds nicer than “all you taxpayers will be footing the bill”.

  • Stoop_Solo

    We call it the “National Health Service”.

  • Savantster

    Uh, and Sweden, Switzerland, Denmark, New Zealand, Germany, … lots of places.. in fact, every other modern Western Country has some form of government run payment systems for the masses.. only the U.S. is the last hold out.

    And 70% of the public wants a public option, so I don't know who this “most people” is you're talking about.. you must be confusing dollars with humans, as only the very rich who run the insurance companies “don't want this”, and a few who are content to vote against their own self interests.

  • http://northcapitolstreet.com/2010/07/facing-steep-odds-128-house-democrats-revive-the-public-option/ Facing Steep Odds, 128 House Democrats Revive the Public Option North Capitol Street

    [...] the deficit hawks,” said Rep. Raul Grijalva (D-Ariz.), referring primarily to Republicans, “and we’re giving you a [...]

  • http://thisiscommonsense.com/?p=5936 Common Sense with Paul Jacob – Brought to You by Citizens in Charge Foundation » Archive » The Alternative to the Public Option

    [...] congressional “progressive” caucus still wants to impose a public health insurance option, allegedly to “reduce the [...]

  • http://pornoizle-x.info/uncategorized/teen-slut-teen-sex-video/ porno izle

    This is a good piece of content, I was wondering if I could use this blog on my website, I will link it back to your website though. If this is a problem please let me know and I will take it down right away.

  • http://www.newtrends2011.com/hgtv-green-home-2011-giveaway-enter/ Hgtv Green Home 2011 Giveaway Enter

    Events in the past may be roughly divided into those which probably never happened and those which do not matter.

  • http://www.cheapweddingcakes.org/gluten-free-wedding-cakes-recipes/ Gluten Free Wedding Cakes Recipes

    I’m astounded by people who want to ‘know’ the universe when it’s hard enough to find your way around Chinatown.

  • http://www.seo-optimizare.ro inscrierii in directoare manual

    I like using blogengine too, because that is easy and user friendly for newbie like me.happy writting.

  • http://www.feedbus.com/simplepie/demo/index.php?feed=http://accessoires.ventes-sexy.com/xmlengine.php?xe_rss=1&mb_id=6969&xe_max=25&xe_random=1&xe_catcode=30 Whitley Hauber

    Thank you for you post, i’m glad you’re enjoying it. I used google translator – can you enlighten me please?