Judge denies motions by ACORN pranksters

By David Ferguson
Saturday, May 28, 2011 21:00 EDT
google plus icon
  • Print Friendly and PDF
  • Email this page

James O’Keefe and Hannah Giles, the “pimp” and “prostitute” of the notorious ACORN scam attempted to invoke the First Amendment as a hedge against a $75,000 lawsuit filed by ACORN employee Juan Carlos Vera under the California Privacy Act.

California federal judge M. James Lorenz has dismissed the argument, stating that since O’Keefe and Giles had established a mutual understanding with Vera that the conversation would remain confidential, rules protecting journalists did not apply.

Additionally, Giles attempted to shift the onus of the blame for the prank entirely to O’Keefe, in that he wore the camera used to record the conversations. Judge Lorenz denied that motion as well, ruling that the Law “is directed to the surreptitious recording of confidential communications and not the manner or method of recording the conversation”, meaning Giles bears equal culpability in the suit.

(h/t to Crooks and Liars)

David Ferguson
David Ferguson
David Ferguson is an editor at Raw Story. He was previously writer and radio producer in Athens, Georgia, hosting two shows for Georgia Public Broadcasting and blogging at Firedoglake.com and elsewhere. He is currently working on a book.
By commenting, you agree to our terms of service
and to abide by our commenting policy.