Report typos and corrections to: corrections@rawstory.com.
Like this article ? Text `Support` to 50123 to donate.
Right-wing victimhood hits a new level of absurdity in response to Biden's promise of a Black woman on the Supreme Court
January 27, 2022
Justice Stephen Breyer's upcoming retirement from the Supreme Court was reported late Wednesday morning, and by Wednesday night, Fox News and other right-wing outlets already had their narrative: President Joe Biden's new nominee is proof that a white man can't catch a break in the U.S. of A.
Mind you, there is no nominee yet, though potential shortlists have been floated. On the campaign trail, Biden promised to nominate a Black woman for the court, a promise he reiterated from the White House on Thursday. "I've made no decision except one, the person I will nominate will be someone of extraordinary qualifications, character and experience and that person will be the first black woman ever nominated to the United States Supreme Court."
Of the 115 justices that have sat on the Supreme Court, 0 have been Black women, but 107 of them have been white men. Nonetheless, GOP media swiftly circled around the claim that this nominee — whoever they may be — is proof that white men are the real victims of discrimination. One of those white men confirmed to the court — Justice Brett Kavanaugh — now is one of the most powerful people in the country. Still, he was held out as even further proof that white men are the most victimized of all victims.
RELATED: Republicans know Brett Kavanaugh lied under oath: They just don't care
"Biden didn't mention the Supreme Court nominee's legal qualifications or judicial philosophy or ability to perform one of the most important jobs in the country. He didn't even tell us she was a nice person. All he said was she's going to be Black and she's going to be female, because to him, that's all that matters," Fox News host Tucker Carlson screeched in one of his typical fascistic rants Wednesday night. He sneeringly suggested George Floyd's sister, Bridget Floyd, is the "obvious choice," because even though she "is not a judge or a lawyer or whatever," Biden supposedly doesn't care about "this law stuff."
The obvious implication of Carlson's rant is there is no such thing as a Black woman who is qualified for this role. This is, unsurprisingly, an easily disproved insinuation. The top name floated from Biden's likely shortlist is Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, who sits on the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals — the same court that Kavanaugh was nominated from by Donald Trump and now Attorney General Merrick Garland was nominated for the Supreme Court from by Barack Obama. The other reported top name is California Supreme Court Justice Leondra Kruger. Both of these women, one a Harvard law and one a Yale law graduate, are very much into "this law stuff."
Carlson's rhetoric is hyperbolic, but the more "respectable" right-wing press is playing the same game of trying to disqualify Black women and painting Biden's promise as discrimination against supposedly more qualified white men.
Want more Amanda Marcotte on politics? Subscribe to her newsletter Standing Room Only.
Ed Whelan of the National Review wrote a piece earlier this month claiming "black women are massively overrepresented among Biden's appellate picks" and that "the big losers (I take some delight in noting) are liberal white males." The New York Times then uncritically echoed Whelan's point:
According to a 2021 profile of the legal profession by the American Bar Association, just 4.7 percent of American lawyers are Black and 37 percent of lawyers are female. The report did not break out Black women in particular, but the implication is that roughly 2 percent of American lawyers are both Black and female.
Never mind, of course, that only eight Black women had served on federal appeals courts prior to Biden taking office — and none before 1975. Black women are nearly 7% of the population and continue to be 0% of the Supreme Court, as has been true literally throughout its history.
RELATED: Tucker Carlson's insecurity and the "great replacement" theory
Nevertheless, the idea that white men are being shoved aside so Black women can steal "their" jobs was the theme that carried the day in Republican reactions.
Carrie Severino of the Judicial Crisis Network tweeted that "The Left bullied Justice Breyer into retirement" and Tom Fitton of Judicial Watch echoed the talking point with the claim that "The Left forced Breyer off the Supreme Court." On Fox News, Sean Hannity whined that it was "gender discrimination" for Biden to try to rectify the wild imbalance towards men with a female nominee. Carlson's lengthy tantrum included complaints about the "casual racism of affirmative action" and that "Joe Biden's nominees look nothing like America, not even close."
The bellyaching about the alleged victimization of white men was also the theme of Greg Gutfeld's conniption on Fox News. "Whoever gets nominated, I'm going to say that that person -- be they male or female, or nonbinary -- did something really bad to me," he "joked" in his typical unfunny way. He added sarcastically, "it's going to be 100 percent true and disgusting."
