IMF reforms to double capital, give China, India more power

By Agence France-Presse
Saturday, November 6, 2010 12:00 EDT
 

The International Monetary Fund has decided to double its capital and adopted other reforms that will give China and other emerging-market economies a greater say in the financial institution.

The IMF executive board agreed to sweeping changes on Friday, ahead of next week’s G20 summit in Seoul, expected to be heated amid currency and trade tensions largely centered on the United States and China.

Proposed by the Group of 20 advanced and emerging-market economies, the package of long-sought reforms aims to better reflect the growing importance of big emerging-market and developing economies in the global economy.

Speaking at the end of talks, IMF managing director Dominique Strauss-Kahn lauded the “historic” deal, which he said created “the biggest ever shift of influence in favor of emerging market and developing countries.”

The IMF board’s calendar cast the meeting under the title “IMF Quota and Governance Reform — Elements of an Agreement.”

Quotas are the contributions of the 187 member states to the fund’s capital. The G20, which represents more than 90 percent of the global economy, has agreed they should be doubled, to 756 billion dollars.

The “governance” reference addresses proposed changes in the balance of power on the 24-director executive board, whose members represent nations or groups of nations and run the day-to-day business of the IMF.

Upon his arrival at the IMF in 2007, Strauss-Kahn made quota redistribution a top priority to resolve a long and bitter fight by emerging-market and developing countries to wrest greater power within the Washington-based institution.

Formed after World War II to remake the world financial system and prevent a return to the 1930s Depression, the IMF has long been dominated by Western powers.

When a previous quota reform plan was officially adopted by member states in April 2008, Strauss-Kahn hailed it as “the beginning of the new legitimacy of the Fund.”

But that reform had not been enacted due to the lack of a sufficient number of ratifications by member states.

Friday’s reforms are designed to close this chapter.

The voting shares of emerging market and developing countries as a group will rise by just over five percentage points, Strauss-Kahn said.

China will move up to the third-largest shareholder, from sixth place.

Europeans have agreed to cede two of their nine seats on the IMF board and all members will be elected, instead of some appointed.

Still, for the reforms to take effect, they will have to be approved by the bank’s governors and go through what could be a long process to obtain legislative ratifications.

The G20 has committed “to work to complete by the annual meetings in 2012″ the reforms, Strauss-Kahn said ahead of Friday’s decision, referring to the IMF and World Bank meetings held in the autumn.

The goal coincides with the scheduled end of Strauss-Kahn’s five-year tenure at the IMF in October that year.

Like Raw Story on Facebook
Agence France-Presse
Agence France-Presse
AFP journalists cover wars, conflicts, politics, science, health, the environment, technology, fashion, entertainment, the offbeat, sports and a whole lot more in text, photographs, video, graphics and online.
 
 
 
 
By commenting, you agree to our terms of service
and to abide by our commenting policy.
 
  • http://topsy.com/www.rawstory.com/rs/2010/11/imf-reforms-double-capital-give-china-india-power/?utm_source=pingback&utm_campaign=L2 Tweets that mention IMF reforms to double capital, give China, India more power | Raw Story — Topsy.com

    [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by The Raw Story, southernmatrix, 93.7 WBLK: T-Boogie, sitfu.com, owen and others. owen said: IMF reforms to double capital, give China, India more power: The International Monetary Fund has decided to doub… http://bit.ly/c3MBZM [...]

  • Anonymous

    … all members will be elected … and who selects those to elect ? I don’t know that the IMF is our friend . Where corporations tell nations what to do , the IMF .

  • http://twitter.com/savagelight ThatBostonMan

    Goddamn IMF.

  • Anonymous

    They can’t make a silk purse out of a sow’s ear.

    The IMF was stop-gap creation at Bretton Woods where the U.S. blew the best chance in its history to create an international bank of banks (a la Keynes’s proposal) to modulate liquidity between all nations whenever needed and at a time when the U.S. would have benefited greatly in the short run and the U.S. and world in the long run. Instead, U.S. ultra conservatives prevailed and we got the IMF. It got away with it until the ’60s and Viet Nam debts, when it inevitably floundered and the rest of the Bretton Woods agreements on currency had to be scrapped by the early ’70s.

    While the U.S. remained dominant, it (more like, U.S. based multi-national finance and corporate interests) could use it to bring developing nations “into line” with “laissez-faire” economic theory and “free trade” that left those developing countries at the mercy of big international corporate money.

    Now we’re trapped in it and the powers that be (a mix of multi-national corps as well as semi- and pseudo-democratic centrally-run states) will fight it out (read find accommodation between them with the general welfare being the lowest priority – or a non-priority to seek its own level as “magic market” thinking sees it). And, SDRs are no substitute for currency coordination – just instruments for continuation of the power politics of the past.

    The next time you read “the world is flat” think “the world is being flattened” for the benefit of only a precious few.

  • http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/GCPX7DXZGK2H2CPNYRR5IS5A64 Turnip Mcgee

    In conjunction with the BIS and World Bank, the IMF is – in layman’s terms, – The Death Star.

    Have you ever have said: “It seems simple, why don’t they just. . . . yadda, yadda .. . . .and fix it “
    The reason why it’s not going to ever be fixed, is because the solution is counter to the interests of these non elected, irresponsible institutions.
    If you want to know why the world is shit, follow the money.
    If you follow the money, no matter what country you are in, or what the politics are, you end up at the IMF, BIS, and the World Bank.
    Poverty and War are their biggest investments, and their constituents have been at if for centuries.

  • http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/L5PHKRPFHK3LLTRDNVH2ZBIWOA Cal

    Big deal. If the IMF hadn’t done it voluntarily, they would have been forced to anyway. The ‘rich’ western countries are bankrupt and will not be a source of new funding in the coming years. Emerging markets have managed to maintain financial viability and so will become important funders for the IMF.

  • http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/L5PHKRPFHK3LLTRDNVH2ZBIWOA Cal

    Well said Turnip. There is a novel solution to the current ‘crisis’ – ordinary shlubs can just opt out and come up with their own financial system. It would hardly make a difference in their lives anyway if they swore off dollars and opted for direct barter or some other form of exchange. The ‘crisis’ exists for those with billions, as their ill gotten riches are in danger of evaporating if the American dollar craters (and takes the rest of the ‘system’ with it). For the majority of ‘middle income’ earners and lower, I cant see how their lives would change for the worse (how could it get worse?). The current financial system (stewarded by the IMF, World Bank, BIS and the like) relies on faith and nothing more. If you decided not to play ball, what could they do – shoot you? Your life would not change, but their lives would be radically altered. You can only be suppressed if you willingly put your neck down so someone can stomp their bootheel on it!

  • http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/GCPX7DXZGK2H2CPNYRR5IS5A64 Turnip Mcgee

    Tanks :]
    I’ve been looking at professional barter systems, but it seems we are out of practice. Also, we are still legally liable for taxes on the arms length value of the barter, which needs to be remitted in FRN’s, so that necessitates some dollars.
    What makes more sense, and what I find fascinating, is local independent and parallel currencies, like Berkshares, and Ithaca Hours. We’d know that all of those units of exchange would be kept local, and would not be ending up at Government Sachs, or as a CEO”s bonus.

  • http://www.windycitizen.com/bartekdamek Pozycjonowanie

    a lot of thanks for sharing these instructive

>