Quantcast

Iran remains defiant on nuclear program

By Agence France-Presse
Wednesday, November 9, 2011 7:41 EDT
google plus icon
irannuclear_afp
 
  • Print Friendly and PDF
  • Email this page

Iran vowed Wednesday it “will not budge an iota” from its nuclear path despite a new UN report hardening suspicions it is seeking atomic weapons, as an Iranian general warned Israel of “destruction” if it launched an attack.

The words of defiance fell while the United States and its allies said they were looking at imposing more sanctions on Iran, and Tehran’s chief ally, China, urged the Islamic republic to cooperate with the UN’s International Atomic Energy Agency.

The IAEA report Tuesday said “credible” evidence existed of Iran working towards making nuclear warheads to fit inside Shahab-3 medium-range missiles.

Iranian officials immediately characterised the report as “baseless” and hewing to intelligence provided by Iran’s arch-foe the United States.

President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said Wednesday in a speech broadcast on state television: “We will not budge an iota from the path we are committed to.”

He reiterated that, contrary to the IAEA report, Iran’s nuclear programme was exclusively peaceful in nature, saying “we don’t need the atomic bomb.”

His deputy armed forces chief, Brigadier General Masoud Jazayeri, warned however that any sign of Israel carrying out threats to attack Iran’s nuclear sites “will see its destruction.”

Jazayeri said in an interview with Iran’s Arabic-language channel Al-Alam that the Israeli nuclear site of Dimona was “the most accessible” target.

But he also stated that “our response would not be limited to the Middle East.”

Israeli officials had no immediate reaction to the IAEA report. But Israeli President Shimon Peres said at the weekend the likelihood of an attack on Iran was becoming “more and more likely.”

Amid the hard language in the IAEA report and the threats of Israeli military action, the United States and its allies were talking up the possibility of additional sanctions on Iran.

A senior US official speaking on condition of anonymity said: “We don’t take anything off the table when we look at sanctions. We believe there is a broad spectrum of action we could take.”

France’s foreign ministry issued a statement saying “we are prepared to adopt… unprecedented sanctions” should Iran refuse to cooperate with the IAEA.

German Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle said in the case of Iranian intransigence, “more severe sanctions would be inevitable” but stressed “we rule out all discussion on a possible military option.”

A spokeswoman for the European Union’s foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton said the IAEA’s report “seriously aggravates existing concerns” and the 27-nation bloc was working on “an adequate reaction.”

Ashton represents the six world powers — Britain, China, France, Germany, Russia and the United States — in stalled negotiations with Iran aimed at convincing Tehran to freeze its uranium enrichment activities.

Although China and Russia — which both wield veto power in the UN Security Council — have been reluctant to impose further sanctions on Iran, China on Wednesday urged Iran to show “flexibility and sincerity” in the wake of the IAEA report.

Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Hong Lei said Beijing was still studying the document but called on Iran to “engage in serious cooperation” with the nuclear agency.

Russia was angry over the report’s release, saying it damaged the chance of renewing the nuclear talks.

The report itself stated that the IAEA had “serious concerns” Iran “has carried out activities relevant to the development of a nuclear explosive device.”

Although it stopped short of making an outright accusation of weapons programmes, it detailed activities it said showed computer modelling of a nuclear warhead, testing explosives in a large chamber at the Parchin military base near Tehran and studying how to arm a Shahab-3 missile with an atomic warhead.

Iran’s envoy to the IAEA, Ali Asghar Soltanieh, said the allegations were “baseless” and insisted his country “will continue its peaceful nuclear activities.”

He accused IAEA chief Yukiya Amano of being “unbalanced, unprofessional and political” and making a “historic mistake” in releasing the document.

Analysts said that while the report was important for showing Iranian activity that could relate to nuclear weapons production, there was no “smoking gun” proving Tehran was on the verge of making an atomic bomb.

“This isn’t new blockbuster information,” Peter Crail from the Arms Control Association in Washington told AFP.

The Institute for Science and International Security said it was notable that the report lacked “any assessment by the IAEA of Iran’s capability to make a nuclear explosive device based on what is learned through these activities.”

Amir Mohebian, an Iranian analyst at a moderate-conservative think-tank in Tehran, said the report seemed designed to increase pressure on Iran and set the scene for possible small-scale air strikes.

“Both acts have one message, and that is death of diplomacy. And this is dangerous,” he said.

“America thinks that what occured in Libya can occur in Iran, but there are fundamental differences between the two nations. (US President Barack) Obama unfortunately has fallen to the trap set by Israel, which itself is under pressure in the region,” he said.

Agence France-Presse
Agence France-Presse
AFP journalists cover wars, conflicts, politics, science, health, the environment, technology, fashion, entertainment, the offbeat, sports and a whole lot more in text, photographs, video, graphics and online.
 
 
 
 
By commenting, you agree to our terms of service
and to abide by our commenting policy.
 
Google+