Tired of ads? Want to support our progressive journalism? Click to learn more.LEARN MORE
Enjoy good journalism?
… then let us make a small request. The COVID crisis has slashed advertising rates, and we need your help. Like you, we here at Raw Story believe in the power of progressive journalism. Raw Story readers power David Cay Johnston’s DCReport, which we've expanded to keep watch in Washington. We’ve exposed billionaire tax evasion and uncovered White House efforts to poison our water. We’ve revealed financial scams that prey on veterans, and legal efforts to harm workers exploited by abusive bosses. And unlike other news outlets, we’ve decided to make our original content free. But we need your support to do what we do.
Raw Story is independent. Unhinged from corporate overlords, we fight to ensure no one is forgotten.
We need your support in this difficult time. Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Invest with us. Make a one-time contribution to Raw Story Investigates, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click to donate by check.
Value Raw Story?
… then let us make a small request. The COVID crisis has slashed advertising rates, and we need your help. Like you, we believe in the power of progressive journalism — and we’re investing in investigative reporting as other publications give it the ax. Raw Story readers power David Cay Johnston’s DCReport, which we've expanded to keep watch in Washington. We’ve exposed billionaire tax evasion and uncovered White House efforts to poison our water. We’ve revealed financial scams that prey on veterans, and efforts to harm workers exploited by abusive bosses. We need your support to do what we do.
Raw Story is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Invest with us in the future. Make a one-time contribution to Raw Story Investigates, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you.
Report typos and corrections to: corrections@rawstory.com.
Tom Cotton's 'Army Ranger' lies go back at least eight years
January 26, 2021
Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., has over the years routinely puffed up his political bona fides by embellishing his military service record, claiming in multiple interviews and campaign ads not only to have been a U.S. Army Ranger, but to have served in action as a Ranger — and, at one point, to have earned the Bronze Star "as a Ranger."
Salon reported on Friday that during Cotton's first congressional campaign, the Harvard Law grad claimed to have served as a Ranger and acquired "experience" as a Ranger in combat zones in Iraq and Afghanistan. A number of people came to the senator's defense, observing that as a graduate of the U.S. Army Ranger School, Cotton — who once said that "bombing makes us safer" — is within his rights to lay colloquial claim to the title. Salon's original article has been upheld as correct by the fact-check site Snopes, but even those who believe it's acceptable for Cotton to call himself a Ranger, as opposed to the more accurate "Ranger-qualified," would likely agree that he can't claim battlefield experience as a Ranger, nor that he served as one. Yet the Arkansas senator appears to have done both, on more than one occasion.
<p>Cotton still has not provided comment to Salon, but he addressed the issue directly in an <a href="https://video.foxnews.com/v/6226083907001#sp=show-clips" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">interview</a> with Fox News' Bret Baier on Monday.</p><p>"Were you straightforward with voters about your military service?" Baier asked.</p><p>"Yeah thanks, Brett. I graduated from Ranger School and wore the Ranger tab in combat with the 101st Airborne in Iraq. This is not about my military record; this is about my politics," Cotton replied. "Ranger Regiment legends like Gen. Scotty Miller or Gen. Craig Nixon have used the term to describe both alumni of the Ranger Regiment and graduates of the Ranger School, as did the secretary of the Army. As did most of my buddies in the Army. As did most of the liberal media, until a conservative veteran was using the term that way. But if some people disagree, that's fine; I respect their views. What's most important, I respect the service of all Rangers and indeed all soldiers who serve our country."</p><p>That resembles a coherent answer. But Cotton has in fact suggested that he served with those Rangers. A 2014 <a href="https://twitter.com/Biden_Army/status/1353120438835171328" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">campaign ad</a> from his first Senate run, for instance, features Cotton telling the viewing audience that he "made tough decisions as an Army Ranger in Iraq." Perhaps most egregiously, a <a href="https://soundcloud.com/cotton-for-congress/lets-take-our-country-back" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">2012 congressional campaign ad</a> approved and paid for by Cotton even claims that "as a Ranger, Tom Cotton earned the Bronze Star."