Scientist: At least half of spilled Gulf oil embedded in sediment and ‘highly durable’

By Agence France-Presse
Monday, September 27, 2010 16:59 EST
Print
 
Topics:
 

More than half the oil released from a busted BP well remains in the Gulf of Mexico, a presidential panel was told Monday, as the US pointman lamented a “dysfunctional” response to the disaster.

Interior Secretary Ken Salazar meanwhile told the bipartisan commission that the spill had bolstered a drive to reform federal regulations for offshore drilling, promising that lessons were learnt.

In an ominous sign for Gulf residents, however, oceanographer Ian MacDonald told the probe that while much of the oil was dispersed, evaporated or removed by burning and skimming, the “remaining fraction — over 50 percent of the total discharge — is a highly durable material that resists further dissipation.”

His assessment implied some 2.5 million barrels of oil — or 105 million gallons — was still embedded in the fragile ecosystem, out of the estimated 4.9 million barrels that gushed into the Gulf during the 87 days before the well was capped.

“Much of it is now buried in marine and coastal sediments,” MacDonald warned, adding there was “scant evidence for bacterial degradation of this material prior to burial.”

The analysis was in contrast to statistics from US officials in early August that said about 75 percent of the oil spilled from the well had disappeared.

Retired coast guard admiral Thad Allen, US pointman for the spill response, earlier acknowledged that confused perceptions — for both the US public and local public officials — over exactly who was in charge, meant that “procedures that worked terrific for the last 20 years became dysfunctional.”

Critical action to prevent oil from washing onto the fragile Gulf Coast, stop the flow of crude and clean it off the shoreline — in the wake of the April 20 explosion that crippled BP’s Deepwater Horizon drilling rig off Louisiana — were all impacted by the confusion, Allen said.

But Doug Suttles, BP’s chief operating officer for exploration and production and one of the most public faces of the energy giant throughout the crisis, insisted there was no mistaking who made the calls.

“It was always clear to me that the Coast Guard was in charge,” he told the panel.

Billy Nungesser, the outspoken president of Plaquemines Parish in southern Louisiana, told the panel the problem persists months after the oil stopped flowing: “This late in the day, I still can’t tell you who’s in charge.”

Known for his passionate tirades against the government and BP as the spill impacted the local economy and coastline, Nungesser also told the panel: “I’m still angry.”

Hundreds of miles of coastline from Texas to Florida were sullied by the devastating spill, killing wildlife and choking local communities that rely on industries such as tourism and fishing.

Michael Bromwich, head of the revamped Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement, joined Salazar to discuss the offshore drilling moratorium that has been criticized by oil companies that work in the Gulf.

He warned that even after the freeze is lifted, “you won’t see drilling the next day, or even the next week. It’s going to take time.”

“The lessons that have been learnt in the last six months we are going to be applying in the new regulatory framework,” Salazar said.

US Coast Guard Rear Admiral Mary Landry earlier told the probe that the government “absolutely felt there could be a reduction” in the use of subsea chemical dispersants, but said in the early weeks of the spill there was a need to mitigate the coastal impact and amount of oil at the Deepwater Horizon site.

“Over time we met that goal of reducing dispersants,” she added.

By the time the well was capped after more 12 weeks, however, some 1.8 million gallons of of the chemicals had been used.

Dispersants were deemed “generally less toxic than oil… and has been known to biodegrade over days and weeks, much quicker than the oil,” Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lisa Jackson said.

The long-term effects of the use of dispersants and the massive quantities still “warrant caution,” she also warned the commission.

Earlier this month US officials declared the broken well to be finally capped, but BP still faces a long uphill battle to clean up the Gulf, along with a litany of lawsuits, billions of dollars in fines, and shareholders angered by the firm’s instability after its share price more than halved.

BP has pledged to continue “remedying the harm that the spill caused to the Gulf of Mexico, the Gulf Coast environment and to the livelihoods of the people across the region.”

