Quantcast
Connect with us

Obama: Republicans refuse to listen to reason

Published

on

WASHINGTON — US President Barack Obama warned Congress on Monday that he would veto any legislative attempt to escape automatic cuts triggered by the failure to reach a long-term debt reduction deal.

“There’s still too many Republicans in Congress who have refused to listen to the voice of reason and compromise,” Obama said as lawmakers announced that efforts by a congressional supercommittee to reach a deal had failed.

The announcement confirmed widespread expectations that the 12-member panel would fail in its mission to cut US deficits by $1.2 trillion over 10 years amid partisan feuds over tax hikes for the rich and cuts to social spending.

Under the August law that begat the committee as part of a deal to extend the US borrowing limit, the deadlock calls for draconian automatic cuts to domestic programs and military spending come January 2013.

Lawmakers who believed the extended delay before the cuts come into force allowed plenty of time to repeal those cutbacks may have to think again after the president said he would block such a move.

“I will veto any effort to get rid of those automatic spending cuts to domestic and defense spending. There will be no easy off-ramps on this one,” Obama said.

ADVERTISEMENT

“The only way the spending cuts will not take place is if Congress gets back to work and agrees on a balanced plan to reduce the deficit by at least $1.2 trillion,” he said.

“That’s exactly what they need to do. That’s the job they promised to do. They’ve still got a year to figure it out.”

Obama held out hope for a new deal and reassured the markets by saying that despite a ballooning national debt in excess of $15 trillion, there was no imminent threat of the United States defaulting.

“Although Congress has not come to an agreement yet, nothing prevents them from coming up with the agreement in days ahead. They can still come together, around a balanced plan,” he said.

“I believe Democrats are prepared to do so. My expectation is that there will be some Republicans who are still interested in preventing the automatic cuts from taking place and, as I have said from the beginning, I stand ready and willing to work with anybody that’s ready to engage in that effort.”

Report typos and corrections to [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Here’s why Trump and Putin are only frenemies at this point

Published

on

President Trump’s campaign of “maximum pressure” on Iran has hit an obstacle: Russia.

While the United States insists that Iran shot down a U.S. surveillance drone in international airspace last week, Russia rejected the charge on Tuesday and supported Iran’s claim that the Global Hawk drone with a 116-foot wingspan was shot down over Iranian territory.

A top Russian official stated Moscow’s intelligence findings at a meeting with Secretary of State Mike Pompeo on Tuesday, according to Haaretz, the Israeli daily.

Continue Reading

2020 Election

How the GOP is embracing more ruthless power grabs in the face of huge political challenges

Published

on

On Thursday, the U.S. Supreme Court is expected to rule on two cases highlighting the collision between partisan power grabs and setting the ground rules for two of the most important elections in America—those for U.S. House and state legislative chambers.

This article was produced by Voting Booth, a project of the Independent Media Institute.

One ruling concerns whether the Trump administration can add a question to the 2020 census that asks if anyone residing in that address is not a U.S. citizen. The other concerns whether hyper-partisanship is unconstitutional when state legislatures run by a single party draw electoral districts to maximize their party’s likelihood of winning elections.

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

Hope Hicks may have implicated Jared Kushner in a coverup

Published

on

Former White House communications director Hope Hicks frustrated Democrats last week when she refused to answer multiple questions about her time in the White House.

However, Mother Jones' David Corn and Dan Friedman noticed one bit of Hicks's testimony that shines a negative light on Trump son-in-law Jared Kushner.

When asked about her false statement in December 2016 that there had been no contact between members of the Trump campaign and Russian government officials, Hicks said she consulted several top officials who worked for the campaign before making the statement, including Kellyanne Conway, Steve Bannon -- and Jared Kushner.

Continue Reading
 
 

Copyright © 2019 Raw Story Media, Inc. PO Box 21050, Washington, D.C. 20009 | Masthead | Privacy Policy | For corrections or concerns, please email [email protected]

I need your help.

The 2020 election needs you. There are 18 months until the election, and the Supreme Court is on the line. I'm trying to add journalists to do more exclusive reports. Let me get rid of the ads for you, and put your support toward 100% progressive reporting. Want to ensure your voice is heard? Join me and restore the power of hard-hitting progressive journalism.

HELP TAKE BACK AMERICA
close-link