Quantcast
Connect with us

2010 mid-term elections to be the costliest ever, group finds

Published

on

The US November mid-term elections are on track to be the costliest ever after controversial high court rulings opened the way for shadowy donors to flood key races with cash aimed at shaping the outcome.

“This will easily set spending records for US mid-term elections,” according to Dave Levinthal, spokesman for the independent Center for Responsive Politics that tracks the influence of money in US politics.

The center puts the price tag for this election cycle at about 3.4 billion dollars and rising, compared to 2.9 billion for the 2006 mid-terms, 2.2 billion for the 2006 mid-terms, and 1.6 billion for the mid-terms in 1998.

Analysts have given Republicans strong odds of gaining the 39 seats they need to retake the House of Representatives, and even a long shot at capturing the 10 seats they need to seize the Senate.

All 435 House of Representatives seats are up for grabs in the election, as are 37 of the 100 Senate seats and many key governorships.

ADVERTISEMENT

The cash totals include all money spent by Senate and House candidates, political parties, and independent interest groups, which have proliferated this year after a pair of US Supreme Court rulings lifted campaign finance curbs.

It’s all private money. Public funding is only available to US presidential candidates, and only if they agree to overall spending limits, as well as to defray costs tied to the two major parties’ nominating conventions.

US law sets some limits on how much an individual can give per election cycle: 2,400 dollars to a candidate, 30,400 dollars to a national party, and 5,000 to a nominally independent “political action committee” or PAC.

ADVERTISEMENT

But the US Supreme Court’s “Citizens United” decision in January and the “SpeechNow.org v. FEC” ruling in March have given corporations, labor unions, and advocacy groups a free hand to spend unlimited sums on independent campaigns for, or against, a given candidate.

The resulting “Super-PACS” can raise unlimited amounts from individuals, corporations, unions and other groups, and in some cases keep their donors entirely anonymous.

President Barack Obama’s Republican foes earlier this year defeated a Democratic bill that would have required naming major contributors, a direct response to the rulings by the most conservative US high court in decades.

ADVERTISEMENT

The result has been an unprecedented flood of cash from wealthy interests.

Last week Obama stepped up his attack on the flood of outside money, often from unidentifiable sources and much of it financing opposition Republicans.

“It could be the oil companies. It could be the insurance industry. It could be Wall Street. You don’t know.

ADVERTISEMENT

Their lips are sealed. The floodgates are open, though,” Obama said at a Democratic campaign rally in Maryland.

But Republicans maintain the court rulings reflect the US Constitution’s guarantee of freedom of speech.

Among the most prominent “Super-PACS” is a group called American Crossroads, founded by former president George W. Bush’s top political strategist, Karl Rove, and former senior Bush adviser Ed Gillespie.

ADVERTISEMENT

It plans to spend some 52 million dollars to help Republicans, has targeted 10 Senate races and plans “considerable” spending on House battles, spokesman Jonathan Collegio told AFP.

Campaign funding is the lifeblood of US politics, notably critical to buying costly television ads needed to boost name recognition, according to Matt Dickinson, a political scientist at elite Middlebury College in Vermont.

In the 2008 election cycle, the better-funded candidate won in about 93 percent of House and Senate races, Dickinson told AFP, adding: “Does it mean you can buy elections? I’m not sure you can go that far.”

ADVERTISEMENT

“Money buys access. If you’re a huge campaign donor and you want to bend your representative’s ear for an hour, and they open the books to find your a serious support, sure,” he said.

Among occupations, retirees have given the most in the 2010 cycle, with 98.5 million dollars spread roughly evenly between Democrats and Republicans, ahead of lawyers and law firms, who have favored Democrats with their 98 million, according to the Center for Responsive Politics.

Super-rich Americans can fund their own campaigns, as former professional wrestling executive Linda McMahon has done, pouring some 22 million dollars into her Senate bid in Connecticut.

ADVERTISEMENT

Democratic House and Senate candidates have raised a total of 362 million dollars and 229 million dollars, according to the Center for Responsive Politics, against 365 million and 239 million by Republicans.

The number two House Republican, Representative Eric Cantor, has raised the most, with nearly 4.7 million dollars, and leads the pack in candidate-to-candidate donations, according to the center.

Democratic Representative Vic Snyder was at the other end of the scale, raising just 347 dollars — but he is not seeking reelection.

ADVERTISEMENT

As of last week, Obama had leveraged his personal clout and scooped up some 67,285,000 dollars at 50 political fundraisers in 2010, according to records kept by CBS News.


Report typos and corrections to [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

The FBI believes Donald Trump and Hope Hicks discussed silencing Stormy Daniels with payments

Published

on

New court documents released from the Southern District of New York revealed that Hope Hicks and Donald Trump were both involved with the hush-money payments given to adult film star Stormy Daniels.

The information released were documents related to the search warrant for the campaign finance violations that former Trump fixer Michael Cohen pled guilty to. They were supposed to be fully unredacted, however, dozens of pages and names remain redacted.

"The government has effectively concluded its investigation of (1) who, besides Michael Cohen, was involved in and may be criminally liable for the two campaign finance violations to which Cohen pled guilty [redacted]; and (2) whether certain individuals, [redacted], made false statements gave false testimony or otherwise obstructed justice in connection with this investigation [redacted]," the documents revealed.

Continue Reading

Facebook

Shocking video: White man attacks black woman after traffic accident — then pulls a gun on her and bystanders

Published

on

A Lockport, New York man has been charged with throwing an African-American Muslim woman to the ground before drawing his gun and pointing it at her and others.

According to WBFO, Jeffrey Calhoun is being charged with attempted robbery in the first degree, menacing in the second degree and harassment in the second degree after the incident occurred during a small traffic incident. The entire encounter was captured on a cell phone video showing Calhoun fly into a rage.

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

Florida county GOP disinvites ex-Trump official from fundraiser because he criticized the president’s racist tweets

Published

on

Anthony Scaramucci, who had an infamously short career as President Donald Trump's director of White House communications, is now paying a price for calling out the president's racist tweets.

Politico reports that the Palm Beach County GOP has disinvited Scaramucci from speaking at its annual fundraising event because he criticized Trump's tweets telling four Democratic women of color to "go back" to the countries they came from even though all four are American citizens.

Continue Reading
 
 
 

Copyright © 2019 Raw Story Media, Inc. PO Box 21050, Washington, D.C. 20009 | Masthead | Privacy Policy | For corrections or concerns, please email [email protected]

Join Me. Try Raw Story Investigates for $1. Invest in Journalism. Escape Ads.
close-image