Quantcast

Steve King: ‘No logical reason ballots should be in anything other than English’

By David Edwards
Friday, July 19, 2013 13:09 EDT
google plus icon
Steve King speaks at House hearing
 
  • Print Friendly and PDF
  • Email this page

Rep. Steve King (R-IA) on Thursday said that if Congress decides to patch the Voting Rights Act after the Supreme Court recent declared parts of it unconstitutional then there would be “no logical reason ballots should be in anything other than English.”

During a House Subcommittee on the Constitution and Civil Justice hearing, King insisted that fellow lawmakers who thought that “preclearance” of election law changes was a “reasonable device” should also think that “voter ID would be a reasonable device.”

“I wouldn’t know where to go look to find real voter intimidation and real discrimination,” King opined. “So I think there is more damage that comes to our election system from lack of voter ID then might come from voter intimidation.”

“And when I think about the discussion about bringing up the Voting Rights Act and perhaps re-writing it, that would mean that the authorization would be also subject,” he continued. “And I question the wisdom of an authorization that would last for more than a generation, 25 years… and so the 25-year re-authorization of 2006, I thought was imprudent. That’s one of the reasons I voted against it.”

King added that he wanted to see “improvement in the integrity of the individual ballot.”

“I think if we bring up the Voting Rights Act and we have an opportunity then to open it up, I think multilingual ballots become a question,” he suggested. “There’s no logical reason that ballots should be in anything other than English. If you take a citizenship test, that’s the English — you have to demonstrate proficiency in English.”

In 1975, Congress added Section 203 of the Voting Rights Act because it found that “through the use of various practices and procedures, citizens of language minorities have been effectively excluded from participation in the electoral process.”

Section 203 requires locations that have a population of more than 5 percent of non-Eglish speakers to provide multilingual ballots.

While King is correct that citizenship applicants are required to take naturalization tests in English, exemptions are possible for older people and those with mental and physical disabilities. It is also not unusual for natural-born citizens with immigrant parents and Native Americans to not speak English as their primary language.

Listen to this audio from the U.S. House, broadcast July 18, 2013.

 

(h/t: NBC News)

David Edwards
David Edwards
David Edwards has served as an editor at Raw Story since 2006. His work can also be found at Crooks & Liars, and he's also been published at The BRAD BLOG. He came to Raw Story after working as a network manager for the state of North Carolina and as as engineer developing enterprise resource planning software. Follow him on Twitter at @DavidEdwards.
 
 
 
 
By commenting, you agree to our terms of service
and to abide by our commenting policy.
 
Google+