Controversy erupts over where Richard III’s recently discovered bones will be buried

By Agence France-Presse
Tuesday, February 26, 2013 3:52 EDT
google plus icon
Michael Ibsen, a descendant of England’s King Richard III, poses for pictures with a plastic model made from the recently discovered skull of the king, in London on Tuesday via AFP
  • Print Friendly and PDF
  • Email this page

Justice minister Thomas McNally said parliament should not intervene in the row over where the recently uncovered remains of Richard III will be buried.

In a letter issued the day after descendants of the monarch called for the remains to be interred in York, McNally said the decision was to be made by the University of Leicester, which made the discovery.

“They have indicated that they intend to reinter the remains in Leicester Cathedral, which is one of the possible locations referred to in the licence,” he wrote.

The Ministry of Justice licence to exhume the body was issued shortly after the remains, discovered under a Leicester car park, were identified as Richard’s.

Nine of the king’s descendants on Sunday said in an open letter that their ancestor would want to be buried in York, the city which gave its name to his royal house.

Richard ruled for two years until his death in 1485 in the Battle of Bosworth Field the decisive batle of the Wars of the Roses which ended the Plantagenet line of monarchs and ushered in the Tudors.

Agence France-Presse
Agence France-Presse
AFP journalists cover wars, conflicts, politics, science, health, the environment, technology, fashion, entertainment, the offbeat, sports and a whole lot more in text, photographs, video, graphics and online.
By commenting, you agree to our terms of service
and to abide by our commenting policy.