</p><p>It is unclear why Cotton, who is thought to be <a href="https://apnews.com/article/election-2020-donald-trump-virus-outbreak-arkansas-senate-elections-9238d8b14ee04d9b61490acd60125f8a" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">laying the brickwork for a 2024 presidential bid</a>, has so routinely linked his military service to his Ranger School graduation, but his name and the title have over time <a href="https://twitter.com/backwards_river/status/1353164163942649856" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">become linked</a> in media <a href="https://twitter.com/backwards_river/status/1353165378776666114" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">reports</a>.</p><p>To be clear, passing Ranger School, a grueling 62-day course open to any member of the military, is considered a top honor for any soldier, but it is not the same thing as passing the Army's Ranger Assessment and Selection Program (RASP), which produces the elite troops who deploy as Rangers, in their distinctive tan berets and special ops badges. The question of whether any Ranger School graduate is a Ranger by definition is a matter of semantic debate in the military, and far from settled, as pointed out in a <a href="https://www.military.com/daily-news/2021/01/24/you-shouldnt-be-calling-yourself-ranger-tom-cottons-military-service-under-scrutiny-fellow-army-vet.html" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Military.com</a> article about the reaction to Salon's reporting: "While the distinction is rarely brought up outside of military circles, it has been fiercely debated among veterans and encapsulates the nuances of military titles." A Pentagon official not authorized to speak on the record told Salon in a call over the weekend that, according to the Army, Cotton is technically "Ranger-qualified," and not "a Ranger." (The Army and its Special Operations unit have not answered Salon's multiple requests for comment.)</p><p>Two Republican Ranger School grads sparred over the issue in last year's New Hampshire's GOP Senate primary. Colorado lawyer Bryant "Corky" Messner claimed he "served as a Ranger," but his opponent, retired Brig. Gen. Don Bolduc, disagreed.</p><p>"Unless you served in a Ranger battalion, I think you're overstretching your claim," Bolduc told Messner last spring, <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/07/22/gop-senate-hopeful-says-hes-an-army-ranger-army-says-hes-ranger-qualified/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">reported</a> Washington Post fact-checker Glenn Kessler. "I'm Ranger-qualified, and I always stipulate that. I never served in a Ranger battalion." Kessler, after several conversations with Army officials, rated it a two-Pinocchio lie on Messner's part.</p><p>But with Cotton, a war hawk who has been deemed a "maniac" even by the conservative <a href="https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/tom-cotton-is-a-maniac" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Washington Examiner</a>, the issue goes deeper: Cotton hasn't simply said that he was a Ranger, but has strongly suggested or implied that he had deployed, even fought, as a Ranger.</p><p>After Salon's original article was published, conservative radio host Hugh Hewitt came to Cotton's defense on Twitter, <a href="https://twitter.com/hughhewitt/status/1353082599443292161" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">calling</a> the piece a "scurrilous attack."</p><p>"I've interviewed @SenTomCotton almost weekly for 8 years," Hewitt wrote. "He's rightly proud of his service w/ 101st in Baghdad and w/ The Old Guard and of his Ranger Tab for Ranger School but never confused units or his service. Never claimed to have served in a Ranger unit. Scurrilous attack."</p><p>In fact, in one of those <a href="https://hughhewitt.com/republican-congressmen-suicide-bombers/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">interviews</a>, conducted in 2013, Cotton leads Hewitt to believe that he had actually fought while deployed as a Ranger.</p><p>After Cotton explains that he had enlisted as an infantry officer and "became an Army Ranger," Hewitt inquires about his combat experience as a Ranger, asking: "And so as a Ranger and in Iraq, and in Afghanistan, were you ever attacked by suicide bombers?"</p><p>Cotton answers directly, without distinction: "My patrols personally were not, Hugh, thankfully for my men and for me."</p><p>The show's title refers to Cotton as "Former Army Ranger."</p><p>During a live interview in 2019 for CSPAN's BookTV series, the Arkansas senator <a href="https://www.c-span.org/video/?460912-1/senator-tom-cotton-discusses-arlington-national-cemetery-regiment-history" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">told</a> Hewitt a story about a soldier who had the integrity to report himself for a violation, even though he could have gotten away with it. He then does not correct Hewitt when the latter refers to Cotton's Ranger claim.</p><p>"Now you, Senator, are a Ranger, and 'Rangers lead the way' is the motto," Hewitt says, asking about the transition to a non-combat role after he "came out of the surge leading a platoon in Baghdad."</p><p>Cotton quips: "Well, you know, people weren't trying to kill me anymore. That was the biggest difference."</p><p>Complaints about Cotton's use of the term, in fact, have circulated locally as early as his first congressional campaign <a href="http://waronterrornews.typepad.com/home/2012/01/cpt-tom-cotton-for-arkansas-4th-district.html" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">in 2012</a>.