Enjoy good journalism?
… then let us make a small request. The COVID crisis has slashed advertising rates, and we need your help. Like you, we here at Raw Story believe in the power of progressive journalism. Raw Story readers power David Cay Johnston’s DCReport, which we've expanded to keep watch in Washington. We’ve exposed billionaire tax evasion and uncovered White House efforts to poison our water. We’ve revealed financial scams that prey on veterans, and legal efforts to harm workers exploited by abusive bosses. And unlike other news outlets, we’ve decided to make our original content free. But we need your support to do what we do.
Raw Story is independent. Unhinged from corporate overlords, we fight to ensure no one is forgotten.
We need your support in this difficult time. Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Invest with us. Make a one-time contribution to Raw Story Investigates, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click to donate by check.
Value Raw Story?
… then let us make a small request. The COVID crisis has slashed advertising rates, and we need your help. Like you, we believe in the power of progressive journalism — and we’re investing in investigative reporting as other publications give it the ax. Raw Story readers power David Cay Johnston’s DCReport, which we've expanded to keep watch in Washington. We’ve exposed billionaire tax evasion and uncovered White House efforts to poison our water. We’ve revealed financial scams that prey on veterans, and efforts to harm workers exploited by abusive bosses. We need your support to do what we do.
Raw Story is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Invest with us in the future. Make a one-time contribution to Raw Story Investigates, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you.
Fox News host Maria Bartiromo and former Trump administration official Stephen Miller worried over the weekend that Democrats will be in charge "forever" if voting rights are expanded or protected.
During an interview on Bartiromo's Sunday morning program, the Fox News host accused social media platforms of inflicting "cancel culture" on conservative voices.
Miller argued that Republicans should pass laws protecting Chrisitians on social media as soon as the party regains control of government.
"Yeah, will Republicans have the chance?" Bartiromo agreed. "That's the whole point of H.R. 1, Nancy Pelosi wanting to put this bill through so that Democrats are in charge forever or certainly decades. Your thoughts on election integrity and that Democrat [sic] H.R. 1 bill."
"It's a real sign of the threat to the health of our democracy," Miller opined. "When democracy faces risk, when democracy is imperilled, what you see happening instead is the party in power tries to change the rules of the game structurally to stay in power."
Miller argued that the voting rights bill is "a very dangerous path to go down."
"H.R. 1 is saying, now that we're in power, let's fundamentally change the rules of how elections are conducted to stay in power," he continued.
"Unbelievable," Bartiromo gasped.
"That's a very scary thing," Miller said. "And so if you care about democracy, you should all say with one voice, no, it is the right of every state in this union to set their own election rules as desired by their own citizens to protect the security and integrity of their own elections. That's fundamental!"
"It's all quite extraordinary," Bartiromo lamented.
Watch the video below from Fox News.
Reacting to Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA) encouraging protesters to stay on the streets and demand justice for Black Americans killed by police, Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-CO accused the Democrat of trying to "incite a riot" which led to a flood of commenters noting her part in the Jan 6th Capitol siege that had lawmakers fleeing for their lives.
According to Boebert, "Why is Maxine Waters traveling to a different state trying to incite a riot? What good can come from this?"
Twitter commenters were quick to remind Boebert of her tweets on Jan. 6thn that seemed to be directing insurrectionists as to where they could find House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA).
