Quantcast

Original Prop 8 challengers address Supreme Court

By David Ferguson
Thursday, February 21, 2013 14:52 EDT
google plus icon
Kristen Perry and Sandra Stier via screencap
 
  • Print Friendly and PDF
  • Email this page

Nearly four years after filing their challenge to California’s Proposition 8, attorneys Ted Olson and David Boies filed their case with the U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday. According to Buzzfeed, the legal team argued that the Constitution “does not tolerate the permanent exclusion of gay men and lesbians from the most important relation in life,” i.e., marriage.

Olson and Boies represent two California same sex couples who are unable to marry in the state. Their case argues broadly that to deny same sex couples the right to marry is unconstitutional and, more narrowly, that Proposition 8, which passed in November of 2008, is an unconstitutional encroachment on individual freedoms.

“The unmistakable purpose and effect of Proposition 8 is to stigmatize gay men and lesbians—and them alone—and enshrine in California’s Constitution that they are ‘unequal to everyone else,’” read the attorneys’ complaint.

The court is expected to hear the case in late March and to reach a decision in June.

Read the suit, embedded below via Scribd:

Perry Respondents' Merits Brief by

Watch video of plaintiffs Kristen Perry and Sandra Stier reacting to news of Prop 8 being overturned in 2011, embedded below:

David Ferguson
David Ferguson
David Ferguson is an editor at Raw Story. He was previously writer and radio producer in Athens, Georgia, hosting two shows for Georgia Public Broadcasting and blogging at Firedoglake.com and elsewhere. He is currently working on a book.
 
 
 
 
By commenting, you agree to our terms of service
and to abide by our commenting policy.
 
Google+