Enjoy good journalism?
… then let us make a small request. The COVID crisis has slashed advertising rates, and we need your help. Like you, we here at Raw Story believe in the power of progressive journalism. Raw Story readers power David Cay Johnston’s DCReport, which we've expanded to keep watch in Washington. We’ve exposed billionaire tax evasion and uncovered White House efforts to poison our water. We’ve revealed financial scams that prey on veterans, and legal efforts to harm workers exploited by abusive bosses. And unlike other news outlets, we’ve decided to make our original content free. But we need your support to do what we do.
Raw Story is independent. Unhinged from corporate overlords, we fight to ensure no one is forgotten.
We need your support in this difficult time. Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Invest with us. Make a one-time contribution to Raw Story Investigates, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click to donate by check.
Value Raw Story?
… then let us make a small request. The COVID crisis has slashed advertising rates, and we need your help. Like you, we believe in the power of progressive journalism — and we’re investing in investigative reporting as other publications give it the ax. Raw Story readers power David Cay Johnston’s DCReport, which we've expanded to keep watch in Washington. We’ve exposed billionaire tax evasion and uncovered White House efforts to poison our water. We’ve revealed financial scams that prey on veterans, and efforts to harm workers exploited by abusive bosses. We need your support to do what we do.
Raw Story is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Invest with us in the future. Make a one-time contribution to Raw Story Investigates, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you.
Shooting of Black man in his own apartment provides a startling glimpse of what police impunity looks like
ProPublica is a Pulitzer Prize-winning investigative newsroom. Sign up for The Big Story newsletter to receive stories like this one in your inbox.
Whatever the jury ultimately decides about the culpability of former Minneapolis officer Derek Chauvin in the death of George Floyd, we already know the case is an anomaly. Officers who kill civilians are rarely prosecuted, let alone convicted — many aren't even disciplined by their departments.
To understand how police impunity works, it's worth looking at another case, that of Kawaski Trawick.
Two years ago, Trawick was alone in his apartment in the Bronx when two New York City Police Department officers arrived in response to 911 calls about Trawick walking through the building with a serrated bread knife and a stick. Trawick, who had a history of mental health and drug issues, had locked himself out of his apartment but had gotten back in after firefighters pried open the door. When the police officers arrived minutes later, they pushed the door ajar and found Trawick, a personal trainer and dancer, standing near his stove, holding the knife and stick.
“Why are you in my home?" Trawick asked. Less than two minutes later, he lay dying on the floor. A few months ago, I examined what happened in those 112 seconds. Video from a body-worn camera shows one of the officers — Black and more experienced — repeatedly trying to stop his white, less experienced partner from using force.
“We ain't gonna tase him," Officer Herbert Davis told Officer Brendan Thompson, as Trawick stood about seven feet from them. Thompson fired his Taser anyway, which (as can happen) enraged Trawick, who ran toward the officers. Davis again tried to stop his partner, this time from shooting his gun. He briefly pushed Thompson's gun down, saying, “No, no — don't, don't, don't, don't, don't."
Thompson fired three times, paused for a moment, and then fired a final shot. Trawick died almost instantly. You can see and hear it all for yourself, in a video we made using surveillance and body-worn camera footage. (Davis and Thompson both declined requests for comment.)
Last Wednesday marked two years since the shooting, so I checked in with the NYPD about it. The department had said late last year that it had finally finished its internal investigation and that the police commissioner — who has complete discretion over discipline, as many chiefs around the country do — would soon be deciding what to do.
Last week, the NYPD told me that Commissioner Dermot Shea had indeed ruled on the case. The officers were completely cleared. “There was no discipline as no wrongdoing was found," the department said.
Here is the NYPD's full statement. It noted that there was also a “tactical review" to determine “what, if anything, could have been done differently."
Experts I spoke with pointed to a litany of poor decisions and tactics by the officers.
The officers could have tried to make a connection with Trawick, as the NYPD trains its officers to do, and at least answered his repeated questions about why they were there. They could have waited for help and “just closed the door," as one former NYPD detective told me, since department policy is to “isolate and contain" people in crisis. They could have decided to not use force, as other officers did when they had encountered Trawick in a similar situation weeks before.
Thompson could have warned Trawick before firing his Taser, as the NYPD encourages officers to do so. After he used his Taser, Thompson could have kept it in his hand, rather than putting it on the ground and leaving himself with only his gun.
Yet as perplexing as the NYPD's conclusion may seem, it is also the logical culmination of a series of decisions that have again and again narrowed the avenues for accountability.