You can see some comments below:
@laurenboebert Like this? https://t.co/SQeQ3HdSnn— TheAtcoGhost🥶 (@TheAtcoGhost🥶)1618754502.0
@laurenboebert Why did @laurenboebert conspire with the Capitol Rioters by giving them a tour right before the… https://t.co/zGFgwNm90i— GaryAtty (@GaryAtty)1618754956.0
@laurenboebert Hey, Lauren is still tweeting the whereabouts of the members of congress she doesn't like.— Lonely Indiana Democrat (@Lonely Indiana Democrat)1618756596.0
@laurenboebert Difference between a protest and a riot. Hoping DOJ will be informing you soon, Mrs 1776— Lady Liberty says Wear a mask 😷🗽 (@Lady Liberty says Wear a mask 😷🗽)1618755269.0
@laurenboebert Why did you travel from Colorado to Washington D.C. to do the same thing on January 6th of this year… https://t.co/i06N51IDdC— parishkl 🏳️🌈🌊 (@parishkl 🏳️🌈🌊)1618756149.0
@laurenboebert Are you really going to try and use “riot” after what you helped do to the Capitol?? Get real.— Johnny AppleWeed (@Johnny AppleWeed)1618754816.0
@laurenboebert Another on the list of dumb fucking statements that sounded like a good idea in your head but your h… https://t.co/qDcvBoo9Zk— LumberJake (@LumberJake)1618755505.0
@laurenboebert No different than doing it on Twitter, Qbert.— Not SAYN Just SAYN (@Not SAYN Just SAYN)1618756073.0
@laurenboebert Why were you giving rioters the location of Speaker Pelosi on Jan 6, 2021?— Janice ThaBusy Bee (@Janice ThaBusy Bee)1618754629.0
@laurenboebert Says the woman who incited insurrection because her guy lost AND tweeted the location of duly electe… https://t.co/JBwqtU9o8V— DiscordiaIII (@DiscordiaIII)1618754834.0
@laurenboebert Why did Lauren Boebert tweet the location and movements of the Speaker of the House while Lauren's b… https://t.co/quCCAdDmou— Daniel Nicolae Dubei (@Daniel Nicolae Dubei)1618754645.0
@laurenboebert Oh, they're black. Now you're scared.— Rick Riley (@Rick Riley)1618756735.0
@laurenboebert Now do Kyle Rittenhouse https://t.co/1A4YPMWs8C— Shaka Smith (@Shaka Smith)1618755757.0
@laurenboebert Yes... inciting anything isn’t good... right Lauren? We will always remember January 6.— Tammy H (@Tammy H)1618754554.0
Republicans are having limited success turning the public against the Biden administration's $2 trillion infrastructure plan by claiming the proposal is too wide-ranging.
A new NPR poll shows solid support not only for the provisions relating to roads and bridges but also for spending on modernizing the electric grid, achieving universal broadband coverage and even expanding long-term health care.
Given the sweeping scope of the proposal, it is not possible for pollsters to ask about every component. I suspect there also would be high support for a portion of the plan that has received little attention.
That is the provision to strengthen the capacity of federal departments responsible for enforcing workplace protections.
The federal government [needs] the tools to ensure employers are providing workers with good jobs – including jobs with fair and equal pay, safe and healthy workplaces…
Biden is proposing that $10 billion be spent to beef up agencies such as the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and the Wage and Hour Division. The plan states:
"President Biden is calling on Congress to provide the federal government with the tools it needs to ensure employers are providing workers with good jobs – including jobs with fair and equal pay, safe and healthy workplaces, and workplaces free from racial, gender, and other forms of discrimination and harassment."
Before the Pandemic
It makes sense to push for improvements in job quality at the same time the country is striving to bring the number of jobs back to the levels seen before the arrival of Covid. Workplace abuses predated the pandemic. In some ways abuses worsened during the past year. Job safety waned in industries such as meatpacking especially. Such damage will be with us long after the health crisis abates.
Congress perennially fails to fund these agencies adequately, leaving them with insufficient numbers of inspectors and investigators.
For example, the most recent edition of the AFL-CIO's Death on the Job report notes that the number of workplace safety inspectors declined steadily during the Trump years both at federal and state levels. These staffing shortages create a form of de facto deregulation as many workplace abuses go undetected and unprosecuted.
Biden's plan briefly addresses another problem with workplace enforcement: artificially low penalty structures, especially at OSHA. The administration calls for increasing these penalties, but it does not provide specifics.
Not So Stiff Penalties
The penalty situation at OSHA is not as bad as it used to be. Changes made during the Obama administration, including 2015 legislation that extended inflation adjustments to workplace safety fines, helped raise penalty rates. The maximum for a serious violation is $13,653 and the maximum for a willful or repeated violation is $136,532.
These maximum amounts do not tell the full story. As the Death on the Job report points out, the average penalty for a serious violation in fiscal year 2019 was only $3,717. The average for willful violations was $59,373 and for repeat violations, it was $14,109. Even in cases involving fatalities, the median penalty was just $9,282.
The cumulative effect of low OSHA penalties can be seen in the data in Violation Tracker, which only includes fines of $5,000 or more. OSHA accounts for 37 percent of the cases in the database but less than 1 percent of the total penalty dollars. Numbers such as these cause too many employers to conclude that their bottom line is best served by skimping on workplace safety and paying the meager fines that may or may not be imposed by OSHA.
The Biden infrastructure plan could begin to change that.
Don't Sit on the Sidelines of History. Join Raw Story Investigates and Go Ad-Free. Support Honest Journalism.
$95 / year — Just $7.91/month
I want to Support More
$14.99 per month