This is an obvious reference to Christine Blasey Ford's accusation of attempted rape against Kavanaugh. On the right, it's hardened into received wisdom that she made it all up in order to hurt him. In reality, of course, her testimony under oath was calm and absolutely no lies were discovered in it — while Kavanaugh lied repeatedly during his testimony in ways that were so obvious that multiple lies were turned into jokes and memes. (For instance, Kavanaugh repeatedly insisted he had never drank to excess, despite emails describing blackout drunken nights and being awarded "Beach Week Ralph Club Biggest Contributor" by his high school classmates.) In addition, Ford's testimony was corroborated by two other women who said they had similar encounters with Kavanaugh in college.
Want more Amanda Marcotte on politics? Subscribe to her newsletter Standing Room Only.
The attempts to pre-emptively disqualify any Black women became downright baroque on Fox News with one segment in which the supposed "news" anchors ran wild with speculation that Vice President Kamala Harris would be the nominee.
"So this person has to be a woman, she's got to be Black and she has to be younger," Fox News host Harris Faulkner said. "Anyone thinking what I'm thinking? They don't know what to do with Kamala Harris in the White House right now." Trump's former spokesperson Kayleigh McEnany immediately concurred, calling the theory "credible."
What's going on is not mysterious. The hosts know their audience has no knowledge of the multiple highly qualified candidates that are being circulated on media shortlists. Because the audience for Fox News can't name a single qualified Black female candidate, they assume that Biden himself is similarly ignorant — an assumption that the hosts at Fox News are shamelessly feeding. It's all part of the larger narrative insisting that any Black female nominee is inherently unsuitable.
RELATED: Coming Supreme Court battle: Moment of reckoning for Biden — and America
One way or another, what's clear is that right-wing media sees the upcoming Supreme Court battle as a golden opportunity to advance their already ridiculous narratives about how white men are being oppressed by women and people of color. On Fox News, this narrative has merged neatly with ideas drawn directly from neo-Nazis and other white nationalists. It really doesn't matter who the nominee is, or how qualified they are. Fox News will demonize this person to whip their audiences into a fascistic frenzy.
None of this is to say that Biden should break his promise to nominate a Black woman. Fox News has its narrative built in without even knowing who the nominee is. There is nothing Biden can say or do that will mollify them. Any nominee — even the blandest white guy — would be spun as a secret agent of antifa and Black Lives Matter and a communist plant. Biden should simply go forward with his promise. Let the Republican reaction expose them as the racist misogynists they are.
CONTINUE READING
Show less
Republican Doug Mastriano threatened a Pennsylvania county if they didn't do an election 'audit'
January 27, 2022
Pennsylvania state Sen. Doug Mastriano was outed Thursday after American Oversight requested 2020 election documents in the state that involved the Republican leader.
Mastriano, who is now running for governor, threatened Fulton County, PA, saying that if they refused to do an "audit" of their election then he would subpoena them.
As an avid supporter of Donald Trump, the GOP official followed what is being called the "big lie," that the ex-president had the election stolen from him.
American Oversight was following up on a report from the Washington Post that revealed that the Fulton County audit took place without any knowledge of the County Commissioner Paul Shives, who happens to be a Democrat. A firm involved in the Arizona sham audit, Wake Technology Services Inc, was also responsible for the Fulton County audit. They're not accredited by the U.S. Elections Assistance Commission, the report noted.
READ: Georgia GOP chair could face charges for signing ‘phony as a $3 bill’ slate of Trump electors
Fulton County, PA is notoriously red, with Trump winning the area by 85 percent, so it's unclear why the GOP is demanding so much be done to prove that there was no fraud when Trump won.
Text messages showed Shives and other commissioners noted that they were frustrated with being shut out of the election review. A message from elections director Patti Hess said that Mastriano told "all counties … to do this or be subpoena[ed] to prove votes."
Commission Chair Stuart Ulsh replied, "It was happening this way or in a subpoena."
Other records uncovered by American Oversight's Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request revealed, "on Nov. 12, 2020, Commissioner Randy Bunch, a vocal Trump supporter, emailed state Sen. Judy Ward, who had reportedly been working with Mastriano in Dec.
