Five alleged al-Qaeda conspirators accused of aiding the 9/11 hijackers all say they were tortured for years while in CIA custody, but sitting in a military courtroom on Monday, they all heard a judge insist that “torture” is not “relevant” to their cases.
Critics of the Bush administration’s torture program have long argued that it could taint prosecutions with evidence obtained under duress, which is exactly what defense attorneys have argued on behalf of defendants Walid bin Attash, Mustafa Ahmad al-Hawsawi, Ramzi Binalshibh, Ali Abd al-Aziz Ali, and alleged 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed.
In an exchange captured by Reuters, Army Col. James Pohl, the judge in the military tribunal, curtly refused a motion by Mohammed’s attorney, Air Force Cpt. Michael Schwartz, who argued that his client’s experience being tortured must be discussed.
“We have to talk about torture,” Schwartz said.
“No we don’t,” the judge replied.
“I think we do,” Schwartz said.
“I’m telling you I don’t think that’s relevant to this issue. That’s the end of that,” Pohl snapped.
When Schwartz persisted, Pohl said angrily, “Are you having trouble hearing me? Move on to something else!”
Mohammed allegedly admitted that he helped plan the attacks after being kept awake for seven and a half days straight, according to José Rodriguez Jr., a former CIA agent whose recently published book, “Hard Measures,” advocates torture.
Col. Pohl ultimately ruled that the defendants would be allowed to boycott their trial, which could result in the death penalty, but they’re required to sign a form for every day of court they miss, acknowledging that they understand the potential consequences.
Only two of the defendants, Ramzi Binalshibh and Walid bin Attash, appeared in court on Tuesday, according to The Associated Press. “I don’t think there is any justice in this court,” Mohammed reportedly said.
Raw Story is a progressive news site that focuses on stories often ignored in the mainstream media. While giving coverage to the big stories of the day, we also bring our readers' attention to policy, politics, legal and human rights stories that get ignored in an infotainment culture driven solely by pageviews.
Founded in 2004, Raw Story reaches 5 million unique readers per month and serves more than 19 million pageviews.