UN not after Internet ‘kill switch’ or any disruptive regulations: official

By Stephen C. Webster
Monday, December 3, 2012 13:21 EDT
google plus icon
An illustration depicting a global network. Photo: Shutterstock.com, all rights reserved.
  • Print Friendly and PDF
  • Email this page

The head of the United Nations’ International Telecommunications Union (ITU) said Monday that despite all the rumors about a so-called “kill switch” or takeover of the Internet are simply unfounded.

The ITU convened Monday in Dubai to begin discussing proposals for global Internet regulations submitted by 123 member states, including the U.S. Proposals submitted by the various countries represented at the ITU span the range of ideas from complete deregulation to stakeholder control to complete government control, up to and including censorship.

However, speaking to reporters Monday morning, ITU Secretary General Hamdoun Toure insisted that no major changes will be implemented. “Nothing can stop the freedom of expression in the world today, and nothing in this conference will be about it,” he said, according to The Economic Times. “I have not mentioned anything about controlling the Internet.”

He added that pointing to an individual country, like China, proposing censorship controls for governments is not representative of the body as a whole. “I find it a very cheap way of attacking [the conference],” Toure reportedly said.

In addition, the ITU’s public preamble on treaty negotiations explicitly says that no action taken by the organization will prevent member states from regulating telecommunications within their own borders. Instead, it says that member states “may apply these rules,” whatever they turn out to be.

Concern about the treaty-writing conference, which may not even produce a treaty, has whipped into a frenzy in recent years as major telecoms, content providers and governments fret over a bevy of misinformation about who actually controls the global networks and where that control will shift to next.

Talk of a so-called Internet “kill switch” in particular has been overblown since it was first reported in 2010. The claim apparently arose out of a misreading of a cyber security proposal circulating in the U.S. Senate, which ultimately failed to pass.

“In the coming days, we will revise the agreement that underpins how we communicate with each other across the globe,” U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon said in a video to ITU delegates, according to an advisory. “Our overall objective must be to ensure universal access to information and communication technology to the two-thirds of the world’s population not online. A digital divide has no place in the information age and 21st century digital economy. The management of information and communication technology should be transparent, democratic and inclusive.”

Photo: Shutterstock.com, all rights reserved.

Stephen C. Webster
Stephen C. Webster
Stephen C. Webster is the senior editor of Raw Story, and is based out of Austin, Texas. He previously worked as the associate editor of The Lone Star Iconoclast in Crawford, Texas, where he covered state politics and the peace movement’s resurgence at the start of the Iraq war. Webster has also contributed to publications such as True/Slant, Austin Monthly, The Dallas Business Journal, The Dallas Morning News, Fort Worth Weekly, The News Connection and others. Follow him on Twitter at @StephenCWebster.
By commenting, you agree to our terms of service
and to abide by our commenting policy.