NC defends governor’s ban on NAACP protests by warning about ‘womanless’ marriages

By David Edwards
Monday, December 23, 2013 16:17 EDT
google plus icon
Judge Allen Baddour (NAACP
  • Print Friendly and PDF
  • Email this page

A Superior Court judge in Raleigh on Monday gave the NAACP permission to rally at the State Capital building to protest the Republican-controlled legislature after Gov. Pat McCrory’s (R) administration refused to approve a permit for the group.

NAACP attorney Scott Holmes told Judge Allen Baddour that the state’s action’s were unconstitutional because the state had claimed that the permit had been denied because the event would have more than 100 people. But hundreds of people attended a Christmas tree lighting ceremony with Gov. McCrory in the same area earlier this month.

“What’s really going on here is that the state has preferred speech and non-preferred speech,” Holmes explained. “They prefer government speech over the people’s speech. And that’s unconstitutional.”

Special Deputy Attorney General Don Teeter, however, insisted that “the Department of Administration and its directors do not care what speech is rendered by an applicant. We don’t even ask for it.”

Baddour pointed out to Teeter that the applicant was required to “provide goals, objectives and purpose” on the permit application.

“You just told me you didn’t care and you didn’t ask,” Baddour said.

“We want to know what they’re going to do there,” Teeter replied. “Are they going to roast a goat? Are they going to have a womanless wedding? Are they going to have a prayer vigil? Are they going to have a rally? That’s the kind of thing we want to know. We don’t care what they say while they do it.”

“I reject the argument that we are limiting speech at all,” he later added. “These folks have been permitted to go to an appropriate area to speak to their hearts’ content.”

But Baddour ruled that he had no choice but to grant a temporary restraining order, blocking the Department of Administration’s decision not to approve the permit.

The judge said that he suspected that the administration’s ban on the NAACP was “either discretionary or content based.”

David Edwards
David Edwards
David Edwards has served as an editor at Raw Story since 2006. His work can also be found at Crooks & Liars, and he's also been published at The BRAD BLOG. He came to Raw Story after working as a network manager for the state of North Carolina and as as engineer developing enterprise resource planning software. Follow him on Twitter at @DavidEdwards.
By commenting, you agree to our terms of service
and to abide by our commenting policy.