Pet owners urge ban on dog devocalization

By Eric W. Dolan
Sunday, December 4, 2011 15:28 EDT
google plus icon
  • Print Friendly and PDF
  • Email this page

A controversial procedure performed on dogs and cats known as devocalization or debarking has upset animal lovers, who are now pushing to have the surgery outlawed.

Debarking involves surgically removing an animal’s vocal cords to reduce the sound of the animal’s vocalizations.

“I don’t think it’s the right thing to do,” Susan Rawson told WVIT. Her adopted 11-year-old Collie, a former show dog, was devocalized by his previous owner.

“It’s like declawing cats, or taking the voice box out of a baby,” she added. “That’s how they communicate, that’s how they talk. So I think it’s very cruel.”

Massachusetts and New Jersey are the only states to have banned the surgery, which critics decry as mutilation for the convenience for pet owners.

“Debarks are also a big problem because if the pet ever needs anesthesia in the future, the scar tissue that forms in the throat prevents the insertion of the correct size breathing tube — making anesthesia even more of a risk for the pet,” Dr. Cary Waterhouse of Lake Union Veterinary Clinic in Seattle explained to KVUE.com.

The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA) says the surgery should only be performed if “the animal is at risk of losing his home or his life.”

The procedure is banned under the European Convention for the Protection of Pet Animals. The United Kingdom has also outlawed the surgery.

Watch video, courtesy of Al Jazeera English, below:

Eric W. Dolan
Eric W. Dolan
Eric W. Dolan has served as an editor for Raw Story since August 2010, and is based out of Sacramento, California. He grew up in the suburbs of Chicago and received a Bachelor of Science from Bradley University. Eric is also the publisher and editor of PsyPost. You can follow him on Twitter @ewdolan.
By commenting, you agree to our terms of service
and to abide by our commenting policy.