</p><p>In response to Salon's report on Friday, Rep. Jason Crow, D-Wis., who served in the Ranger battalion, tweeted, "Hey @SenTomCotton, unless you wore one of these berets you shouldn't be calling yourself a Ranger. Truth matters."</p><p>Cotton has not offered a response to Salon, but after the publication of Salon's original article, the senator's communications team sent the Washington Free Beacon, a conservative site, its email exchange with Salon for an article about Salon's purported collaboration with an outside researcher.</p><p>The Free Beacon, it turns out, has deep ties to Cotton, dating to his relationship with leading conservative (and now Never Trumper) Bill Kristol, who helped elevate Cotton to the Senate. Cotton hired Kristol's son, Joseph, as his legislative director, and Kristol's son-in-law is the Free Beacon's founding editor. One of Cotton's foreign policy advisers and legislative directors, Aaron MacLean, was formerly managing editor at the Free Beacon.</p><p>From <a href="https://www.thenation.com/article/politics/tom-cotton-trump-2-0/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">The Nation</a>:</p> <blockquote> The Washington Free Beacon — whose founding editor is Matthew Continetti, Kristol's son-in-law — highlights Cotton's exploits so regularly that any given page of its Tom Cotton archives (say, <a href="https://freebeacon.com/tag/tom-cotton/page/2/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">this year's July-September page</a>) will feature an array of headlines that speak to the vast range of the senator's expertise.<br/> </blockquote> <p>The Beacon's writer on the piece about Salon was formerly a paid Republican operative, and was named a Beacon "man of the year" for his work helping defeat Democratic Sen. Claire McCaskill of Missouri in <a href="https://freebeacon.com/men-of-the-year/2018-man-of-the-year-air-claire-traffic-control-guy/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">2018</a>. Another man of the year for 2018? <a href="https://freebeacon.com/men-of-the-year/2018-man-year-tom-cotton/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Tom Cotton</a>, for advocating against prison reform. </p>
CONTINUE READING
Show less
Sarah Sanders' lies were worse than originally reported — here's how she got away with them
January 26, 2021
In her tenure as White House Press Secretary, Sarah Huckabee Sanders became legendary for her ability to lie at the podium.
But according to conservative commentator Andrew Egger, writing for The Bulwark, Sanders' real "success" for the Trump administration did not come from how frequently she lied — it came from the fact that most of her lies were boring.
<p><em>This story first ran in June, 2019.</em></p><p>"Her morose, plodding style and Bartlebyesque refusals to grant reporters a single inch of ground poured cold water on news cycle after news cycle that might otherwise have ignited," wrote Egger. "The downside, of course, was that she lied a lot. But even here she distinguished herself from [predecessor Sean] Spicer, whose sweaty, frantic tall tales—<em>that was the largest audience to ever witness an inauguration, period!</em>—always invited heaps of instant ridicule. Deadpanning her way through boring, misleading briefing after boring, misleading briefing, Sarah Sanders managed to take most of the fun out of calling her out—as much of a victory as Trump could typically hope for, under the circumstances."</p><p>There were certainly some falsehoods so egregious that they did catch the media's attention. The time that she lied that "countless" FBI agents told her they had lost confidence in former Director James Comey, for example, which she herself <a href="https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2019/04/sarah-sanders-mueller-report" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">admitted</a> to former special counsel Robert Mueller was a lie. And her claim that CNN reporter Jim Acosta had attacked a White House intern, which was the pretext for revoking his press credentials and which she tried to back up with <a href="https://www.thedailybeast.com/acosta-video-tweeted-out-by-sarah-huckabee-sanders-doctored-expert" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">doctored video footage</a>.</p><p>But these lies were the exception rather than the rule, said Egger. Most of her ignoble talent lay in her ability to simply deny things, over and over, relentlessly, until reporters just gave up. This has been the norm on everything from reporters asking her questions about the Mueller investigation, to the times the president has glorified the idea of violence against journalists.</p><p>"It wasn't any single heroic act of staggering duplicity that earned Sarah Sanders her paycheck at the White House," concluded Egger. "It was the mealy spaces between the highlights: the constant barrage of bald denials of plain fact, all delivered in a bored monotone that made them seem not outrageous, or even particularly notable, but simply tiresome. How will they manage to replace that?"</p>
CONTINUE READING
Show less
Trending
Latest
Videos
Copyright © 2021 Raw Story Media, Inc. PO Box 21050, Washington, D.C. 20009 | Masthead | Privacy Policy | For corrections or concerns, please email corrections@rawstory.com.