Exclusive: I ‘wined and dined’ NYT and WSJ for favorable coverage, health insurance whistleblower says

By Brad Jacobson
Monday, December 13, 2010 8:54 EDT
google plus icon
  • Print Friendly and PDF
  • Email this page

“It was so easy for me to get my way”

A former health insurance insider turned whistleblower says that he was not only surprised at how “easy” it was to manipulate members of the news media over the years, but also reveals that he routinely “wined and dined” reporters from major news outlets – including the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal – in return for favorable coverage.

In his new book Deadly Spin, Wendell Potter describes how his chief function as a senior public relations officer at two of the largest for-profit health insurance companies in the United States – Humana and Cigna – was to “perpetuate myths that had no other purpose but to sustain those companies’ extraordinary high profitability.”

But in an extended interview with Raw Story last week, Potter went further, revealing that he lunched with reporters at major media outlets for years – including journalists at the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal – as well as those from local and regional media, in most cases picking up the tab, which he says directly resulted in positive coverage of the companies he represented.

In an email to Raw Story Sunday night, New York Times spokeswoman Danielle Rhoades Ha responded, “The claims are unsubstantiated and absurd since no names of reporters, examples of stories or other pertinent facts are provided to support these claims.”

Wall Street Journal spokeswoman Ashley Huston declined comment.

In a follow-up call Sunday night, Potter reiterated to Raw Story that he would not name reporters from the Times or the Journal who embraced such relationships with him because he did not want to single them out for embarrassment. He said that he engaged in this practice with many different major media outlets for years, but cited the Times and Journal to underscore that even the most venerable news sources took part.

Potter also said that he did not cite specific articles because it would have the same effect of outing those reporters.

He noted as well that these meetings with reporters were “a process that developed over time” and didn’t just result in influencing a handful of articles, but “many articles over the years,” even including ones which were generously spiked after such interactions.

“Just like lobbyists do for lawmakers”

“What you do, at least if you’re successful — and I was at Cigna for almost 15 years — you work to develop good relationships with reporters who are important to your company and to your industry,” he explained. “You give them special attention.”

“We would go to lunch whenever we could,” continued Potter, who, at the age of twenty-four, was covering the White House, Congress and the Supreme Court for Scripps Howard news service before going into public relations in the late 1970s.

He said that sitting across the table from someone helped to develop a better rapport than if they were always just “a voice at the end of a telephone line.”

“It was important for me I’ve always found to have a personal relationship with someone that’s based on going to lunch,” Potter said. “It was just part of what I did to try to make sure that my company’s point of view was included in their stories.”

He added, though, “I would essentially wine and dine them, just like lobbyists do for lawmakers.”

When Raw Story asked Potter if he meant that he literally picked up the tab for reporters, which, in turn, led to favorable coverage, he averred that was the case.

As an example of how he was also involved in this practice with some of the nation’s most well-respected news outlets, he noted that even reporters from the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal had taken part in such lunches.

He said that while some reporters over the years did decline to have their meals paid for, most of them agreed. And even those who would not let Potter pick up the tab still had no qualms about sharing lunch with him and allowing him to ingratiate himself, he said.

As for the reporters who agreed to have him pay for their meals, Potter said he was “absolutely” aware of the ethical issues involved for the journalists and their news outlets in agreeing to such a transaction.

Potter, who is currently the senior fellow on health care at the Center for Media and Democracy, said he has less of a problem with reporters who met him for lunch but made sure they paid for themselves.

“I see really nothing wrong with that,” he said.

But he then noted that whether he paid for their meals or not, many of the reporters whom he engaged with in such settings over the years didn’t seem to fully grasp the degree to which he was using them.

“Reporters should be mindful of what’s really going on,” Potter said. “They should be more aware of the game that’s being played. And I don’t think a lot of them really are.”

He added that they often confused responsiveness and attention with cooperation, but, in reality, he was only going “through the motions of being cooperative” and “was always certainly mindful of not disclosing anything the company didn’t want to be disclosed.”

