Quantcast
Connect with us

2010 mid-term elections to be the costliest ever, group finds

Published

on

The US November mid-term elections are on track to be the costliest ever after controversial high court rulings opened the way for shadowy donors to flood key races with cash aimed at shaping the outcome.

“This will easily set spending records for US mid-term elections,” according to Dave Levinthal, spokesman for the independent Center for Responsive Politics that tracks the influence of money in US politics.

ADVERTISEMENT

The center puts the price tag for this election cycle at about 3.4 billion dollars and rising, compared to 2.9 billion for the 2006 mid-terms, 2.2 billion for the 2006 mid-terms, and 1.6 billion for the mid-terms in 1998.

Analysts have given Republicans strong odds of gaining the 39 seats they need to retake the House of Representatives, and even a long shot at capturing the 10 seats they need to seize the Senate.

All 435 House of Representatives seats are up for grabs in the election, as are 37 of the 100 Senate seats and many key governorships.

The cash totals include all money spent by Senate and House candidates, political parties, and independent interest groups, which have proliferated this year after a pair of US Supreme Court rulings lifted campaign finance curbs.

ADVERTISEMENT

It’s all private money. Public funding is only available to US presidential candidates, and only if they agree to overall spending limits, as well as to defray costs tied to the two major parties’ nominating conventions.

US law sets some limits on how much an individual can give per election cycle: 2,400 dollars to a candidate, 30,400 dollars to a national party, and 5,000 to a nominally independent “political action committee” or PAC.

But the US Supreme Court’s “Citizens United” decision in January and the “SpeechNow.org v. FEC” ruling in March have given corporations, labor unions, and advocacy groups a free hand to spend unlimited sums on independent campaigns for, or against, a given candidate.

ADVERTISEMENT

The resulting “Super-PACS” can raise unlimited amounts from individuals, corporations, unions and other groups, and in some cases keep their donors entirely anonymous.

President Barack Obama’s Republican foes earlier this year defeated a Democratic bill that would have required naming major contributors, a direct response to the rulings by the most conservative US high court in decades.

The result has been an unprecedented flood of cash from wealthy interests.

ADVERTISEMENT

Last week Obama stepped up his attack on the flood of outside money, often from unidentifiable sources and much of it financing opposition Republicans.

“It could be the oil companies. It could be the insurance industry. It could be Wall Street. You don’t know.

Their lips are sealed. The floodgates are open, though,” Obama said at a Democratic campaign rally in Maryland.

ADVERTISEMENT

But Republicans maintain the court rulings reflect the US Constitution’s guarantee of freedom of speech.

Among the most prominent “Super-PACS” is a group called American Crossroads, founded by former president George W. Bush’s top political strategist, Karl Rove, and former senior Bush adviser Ed Gillespie.

It plans to spend some 52 million dollars to help Republicans, has targeted 10 Senate races and plans “considerable” spending on House battles, spokesman Jonathan Collegio told AFP.

Campaign funding is the lifeblood of US politics, notably critical to buying costly television ads needed to boost name recognition, according to Matt Dickinson, a political scientist at elite Middlebury College in Vermont.

ADVERTISEMENT

In the 2008 election cycle, the better-funded candidate won in about 93 percent of House and Senate races, Dickinson told AFP, adding: “Does it mean you can buy elections? I’m not sure you can go that far.”

“Money buys access. If you’re a huge campaign donor and you want to bend your representative’s ear for an hour, and they open the books to find your a serious support, sure,” he said.

Among occupations, retirees have given the most in the 2010 cycle, with 98.5 million dollars spread roughly evenly between Democrats and Republicans, ahead of lawyers and law firms, who have favored Democrats with their 98 million, according to the Center for Responsive Politics.

Super-rich Americans can fund their own campaigns, as former professional wrestling executive Linda McMahon has done, pouring some 22 million dollars into her Senate bid in Connecticut.

ADVERTISEMENT

Democratic House and Senate candidates have raised a total of 362 million dollars and 229 million dollars, according to the Center for Responsive Politics, against 365 million and 239 million by Republicans.

The number two House Republican, Representative Eric Cantor, has raised the most, with nearly 4.7 million dollars, and leads the pack in candidate-to-candidate donations, according to the center.

Democratic Representative Vic Snyder was at the other end of the scale, raising just 347 dollars — but he is not seeking reelection.

As of last week, Obama had leveraged his personal clout and scooped up some 67,285,000 dollars at 50 political fundraisers in 2010, according to records kept by CBS News.


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

‘Psychedelic Nazi’ arrested on AK-47 charges attended ‘Unite the Right’ in Charlottesville: report

Published

on

Federal authorities in Virginia arrested a far-right political activist who had attended the deadly "Unite the Right" rally in Charlottesville during which Heather Heyer was murdered in 2017.

Andrew "Thomasberg was arrested at his home in McLean on Thursday, according to court filings, accused of possessing guns as a drug user and illegally buying an AK-47 in 2017 for that friend, who is cooperating with authorities," The Washington Post reported Friday.

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Bill de Blasio learned of federal investigation — and suspended his 2020 bid the next day: report

Published

on

New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio announced on MSNBC's "Morning Joe" on Friday that he was ending his campaign for the Democratic Party presidential nomination.

There may have been more to the timing than previously reported.

"Federal election officials asked Mayor de Blasio for more information about his presidential campaign fundraising after he used a state political action committee to pay for expenses related to the bid – seemingly against the law," the New York Daily News reported Friday. "The Federal Election Commission demanded that de Blasio 2020 clarify a debt the campaign owed his NY Fairness PAC in a letter Thursday – the day before Hizzoner dropped out of the race."

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

White House Counsel busted working to keep whistleblower report from Congress: report

Published

on

President Donald Trump's White House counsel has reportedly been personally involved in keeping Congress from reviewing a whistleblowing report involving Ukraine.

"The revelation that Trump pushed Zelensky to pursue the Biden probe, which was first reported by The Wall Street Journal, represents the most detailed account so far of the president’s conduct that prompted a U.S. intelligence official to file a whistleblower action against the president," The Washington Post reported Friday. "The disclosure comes amid new details about the White House’s role in preventing Director of National Intelligence Joseph Maguire from complying with Congressional demands for the material in the complaint."

Continue Reading
 
 
Help Raw Story Investigate and Uncover Injustice. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1 and go ad-free.
close-image