Quantcast

Supreme Court declines early look at tea party activist’s NSA surveillance case

By Reuters
Monday, April 7, 2014 11:18 EDT
google plus icon
Tea Party activist Larry Klayman [CNN]
 
  • Print Friendly and PDF
  • Email this page

By Lawrence Hurley

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday turned down a long-shot request for a ruling on whether the U.S. government’s gathering of Americans’ phone records is unlawful.

The justices’ refusal to intervene means the case will go forward in the appeals court, as scheduled.

Plaintiffs Larry Klayman and Charles Strange had said the issue was so important the high court should not wait for a Washington federal appeals court to rule in the case concerning the National Security Agency.

The high court rarely hears an appeal before an appeals court has ruled.

The Supreme Court will likely be asked to hear the case after the appeals court issues its ruling.

Former NSA contractor Edward Snowden disclosed the massive phone record collection to U.S. and British media in June 2013. Documents provided by Snowden showed a U.S. surveillance court had secretly approved the collection of millions of raw daily phone records in America, such as the length of calls and the numbers dialed.

Klayman is a conservative lawyer and Strange is the father of a U.S. cryptologist technician killed in Afghanistan in 2011. They won the case in U.S. District Court in Washington in December. U.S. District Judge Richard Leon ruled that the program was likely unlawful, and the government appealed.

The case is Klayman v. Obama, U.S. Supreme Court, 13-931.

(Editing by Howard Goller and Bernadette Baum)

Reuters
Reuters
Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in business, politics, technology, and more.
 
 
 
 
By commenting, you agree to our terms of service
and to abide by our commenting policy.
 
Google+