Quantcast

Rachel Maddow mocks 50-year history of ‘hysteria’ surrounding anti-pollution laws

By Arturo Garcia
Monday, June 2, 2014 23:54 EDT
google plus icon
Rachel Maddow talks about Bridgegate Jan 8 2014
 
  • Print Friendly and PDF
  • Email this page

MSNBC host Rachel Maddow looked back on Monday at the private sector’s long history of complaining whenever the U.S. took steps to address air pollution — a tradition that was reignited by the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) latest plan to cut carbon dioxide emissions.

“As usual, as is the case of every previous advance in our nation over the last 50 years, critics are now saying actually that we need to keep all this pollution, we can’t get rid of this pollution, these efforts to get rid of this pollution will destroy the American economy,” Maddow said.

She then sarcastically quoted a statement from Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) saying the new legislation represented a “dagger to the middle class.”

“Critics have always made arguments like this about trying to control pollution,” Maddow said of McConnell’s sentiment. “It’s an odd form of hysteria. You can set your watch to it.”

The latest round of economic fretting, she said, was caused by the EPA’s ruling on Monday that the country’s power sector must cut CO2 emissions by 30 percent by the year 2030.

“The two biggest contributors to greenhouse gases are the kind of pollution that causes climate change,” she said. “The two biggest contributors are vehicles — tailpipe emissions — and power plants. The Obama administration has now acted aggressively on both of those two sources of pollution.”

The agency has such jurisdiction following a 2007 Supreme Court verdict that said the EPA could enact regulations regarding greenhouse gas emissions under the auspices of the Clean Air Act of 1980.

But auto industry leaders, Maddow explained, have long strained when told to adapt to new regulations. Then-Ford Motors president Lee Iacocca complained in 1970, for example, that that year’s version of the Clean Air Act could imperil the company’s production efforts in the U.S. Four years earlier, chief executive officer Henry Ford II told lawmakers that the company would “have to close down” if the U.S. passed a law mandating seatbelts be installed in every new vehicle.

“Needless to say, the seat belt law passed, and Ford did not have to close down,” Maddow said. “They didn’t have to close down because of the seat belts, they didn’t have to close down because they had to put in catalytic converters and eventually meet mileage standards. And the Clean Air Act of 1970 did help, in terms of air pollution.”

Watch Maddow’s commentary, as aired Monday on MSNBC, below.

Arturo Garcia
Arturo Garcia
Arturo R. García is the managing editor at Racialicious.com. He is based in San Diego, California and has written for both print and broadcast media, including contributions to GlobalComment.com, The Root and Comment Is Free. Follow him on Twitter at @ABoyNamedArt
 
 
 
 
By commenting, you agree to our terms of service
and to abide by our commenting policy.
 
Google+