In the email Bunch said: "Sending this email to see what’s going on with this rigged election. … We can’t let this election get stolen if there is anything I can do please let me know."
They also noted that public records showed that the audit company co-founder emailed Bunch and Ulsh asking for their personal email addresses. Emails that aren't hosted on official networks are easier to hide from FOIA requests and any transparency or government accountability.
They also passed around emails about the Cyber Ninjas, doing the "audit" in Arizona noting that the company's CEO was supportive of the "Stop the Steal" movement.
After Wake Technology Services Inc conducted a forensic analysis of the electronic voting machines in Fulton those machines, like in Maricopa County, would be decertified. The cost for that wasn't allocated to the committee probing the election. So, they would need an addendum to pay anything exceeding $270,000.
The probe of the machines, which were leased by Dominion Voting Systems, was stopped at the last minute. Dominion explained that allowing an uncredited company look at the machines is a breach of their contract with the county. Republicans are still not clear on how much it would cost.
CONTINUE READING
Show less
'Fairly pathetic': Wisconsin Trump supporters duped by 'plain unconstitutional' effort to revoke Biden’s electoral votes
January 27, 2022
A right-wing publication has released a report perpetuating falsehoods about the 2020 presidential election and ecstatic Trump supporters are buying into the story. However, there's just one problem: the claim in the report never actually happened.
According to Buzzfeed, The Gateway Pundit's story, which was published on Tuesday, January 25, claimed the Wisconsin State Assembly had voted unanimously "to withdraw the state’s 10 electors" that President Joe Biden received following the election.
The report pointed to a bill sponsored by Rep. Timothy Ramthun (R-Wisc.), a right-wing lawmaker who has publicly supported former President Donald Trump's claims of election fraud. On Tuesday, Ramthun presented his bill "as a privileged resolution" that the Assembly will respond to. However, the bill was passed on to the Rules Committee and Rep. Jim Steineke (R-Wisc.) has made it clear the bill will go no further.
Shortly after Ramthun's attempt to present the bill, Steineke confirmed the bill would fall flat. “Not only is it illegal, it’s just plain unconstitutional,” he tweeted. “As chair of the Rules Committee, there is ZERO chance I will advance this illegal resolution. #EndofStory.”
Speaking to Buzzfeed, Rep. Mark Spreitzer (D-Wisc.) revealed Ramthun attempted to try another procedural tactic to obtain a vote on his bill after it was forwarded to the Rules Committee, but that effort also produced no results.
“I think the Ramthun supporters who were watching sort of missed the part where his resolution was already long gone and we were back onto the bill at hand. And they heard everybody say ‘Aye,’ and they're like, ‘Wow, we just passed the resolution,’” Spreitzer said. “But, no, we passed a totally unrelated bill that we started debating before Ramthun did all of this.”
Spreitzer pointed out while Republicans criticize Rahmthun's bill, they've also spent a substantial amount of money in support of election audits. In addition to conducting their own audit, they tapped a former justice whose beliefs align with theirs.
“They don't actually believe that the election was stolen, or that there was widespread fraud, and that's of course why they aren't going to support Ramthun. ... But they're absolutely fueling the very people who are behind Ramthun’s effort by their refusal to just come out and say, ‘We had a free and fair election. Joe Biden won. There was no widespread fraud.’ So they’re trying to have it both ways,” he said.
Spreitzer also noted that Ramthun's backers "think he did something pretty heroic."
“For those of us who understood what was going on, it was sort of a fairly pathetic gesture,” Spreitzer said, “but I think he managed to pull the wool over the eyes of his fan club, and they think that he really accomplished something.”
Although The Gateway Pundit's report has been updated, Buzzfeed notes that it still does not point out that there was never a unanimous vote for state electors to be withdrawn. Instead, there is a footnote at the bottom of the report that reads, “This post has been updated as we gathered more information from our many sources.”
CONTINUE READING
Show less
Copyright © 2022 Raw Story Media, Inc. PO Box 21050, Washington, D.C. 20009 | Masthead | Privacy Policy | For corrections or concerns, please email corrections@rawstory.com.
{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}