Agence France-Presse
Agence France-Presse
AFP journalists cover wars, conflicts, politics, science, health, the environment, technology, fashion, entertainment, the offbeat, sports and a whole lot more in text, photographs, video, graphics and online.
Share this story >>
Print
 
 
 
By commenting, you agree to our terms of service
and to abide by our commenting policy.
 
  • Anonymous

    More dag gum scientist. Know it alls.

    So, will the south return to Washington more Republicans who would roll back any advancements in eco regulations of businesses?

    Stupid is as stupid does.

  • http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/5ADH43ZCS3NITAIJKNHHOXH5SY C H

    Is this man saying that all that oil after all these months, might actually still be there? Well how can that be so? Didn’t BP and our government indicate that it had magically disappeared?

    This man is not the only scientist to say this. There have been many that have said the same thing. There is no reason to believe that with millions of gallons spewing into the ocean, that it had all bee cleaned up. It’s not possible and common sense should tell us that.

    My aunt lives in Louisiana. She says you can go down to any beach and push you’re fingers into the sand just a couple of inches and they come out covered with oil. It’s there. And cleaning off a few inches of sand on a beach does not make it gone. And in the water it has sunk to the bottom. It is there.

  • Anonymous

    hell..BP should have hired me…any idiot could see they were doing it all wrong… especially the using the dispersant at the ocean floor part..they should have let it go to the surface, and then bring in a fleet of skimmers…they might have even been able to get most of it before it even reached the coast…not saying China is great, but Tony Haywood and all the BP boys would be pushing up Daisys there…

  • Anonymous

    It’s all about obscuring the real numbers of the spill since the fines are levied by the gallon.

    In the end it’s still all about the profit motive.

  • Anonymous

    It’s all about obscuring the real numbers of the spill since the fines are levied by the gallon.

    In the end it’s still all about the profit motive.

  • Anonymous

    Once it became apparent that the oil spill could go on for weeks and months, the Coast Guard could have organized a project to guide the oil to the surface without adding surfactant, and have collected it using an “navy” of oil tankers to suck it up directly from the surface.

    Search Oil-tanker Carousel for an indication of how this could have been done.

    Maybe next time.

  • Anonymous

    oil-tanker_carousel works.

  • Anonymous

    During an environmental study some years back we recovered creosote from pockets under the sand in shallow water that had been there for 80+ years (this was near Pensacola where dumping creosote into the water was common practice for several decades). Chemists call many of these hydrocarbons, especially the toxic polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), refractory – meaning they do not break down over very long periods of time. Couple of centuries from now I wouldn’t be surprised if 20%+ of the oil still remained in the sediments.

  • Anonymous

    You haven’t learned about capitalism. BP would never do any clean up technique that would lead to knowing how much oil is spilled because then the government knows how much to fine them. Next time it happens, they will use massive amounts of toxic dispersant again to hide the quantity of oil just like this time.

    The fact that this is a second environmental crime slides by our Corporate Congress.

  • Anonymous

    I’m from the South, and I can tell you that we most certainly will. It’s not so much being stupid as being proud of our ignorance. It’s only maybe 55% to 60% of the people, but, sadly, that’s a majority.

  • Anonymous

    I feel you DFW. It ain’t easy being in a red zone.

    My own Congressman is second generation Republican silly. His Daddy went hunting in Africa as an effort to feed the poor. Duncan Hunter was his name. Jr. got the district.

    So political dynasties are born.

  • panamarick

    “procedures that worked terrific for the last 20 years became dysfunctional.”

    Reader,
    have you noticed that incompetence, and stupidity have become the latest get out of jail free card in our country? It’s right up there with the ever present republican mantra of “I don’t recall.”

    American absolutes : “There’s no law against being stupid, incompetent, a failing memory or being a liar.” These are the four legs of the republican platform. Through these mechanisms all criminality is possible and non-prosecutable.

  • Anonymous