The rare occasions in which officers have faced even the possibility of significant punishment have usually come after the public has seen what happened, for example, after a bystander filmed Chauvin's knee on Floyd's neck. Trawick's killing happened out of the public eye. And the NYPD worked to keep it that way.
For a year and a half, it refused to release body-worn camera footage, arguing in response to a public records request and lawsuit that doing so would “interfere" with the department's internal investigation and would be an “unwarranted invasion of personal privacy."
But the NYPD did offer its perspective about what happened. “It appears to be justified," one of the NYPD's top officials told reporters the day after the shooting.
The police's perspective shaped the early coverage. Citing “law enforcement sources," the New York Post reported that a “musclebound man" who was “nicknamed 'Chaos'" had been shot “when he charged at cops twice with a stick and a knife." (Trawick was about 5 feet, 5 inches tall, and his family told me they've never heard that nickname. The video shows he ran at the officers once, after he was hit by a Taser.)
The NYPD eventually decided to release footage, after the Bronx District Attorney's Office published it as part of a report last November that laid out its decision not to pursue criminal charges against the officers. The DA's decision, too, was no surprise: Local prosecutors, who work closely with the police, are particularly hesitant to indict officers.
The DA's report had troubling revelations buried inside it. While the report's highlighted timeline didn't mention it, the report revealed more than two dozen pages in that Davis had tried to stop his partner from shooting Trawick. It also disclosed that other officers had previously decided there was no need to use force when they answered remarkably similar calls involving Trawick. On page 36, the report cited those interactions as “examples of disparate outcomes that deserve mention."
The DA's report did not contain the full, unedited body-worn camera footage, and the NYPD initially continued to fight a lawsuit demanding it.
The day before a December hearing in the case, the NYPD sent the footage to the complainants, New York Lawyers for the Public Interest, because, after 20 months, the department's internal review was complete. That footage, which the law firm shared with me, showed that as officers converged on the scene where Trawick lay lifeless, two of them told a sergeant that “nobody" had been hurt. “Just a perp."
Shortly after ProPublica published a story about that, a lawyer working on the case for New York Lawyers for the Public Interest got a phone call from the city agency that investigates police misconduct against civilians. An investigator at the Civilian Complaint Review Board had a favor to ask: Could the lawyer please share the newly released footage with him? The investigator explained that the NYPD wouldn't provide footage to the CCRB.
“I was shocked to get that call," said the lawyer, Benjamin Reed, of Milbank LLP. “It's disturbing that they had to come to us, after we had to fight with the NYPD for a year to get it. It's just backwards. It's obvious that they can't properly oversee the NYPD if they can't get footage."
That is part of a long pattern of the NYPD obstructingthe work of the overmatched agencies that are supposed to oversee it. In shootings and other serious incidents such as the Trawick case, the NYPD routinely refuses to give the CCRB footage and other records until the department's internal investigation is over, which can take a year or more.
The delays can render the civilian board's investigations effectively moot. The CCRB told me that its investigation into Trawick's killing is still open, and that it has now received footage from the NYPD. But the police commissioner, who gets final say on punishment, has already decided there was no wrongdoing.
When I reported on the Trawick case last fall, one of the people I spoke with was Jonathan Smith, who worked on civil rights litigation at the Justice Department during the Obama administration and led the agency's most significant investigations into police abuse. “This case is a lesson in how you don't do one of these encounters," he said, after reviewing the footage. “They should teach it in the academy."
I reached back out to Smith to share the NYPD's conclusion that there was no wrongdoing. “For them to find nothing wrong there," he said, “it's just stunning."
Smith said it reminded him of another young man's death he recently investigated for the city of Aurora, Colorado. Twenty-three-year-old Elijah McClain died after police officers twice put him in a chokehold and paramedics injected him with ketamine. The officers had stopped him after a 911 caller said McClain, who was walking down the street, “looked sketchy."
Like Trawick, McClain wasn't doing anything criminal. As in the Trawick case, local prosecutors decided not to indict the officers. And as in the Trawick case, an internal police investigation cleared the officers. (The independent review that Smith led concluded that the investigation had been “cursory and summary at best.")
It's all part of a pattern, Smith said: “Every department I've seen where there's been a pattern of misconduct, you've also had a broken accountability system."
There was one other call I made after learning of the NYPD's decision. It was to Kawaski Trawick's mother, Ellen Trawick. She had not heard about the department's ruling.
“I just don't understand it," she said. “He hadn't committed a crime. He hadn't harmed anyone. They came into his own home and took his life for no reason. For them not to see that's wrong, that's just heartbreaking."
Trawick and her family have filed a lawsuit against the city, the NYPD and the officers.