Spent years planting stories in the media

Potter has pointed out his involvement in planting stories in the media as part of the health insurance industry’s campaign to de-legitimize Academy Award-winning filmmaker Michael Moore’s documentary “Sicko.”

He’s also cited CNN’s chief medical correspondent Sanjay Gupta and USA Today for treating the front group Health Care America as a viable source critical of “Sicko” rather than what it was – a sole creation of America’s Health Insurance Plans (AHIP), the insurers’ biggest trade group, and APCO Worldwide, a Washington-based PR firm that specializes in propping up front groups for major corporations and industries, such as for Phillip Morris and the tobacco industry during the 1990s.

But during the interview with Raw Story, Potter also acknowledged having planted stories in the media for years.

“Well, it’s just part of what you do,” he said. “Over time you’re always involved working with your colleagues in other companies to try to get the media to cover the industry more favorably.”

Potter, the self-described “gatekeeper” at Cigna to the CEO and other top executives for 15 years, also noted his surprise at the ease with which he was able to manipulate most reporters.

“You’d think that a PR guy for a big insurance company would get beaten up every now and then,” he said. “But it was so easy for me to get my way.”

Potter explained, for example, that if he really wanted to avoid a conversation with a reporter, he would simply issue a statement and usually send it by email.

“I wouldn’t even have to have a conversation,” he said. “I would essentially be saying, ‘Take it or leave it, this is what we’re saying about this.’ And they would just acquiesce.”

He said that it was “almost unheard of” for a reporter to ever push back, noting that “only a few reporters in my whole career really did all that significantly in terms of trying to get beyond the statement.”

Still regularly spots industry’s influence on news media

Potter said that industry spin may be nuanced but he often notices it in articles on health insurance, even in the country’s paper of record.

Citing the Times again, he said, “I’m not going to name names [of reporters], but even the New York Times has seen their reporting out of Washington being less than what you would think” regarding health insurance coverage.

“Probably most readers wouldn’t, but I can see how the stories that come together have been influenced by the industry in ways that I can spot,” Potter continued. “They’ve got the industry spin in it. And it’s not tough or hard-hitting, it doesn’t get into areas that really are important.”

One reason for this, he pointed out, might have to do with his surprise by the number of reporters covering the health insurance industry who not only lack expertise on the details of insurance policies and legislation but also the companies’ stealthy PR tactics.

Potter said that “most of the reporters” he encountered who covered health insurance and the industry “really didn’t have much of an understanding how it really works.”

He also noted that still seems to be the case today.

“So it was really easy for us to work with the media in ways that were very advantageous to us and to the insurance industry,” he said.

Brad Jacobson is a contributing investigative reporter for Raw Story. You can follow his Twitter feed at twitter.com/bradpjacobson.

By commenting, you agree to our terms of service
and to abide by our commenting policy.
  • Anonymous

    I’d like to see a regulation where they can not use my premium dollars to lobby and set up dirty tricks like they did at the “Town Hall Meetings.” It galls me that they paid for that shit with my money and yet I can’t drop health insurance coverage.

  • http://twitter.com/btmfdrsheaven rebecca meritt

    I hate this gambling on me,I bet the insurance co. I’m gonna get sick and they bet I’m not, they cover their bet with the next fools money and I have to ante up. These ins.co. should be suing BP for polluting,Chevron,ExxonMobil,the big pharm.co.s tobacco co.s and anyone else that creates health hazards not the gov. at my expense. I have to pay over and over ,my policy fee ,my taxes to go after polluters,and with my life or my neighbors life if we get sick. The CEO’s Brotherhood Union is a powerful force with our money.

  • Anonymous

    “I sure as heck know what I am doing … I’m working at a newspaper.”

    Wow thanks for the great joke!

  • Anonymous

    To the really intelligent posters here, I apologize for my rant below.

