Quantcast

British court quashes legal challenge by Glenn Greenwald’s partner David Miranda

By Reuters
Wednesday, February 19, 2014 7:07 EDT
google plus icon
David Miranda, partner of Glenn Greenwald (not seen), American journalist who first published the documents leaked by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden, looks on as Greenwald testifies in front of the Brazilian Federal Senate's Parliamentary Inquiry Committee, established to investigate allegations of spying by United States on Brazil, in Brasilia October 9, 2013. REUTERS/Ueslei Marcelino
 
  • Print Friendly and PDF
  • Email this page

Britain’s High Court has quashed a legal challenge against the detention under anti-terrorism laws of the partner of Glenn Greenwald, the journalist who brought leaks from former U.S. spy agency contractor Edward Snowden to world attention.

David Miranda had appealed against his detention and nine-hour questioning under anti-terrorism legislation last August when he landed at London’s Heathrow Airport en route from Berlin to Rio De Janeiro, Brazil.

British authorities seized items from Miranda which they said included electronic media containing 58,000 documents from the U.S. National Security Agency, Snowden’s former employer, and from its British counterpart, Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ).

The High Court ruled on Wednesday that the detention of the partner of the ex-Guardian newspaper reporter was lawful.

“In my judgment the Schedule 7 (of the Terrorism Act) stop was a proportionate measure in the circumstances,” said Judge John Laws.

“Its objective was not only legitimate, but very pressing.”

The ruling also criticized Greenwald’s evidence that journalists share with government the responsibility to decide what should not be published to protect national security.

“Journalists have no such constitutional responsibility,” the ruling said.

“The journalist will have his own take or focus on what serves the public interest, for which he is not answerable to the public through Parliament.”

Miranda’s lawyers said they had applied for permission to appeal against the decision and that journalists were now finding alternative ways to protect material when travelling through Britain.

“We look forward to the Court of Appeal considering the fundamentally important legal issues raised in our appeal in due course,” said Gwendolen Morgan.

“Whilst the courts consider our appeal, we understand that journalists are making alternative travel plans to safeguard their material, sources and confidential working systems when they have to travel via the UK.”

(Reporting By Costas Pitas; editing by Stephen Addison)

Reuters
Reuters
Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in business, politics, technology, and more.
 
 
 
 
By commenting, you agree to our terms of service
and to abide by our commenting policy.
 
Google+