Report typos and corrections to: corrections@rawstory.com.
Stories Chosen For You
Trump-backing Michigan lawmaker 'entangled in a probe into unauthorized access to voting tabulators': report
May 20, 2022
On Friday, The Detroit News reported that Daire Rendon, a pro-Trump Michigan state representative, has been caught up in an investigation into illegal access to voting equipment.
"The Michigan State Police and Attorney General Dana Nessel's office have been investigating voting machine access in multiple counties in the battleground state for months. Their work started in Roscommon County, an area represented by Rendon, a Republican from Lake City," said the report.
Carol Asher, the longtime clerk in Denton Township, told The Detroit News that Rendon "wanted to get access to our tabulator, and I said no."
Asher added that Rendon had called other clerks and had made the same request.
READ MORE: New Eastman revelations 'directly tie Donald Trump to an arguable fraud': legal expert
"The Attorney General's Office reached out to Asher... and she provided a statement about Rendon's request on March 10, 2022," The Detroit News notes. "The subject line of the statement was 'statement regarding phone call received about tabulator access,'" the report continued. "In a Thursday interview, Rendon, a third-term lawmaker, declined to answer whether she had been interviewed by the Michigan State Police as part of the tabulator probe."
This comes as other pro-Trump officials have faced investigations and criminal charges for unauthorized access to voting equipment.
In Colorado, two county clerks, Tina Peters and Dallas Schroeder, have been accused of improperly breaching voting machines to try to gather evidence for the former president's conspiracy theory that the 2020 election was stolen. Peters has been indicted on 10 counts relating to the incident.
CONTINUE READING
Show less
Reacting to a report from Politico that so-called "coup memo" attorney John Eastman reportedly has handwritten notes from former president Donald Trump on strategies for overturning the 2020 presidential election, CNN's Elie Hoenig suggested they could be the smoking gun to charge trump with fraud or worse.
On Friday, Politico reported Eastman is battling with the courts over more documents by claiming attorney-client privilege that reportedly show Trump took a direct role in efforts to derail the certification of the election that he lost to President Joe Biden.
The report describes “two hand-written notes from former President Trump about information that he thought might be useful for the anticipated litigation," which Eastman wants to keep from the eyes of the Jan. 6 committee investigating the insurrection.
Speaking with CNN's Jim Sciutto, former federal prosecutor Hoenig predicted Eastman would fail in his efforts, explaining, it "is very unlikely Donald Trump is going to win and John Eastman is going to win in this case because John Eastman already has lost earlier in this case in front of the same judge. You'll probably remember a couple of months ago John Eastman argued some documents shouldn't go over to the committee because they are communications between me as an attorney and my client Donald Trump. The court rejected that. Some of the documents, some of them, the court found they're not privileged because it is more likely than not that they go to a criminal communication between John Eastman and Donald Trump."
IN OTHER NEWS: The potential for political violence lies with normal people harboring extreme racist attitudes
Pressed by the host about the new report and why it is so important, Hoenig stated, "What's significant about these new revelations, Jim, they directly tie Donald Trump to an arguable fraud -- maybe more than arguable fraud. Now let's keep this in mind, this puts Donald Trump right in line with John Eastman on the strategy to try to steal the election by pressuring state legislatures, the vice president."
"That legal argument is dubious at best, but the defense is going to be, well, lawyers are allowed to make aggressive, novel, even sometimes just bad legal arguments, that's not necessarily a fraud," he continued before elaborating, "But the fraud is a layer below, because those arguments were built on a foundation of lies that Donald Trump had won the election. that there was massive election fraud. There is no evidence of that, there never was, that's where I think the actual fraud could come in here."
Watch below or at this link.
CNN 05 20 2022 09 16 48 youtu.be
CONTINUE READING
Show less
The potential for political violence lies with normal people harboring extreme racist attitudes
May 20, 2022
On May 15, a young white man carrying a semi-automatic rifle opened fire outside a supermarket in a predominantly Black eastside neighborhood of Buffalo. The rifle barrel had the N-word written on it along with the number 14, a well-known white supremacist slogan.
