The return of the son of the bride of ‘This is why we can’t have nice things’

By TBogg
Monday, March 17, 2014 19:42 EDT
google plus icon
  • Print Friendly and PDF
  • Email this page

Last week the wise and wonderful Charles Pierce lamented the malaise-y Democratic base which can’t seem to put down their lattes and kale wraps and go vote in the damn midterm elections. He wrote:

Somebody is going to have to explain to me why the Democratic “base,” which is presumably younger and more spry than the older and whiter Republican “base,” is nonetheless less likely to turn out for midterm elections than the That Sean Hannity Reminds Me Of My Grandson crowd. It is taken as a given, and past performance indicates clearly that it’s usually the case, but I’m not sure why it has to be. So, in the interest to changing this curious dynamic, let me take this red-hot poker and shove it up the base’s ass.

Responding to Mr. Pierce’s $6 Billion Dollar Question, Milt Shook at Please…Cut The Crap (reprinted almost in its entirety with his permission, but please visit his blog) wrote :

…left the link in the “red-hot poker” portion of the comment in there, because it shows what we’re actually up against this year. It’s not pretty, and the equivocating has to stop. There is no similarity between Democrats and Republicans these days, anymore than you can claim a rational comparison between a cold sore and cancer.

But let’s explain this to Charlie, since he asked:

The easy answer, Charlie, is that many, if not most, of the people who proclaim themselves the Democratic “base” are actually anything but. Among these are a bunch of self-proclaimed (mostly white and not poor) progressives who complain about Democrats more than they complain about the current incarnation of the Republican Party. They seem to imagine themselves political experts, even though their actions show a profound ignorance of the real process. Many of them aren’t even registered Democratic, nor would they deign to set foot in a Democratic caucus of any kind. They’re not the “base,” by any stretch.

About 40 years ago, a large group of progressives took themselves out of the system and headed out on their own, because they claimed the Democratic Party wasn’t sufficiently valuing the progressive movement. This was in the wake of a supermajority in Congress passing the Civil Rights and Voting Rights Acts, as well as OSHA, Medicare, Medicaid and lots of environmental legislation for the first time. But because few could get excited over George McGovern’s candidacy, it was the Democrats’ fault. These progressives started calling themselves the “Democratic base” and started shouting demands at the Party, but they still largely refuse to take part in the real process.

Worse, they are not only negative themselves, but their rhetoric also serves to help the Republicans in their strategy to depress turnout, by trashing Democrats with far more force than they trash the country’s real problem which, again, is the GOP. This is because they value their own ideological purity more highly than real progressive politics, where the country moves forward and makes thing better for everyone. As such, they would rather vote for a third-party candidate who says all the right things, but who has zero chance of winning, than to vote for a viable candidate who “only” agrees with them 80 percent of the time. And they don’t seem to notice that voting for third parties makes it more likely that a Republican will win, in part because they’ll never vote for a third-party. If Saint Reagan came back from the dead and ran as a member of the Zombie Party, the GOP base would still vote for the Republican.

That’s it in a nutshell. While the GOP base is older, more racist and more bigoted, they can be counted upon to show up at the polls, en masse, to vote for their Party. Meanwhile, a significant part of the Democratic “base” doesn’t show up at all, because they’re waiting for a massive wave of ideologically pure candidates to magically pop up, en masse. What’s worse is, they also undermine the viable political party that is closest to them ideologically, and barely talks about the other one.

And that’s the problem, Charlie. Much of the Democratic “base” simply isn’t their “base.”

This has been a bugaboo of mine since, well, way before this.

Two points I would like to add:

First, for many young voters, the midterms lack the glamor of the Whole Enchilada Presidential Election. While the fortunes of the major parties can swing wildly every two years, it’s the Presidential years that gets everyone’s juices flowing.

It’s like this: US Swimming holds a national championship meet every year. Do you care? Probably not. But come Olympics time every four years, and suddenly America finds Michael Phelps fascinating and we have this national orgy of watching other sports that we find even less interesting than watching people swim (hard to believe, but there are some) because…USA! USA! USA! Then back to three years of… whatevs.

No one ever makes a point of letting people know who they voted for to be be their Representative in the House, because, few people even know who their Rep is. But the President? That guy is on TV. He’s a somebody.

Only the truly hardcore (people like yourself because otherwise you would probably be at TMZ) care about every pitch, tremor, and roll of the political landscape.

Which gets me to my second point.

As pioneered by our old friend Ralph Nader, with some backing from conservatives, we now have the fine art of peeling off the  disaffected, by which I mean, in  these heady days, the ‘bro-dude’ segment which has a technology-sector boner for the likes of Rand Paul. Although they claim to be socially liberal, mention the fact that Republicans are closing down women’s healthcare clinics and they’ll tell you that “Clapper lied!” Some Republicans, like Rand Paul,  question the need for minimum wage laws, and you get “Drones!” Gay marriage…. “NSA!” You get the idea.

All of those are real  problems for real Americans, but some are more real on a daily basis for most Americans.  But for the bro-dude faction which is generally white, male, young, employed, privileged and tech-obsessed, it all get filed  under what Nader once called “gonadal politics.”

If it’s not in their wheelhouse and if it affects someone else, here: have a bitcoin and call someone who cares.

Which is where we are headed in 2016, after a possible debacle in 2014, for all of the aforementioned reasons.

Because, even though the issues are still as big as ever,  some folks concerns for anyone other than themselves has gotten infinitesimally smaller….

[Voting stickers on Shutterstock]

By commenting, you agree to our terms of service
and to abide by our commenting policy.