But a suit can only do so much. If there's a settlement or a judgment, it's likely the city and its taxpayers, not the officers or the NYPD, that will pay.
In response to the family's action, city lawyers have placed the blame for Kawaski Trawick's death squarely on Kawaski Trawick. As they put it in a filing last fall: “Plaintiff(s)' culpable conduct caused or contributed, in whole or in part, to his/her/their injuries and or damages."
I asked Ellen Trawick what outcome she is hoping for in the suit. “I want the officers held accountable for their actions," she said. “They took Kawaski's life. But from what you're saying there's nothing going to be done about it."
Republican Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) is set on forcing a vote in the House on his resolution to censure Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA). There's little chance it will pass, and Democrats might be able to block it before he's able to force a vote, but regardless it very easily could backfire against them, according to Politico.
Republicans in the House and Senate are claiming to be furious after Waters went to Minnesota to talk with Black Lives Matter protestors and told them if former police officer Derek Chauvin is not found guilty of killing George Floyd they must "stay on the street" and become "more confrontational."
Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene is falsely claiming Waters is inciting violence, and she's moving the expel the California Democrat, which also will not happen.
Others, like House Republican Minority Whip Steve Scalise, on Tuesday falsely claimed Waters was "trying to incite violence and, in fact, there is violence going on right now in Minnesota because of her actions."
Republicans are trying to inflate Waters' comments and use them against Democrats. The National Republican Congressional Committee "is already planning to use this vote to tie moderate Democrats to Waters, according to spokesman Michael Mcadams," Politico reports.
Politico says if Republicans go ahead with this plan it "could also trigger Democratic action as well."
Many House Democrats are still furious about the January 6 insurrection, and that they're forced to work "alongside apologists to an insurrection."
"Tensions remain high in the House after Jan. 6, with Democrats privately lamenting that they're working alongside apologists to an insurrection. Democratic leadership has privately worked to persuade many of these frustrated members to hold back on forcing votes rebuking their GOP colleagues to try to lower the temperature in Washington. They may be less restrained after the GOP-led vote on Waters."
Democrats could force action against some of the extremists, or resuscitate what had appeared to be an all-but-dead January 6 House Commission, something Speaker Pelosi just brought up again, as did a New York Times editorial board member.
'Insurrectionist traitor' Ted Cruz blasted with fury for claiming Democrats encourage political violence
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) was blasted with fury for suggesting that Democrats provoked political violence.
The Texas Republican accused Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA) of encouraging riots in Minneapolis, where jurors are deliberating murder charges against former police officer Derek Chauvin in the killing of George Floyd, and other social media users reminded Cruz that he helped incite the Jan. 6 insurrection by objecting the certification of Joe Biden's election win.
Other Twitter users didn't want to hear from Cruz on that topic.
@SenTedCruz https://t.co/m1CO6CdftY— Grudgie the Whale (@Grudgie the Whale)1618935720.0
@SenTedCruz The country knows which party has chosen violence and which party chooses to march for the rights of th… https://t.co/7bXwmKN67g— ☮ 🇸🇲🇮🇹🇹🇾 (@☮ 🇸🇲🇮🇹🇹🇾)1618931957.0
@arthursimonart @SenTedCruz When is he going to be held accountable?— Laura Gelezunas 🇱🇹 (@Laura Gelezunas 🇱🇹)1618935177.0
@SenTedCruz You still talking, seditionist traitor?— Dennis Perkins (@Dennis Perkins)1618934949.0
@SenTedCruz It's really strange how you're not showing the part where she explained that the confrontation she's ta… https://t.co/qDs4TTZmgI— KevinlyFather 🇺🇲🇨🇦🇲🇼🇸🇿 (@KevinlyFather 🇺🇲🇨🇦🇲🇼🇸🇿)1618932808.0
@SenTedCruz So says the one of the men who helped prep the crowd for a violent storming of the capitol building to… https://t.co/2NFBUJ9yF8— Leaping Lizard (@Leaping Lizard)1618932395.0
@SenTedCruz Remind us Ted where you were and what you were saying on 1/6/21. Ted Cruz doesn't live in reality, and… https://t.co/qCik1EuezR— DowntroddenInDC (@DowntroddenInDC)1618932851.0
@SenTedCruz 1/6 will be your scourge forever, no matter how much you try to distract from your complicity.— TXLyn13 (@TXLyn13)1618932120.0
Don't Sit on the Sidelines of History. Join Raw Story Investigates and Go Ad-Free. Support Honest Journalism.
$95 / year — Just $7.91/month
I want to Support More
$14.99 per month