    I applaud Potter’s courage in coming forth about this manipulation of the press, although I’m a bit perplexed at his naivete when he says ‘Reporters should be mindful of what’s really going on…..They should be more aware of the game that’s being played. And I don’t think a lot of them really are.’ If these reporters aren’t aware of the “game” then their editors should be and they should stop this disregard for our collective intelligence by acting like there’s nothing wrong with this kind of sycophantic behavior. NYT spokesperson Rhoades has some nerve suggesting because Potter doesn’t name anyone such activity doesn’t take place. It has and still is taking place and the absence of any names associated with this behavior doesn’t make it less so…..and such a rationale coming from of all places the New York Times is the height of chutzpah, when that paper is full of people who allowed themselves to be administrative assistants to anyone in government who wined and dined them, or did less than that, in order to get a byline on the front page.

    Some of the wildest claims, next to ones about Obama being a secret Muslim and the sort, were made centered around the health care industry….death panels, etc. and most likely some of them came from such lunches. Thanks to Mr. Potter for his honesty; I hope he’ll contribute to the clean up. We need to get our house in order.

  • Anonymous

    I suspect this isn’t the whole truth. It’s like this. You now see BP ads all over the net and possibly on radio and tv. You think to yourself, shit, no one is stupid enough to buy this bullshit about caring about the gulf. What you may not understand is that they are spreading large amounts of money around to the various media. For that, they will get favorable news coverage. So, it isn’t about the people seeing the ads as much as it is about the people receiving the money for the ads, who have absolute power over news content.

    I suspect that this story, although interesting, could be falling short of the whole story. There is too much money at stake to let the spin hinge on a few prime rib dinners.

  • Anonymous

    They don’t have to buy you. They bought AP, NY TIMES, WASHINGTON POST et al. You are picking from a pool of already vetted stories.

  • Anonymous


  • Anonymous


  • Anonymous

    Mockingbird operatives all of them. Some know what they are. Most are useful idiots on the air and in print

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Bob-Zentrails/100001475536421 Bob Zentrails

    Hey, where’s Breitbart and his fake whores and fake pimps and hip mounted cameras.

    You’d think he’d be all over this. What is the name of his website again?
    BIG Something or other.

    BIG LIES, maybe? What are you getting from the Health Insurance Lobby, Breitbart?
    How about coming clean, fella?

    Hey Peter King, here’s something to have hearings about. Like that’s going to happen.

  • nycplayboy78


  • http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/XIWZRWAXJQKAJ4QEHKMVMCMLAY brian

    Everyone is easily bribed.

    If you do one little thing for someone, guess what? They’re greatful.

    People don’t think ‘what’s the catch?’. People like having nice things done for them and like to do nice things for others if they can.

    And there will always be people to take advantage of this.

  • http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/XIWZRWAXJQKAJ4QEHKMVMCMLAY brian

    Because they bought your editors and publishers.

    What ‘stop the presses’ items have you had published?

    Which of your stories have been killed or neutered?

    You’re just another dog. If you’re a good dog, you get a bone.

  • http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/XIWZRWAXJQKAJ4QEHKMVMCMLAY brian

    Yeah, people paid nothing and afraid to lose thier jobs are always the most pure and forthright.

  • Anonymous

    Wendell Potter is a hero and should be heard far and wide so everyone gets to know the thrashing that is forced onto the American people by the health insurers. Now the Republicans want to make the press even less investigative by defunding public broadcasting. Every citizen needs to wake up and wake up fast. We are getting a beating that will not be easy to recover from. When political campaigns are no longer funded by private donors, when we candidates are given equal time to inform their constituents and debate the issues, we’re going to keep on getting the equivalent of rich monkeys representing us.

  • Anonymous

    Why can’t we devise a system that rewards those who benefit the greatest number of people? We have so much today in the way of knowledge and information and yet we never discuss anything along these lines. We need to think about this and have our minds occupied with such things instead of jumping on a silly treadmill the Republicans conduct to keep everyone distracted (blocking everything, slashing funding, etc). We do have power but we need to be inspired. We hunger for ideas. We must never thing that we cannot change the system, we have to change it, because whoever gets in follows the same old distorted incentives. It’s just not working.