Payton Gendron killed three outside the grocery store and wounded another. Then he went inside. When it was over, 10 people were dead, including a security guard with whom he had exchanged fire. Of the 13 people shot, 11 were Black. Gendron, clad in body armor, live-streamed the shooting on Twitch. (Twitch has since deleted the video).
Gendron, 18, is from a rural town 200 miles from Buffalo. There he assembled and posted online a 180-page manifesto. According to CNN, he wrote about “his perceptions of the dwindling size of the White population and claims of ethnic and cultural replacement of Whites,” and “attributes the internet for most of his beliefs and describes himself as a fascist, a White supremacist and an anti-Semite.”
Mass shooting equation
The public discourse around these tragedies follows a predictable pattern. News reports and commentary discuss how extremism was cultivated in online spaces. Once down the extremism rabbit hole, they took advantage of lax or questionable gun laws to arm themselves. They methodically identified a location where the target would be congregating, and then decided to execute as many as they could.
This is the extremism + guns = mass shooting equation.
It is correct.
To a degree.
The set of beliefs up to and including the belief that terrorism is an appropriate plan of action is clearly extreme. There is a spectrum of racist practices. Gendron was on the far end of that. No doubt.
He’s an extremist.
There is no doubt that readily available firearms are a powerful means by which extremists terrorize minority populations.
If they live in a state with no waiting period for gun purchases, the ink on the manifesto may not have dried by the time they commit mass murder. The potential for carnage, moreover, is exponentially greater if the extremist uses a rapid-fire weapon, like a semi-automatic rifle.
Clearly, the extremism + guns = mass shooting equation is right.
But we’re missing the forest for the trees.
Extreme normal people
The trees are deciphering a shooter’s manifesto. The trees are the patchwork of gun sale and ownership laws and their loopholes in the US. The trees are the quality of the numerous research papers dedicated to understanding how someone becomes radicalized online.
But we need to zoom out for the forest.
If we could look down on the American population from 30,000 feet, we would see large swaths of everyday white Americans grappling with changes in their status vis-a-vis Black people and people of color:
Racial minorities, especially Black Americans, have been pushing for more visibility in the media and more representation in institutions.
The behaviors of people of color, again especially Black Americans, have always been under scrutiny. Increasingly, the behaviors of white Americans are being scrutinized.
For the first time, possibly, since the Great Depression, white Americans are experiencing economic distress, like Black people.
These very real trends amount to a loss of privilege and status. Gone are the days when being white was the most fungible currency. White Americans are more than ever on equal terms with people of color.
This should be celebrated.
But for many white Americans, it generates deep feelings of precarity – a sense that they must do something before all is lost.
With that precarity, and sense of loss, we get a series of problematic behaviors. It would be unwise to assume those behaviors are only random acts of violence. Instead, it’s a collection of opinions and behaviors amounting to a culture of normal people who are extreme.
They are, as Jonathan Metzl argues, literally “dying of whiteness.”
They refuse to support universal health care even though they need it because they see it as a benefit to Black people and people of color.
They support deportation, voter suppression and book burning.
They fill the ranks of the Oathkeepers and other citizen-militia groups.
They are election deniers so devoted they became J6 insurrectionists.
They go to school board meetings and howl at educators to keep “CRT” out of classrooms even if there is no such thing being taught.
They vote for candidates who have no legislative or political experience but pander to their identity as aggrieved white people.
I could go on.
These are accountants, Uber drivers, custodians, lawyers and software engineers. They are normal people with extreme racist attitudes.
So even if we were able to repeal the Second Amendment and find a way to erase all the conspiracy theories and hate speech from the internet, they would find ways of acting out their racist aggression.
Is it really surprising that out of the millions of people in this culture, a Payton Gendron would eventually wake up one morning, write the N-word on the barrel of his rifle and kill 10 Black people with it?
CONTINUE READING
Show less
Copyright © 2022 Raw Story Media, Inc. PO Box 21050, Washington, D.C. 20009 | Masthead | Privacy Policy | For corrections or concerns, please email corrections@rawstory.com.
{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}