Quantcast

Texas judge ignores DNA tests, refuses parental rights because gay dads are married

By David Edwards
Thursday, June 19, 2014 8:53 EDT
google plus icon
Jason Hanna and Joe Riggs (KDFW)
 
  • Print Friendly and PDF
  • Email this page

A judge in Texas has refused to list two fathers on the birth certificates of their children because the men are gay.

Same-sex couple Jason Hanna and Joe Riggs, who were legally married in Washington, D.C., both have biological children, who share the same surrogate mother. Neither of the men are listed on their biological child’s birth certificate.

Hanna and Riggs had asked a judge to legally recognize them as a family by listing both men on both of the children’s birth certificates. Last week, a judge denied their petition.

“On one hand, it’s a little scary because as of right now, we don’t have full parental rights of our own biological children,” Hanna told KDFW.

“Actually, I think that’s what surprised me the most was a family court,” Riggs noted. “I guess I expected them to be looking out for the best interest of our kids, and I felt we walked out that day and it wasn’t in the best interest of our kids.”

Hanna explained to SiriusXM Progress this week that they had provided the court with DNA test results to prove paternity, but the Texas judge refused to put two men on one birth certificate.

“As of right now in Texas two men cannot be on the birth certificate,” Hanna said. “So our attorney followed the letter of the law. We petitioned the court. We had DNA testing there [in court] and petitioned the judge to ultimately remove the surrogate mother from the birth certificate, who has no biological ties to the boys. We would like each biological dad to be placed on the birth certificate of our own son, and then ultimately proceed to the second-parent adoption. The entire petition was denied.”

The New Civil Rights Movement’s David Badash pointed out that the reason the judge refused to put each father’s name on his biological child’s birth certificates was “because the men are gay and Texas does not recognize same-sex marriage.”

“But even if they were straight, they wouldn’t have to go to court to be listed as fathers — the hospital would just automatically list them as they do every day of the year,” Badash wrote.

GLAAD’s Alexandra Bolles noted that in Texas — and 17 other states — judges had discretion to decide if LGBT parents could adopt because the law was “unclear” on the subject.

The judge in this case insisted to KDFW that she was “strictly” following the law.

Both Hanna and Riggs have vowed to continue fighting for their children.

Earlier this year, a federal judge ruled that the Texas ban on same-sex marriage was unconstitutional because it violated the guarantee of equal protection and due process, but the ruling was stayed pending an appeal.

Hanna and Riggs could have an easier time adopting their children if the same-sex marriage ruling is upheld in a federal appeals court.

Watch the video below from KDFW, broadcast June 15, 2104.

Dallas News | myFOXdfw.com

David Edwards
David Edwards
David Edwards has served as an editor at Raw Story since 2006. His work can also be found at Crooks & Liars, and he's also been published at The BRAD BLOG. He came to Raw Story after working as a network manager for the state of North Carolina and as as engineer developing enterprise resource planning software. Follow him on Twitter at @DavidEdwards.
 
 
 
 
By commenting, you agree to our terms of service
and to abide by our commenting policy.
 
Google+