NYT editor: ‘Disruptive’ Nate Silver never ‘fit into the Times culture’

By Stephen C. Webster
Monday, July 22, 2013 16:10 EDT
google plus icon
NYT pollster Nate Silver. Photo: Screenshot via TeamCoco.com.
  • Print Friendly and PDF
  • Email this page

Famed polling analyst Nate Silver was quietly seen by some at The New York Times as “disruptive” and many were glad to see him depart for ESPN, editor Margaret Sullivan disclosed in a blog post on Monday.

“I don’t think Nate Silver ever really fit into the Times culture and I think he was aware of that,” she wrote. “He was, in a word, disruptive. Much like the Brad Pitt character in the movie ‘Moneyball’ disrupted the old model of how to scout baseball players, Nate disrupted the traditional model of how to cover politics.”

Sullivan went on to explain that several “traditional and well-respected Times journalists disliked his work,” and objected when she wanted to carry it in the Times print edition. “They were also tough on me for seeming to endorse what he wrote, since I was suggesting that it get more visibility,” she noted.

“Many others, of course, in The Times’s newsroom did appreciate his work and the innovation (not to mention the traffic) that he brought, and liked his humility,” she added, saying that she counts herself among those who were fond of Silver personally and admired his work.

(H/T: TPM)

Stephen C. Webster
Stephen C. Webster
Stephen C. Webster is the senior editor of Raw Story, and is based out of Austin, Texas. He previously worked as the associate editor of The Lone Star Iconoclast in Crawford, Texas, where he covered state politics and the peace movement’s resurgence at the start of the Iraq war. Webster has also contributed to publications such as True/Slant, Austin Monthly, The Dallas Business Journal, The Dallas Morning News, Fort Worth Weekly, The News Connection and others. Follow him on Twitter at @StephenCWebster.
By commenting, you agree to our terms of service
and to abide by our commenting policy.