Connect with us

U.S. weighs ‘non-lethal’ aid to Syria rebels



WASHINGTON — The United States is looking at delivering non-lethal aid to Syria’s rebels, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta said Wednesday, hinting at the first direct US assistance to forces seeking President Bashar al-Assad’s downfall.

While the United States is outraged at the killing of civilians it does not believe in taking “unilateral” military action and favors pursuing diplomacy to force Assad to step down, Panetta told the Senate Armed Services Committee.


Asked by Senator Richard Blumenthal if the United States was ready to deliver communications equipment to Syrian rebels, Panetta said: “I’d prefer to discuss that in a closed session but I can tell you that we’re considering an array of non-lethal assistance.”

His answer marked the first time President Barack Obama’s administration had suggested it was ready to provide direct assistance to Syria’s rebels, who are badly outgunned by the regime’s tanks and artillery.

The Pentagon chief’s comments came as UN humanitarian chief Valerie Amos said the Syrian protest city of Homs had been “completely devastated” and that the regime had prevented her from visiting opposition-held areas.

Panetta condemned the regime’s violent crackdown but expressed caution about military intervention, citing a lack of international consensus, a deeply divided resistance and the risk of fueling a civil war.


“We are reviewing all possible additional steps that can be taken with our international partners to support efforts to protect the Syrian people, end the violence, and ensure regional stability, including potential military options if necessary,” Panetta said.

“Although we will not rule out any future course of action, currently the administration is focusing on diplomatic and political approaches rather than a military intervention.”

Some Republican lawmakers, including Senator John McCain, have called for US air strikes to support the Syrian rebels and warned that time is of the essence to protect threatened civilians.


“Syria today is the scene of some of the worst state-sponsored violence since the Balkans,” McCain said at the hearing.

The “only realistic way” to stop Assad’s artillery and tanks is through “foreign air power,” he said.

Panetta, however, echoed Obama’s view that the situation was different than Libya, where a NATO-led coalition carried out a bombing campaign last year that helped topple Moamer Kadhafi’s regime.


In the case of Libya, there was strong support for intervention in the UN Security Council and within the Arab League, he said. But Russia and China have opposed punitive measures and the Arab League has stopped short of endorsing an air war over Syria.

Panetta also said the armed resistance in Syria was so fragmented that it was difficult to know who outside governments should recognize or contact, with roughly 100 groups identified as part of the opposition.

“It is not clear what constitutes the Syrian armed opposition — there has been no single unifying military alternative that can be recognized, appointed, or contacted.”


Resorting to military action could have the unintended effect of feeding a full-blown civil war, he said.

Syria’s Russian-made missiles and radars could pose a challenge for any air campaign, officials say, and the US military’s top officer, General Martin Dempsey, said air defenses in the country’s west are five times more powerful than Libya’s anti-aircraft weaponry.

Advocates of intervention, however, have cited a successful air strike — widely believed to be the work of Israel’s air force — that knocked out a secret nuclear reactor in Syria in 2007.

The American military role has so far been limited to sharing intelligence with regional partners, Dempsey said. “But should we be called on to help secure US interests in other ways, we will be ready,” he said.


“We maintain an agile regional and global posture. We have solid military relationships with every country on Syria’s borders,” said Dempsey, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

The military had prepared contingency plans for possible intervention at the request of the White House, but the president has not yet been briefed and a more detailed operational plan has yet to be drawn up, he said.

The military options include imposing a no-fly zone, naval “interdiction” and “limited aerial strikes,” he said.

Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Oil prices soar more than 10% after Saudi plant attacks



Oil prices surged more than 10 percent Monday after attacks on two Saudi Arabian plants that slashed output in the world's top producer by half, with Donald Trump blaming Iran and raising the possibility of a military strike on the country.

West Texas Intermediate jumped 10.68 percent to $60.71 and Brent climbed 11.77 percent to $67.31 in early Asia trading following the blasts at facilities run by state-owned giant Aramco.

The attack by Tehran-backed Huthi rebels in neighbouring Yemen, where a Saudi-led coalition is bogged down in a five-year war, effectively shut down six percent of the global oil supply.

Continue Reading


Trump used to play Elton John at ‘eardrum-rupturing decibels’ on campaign plane for a bizarre reason: AP reporter



MSNBC's Joe Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski mocked President Donald Trump's fixation on singer Elton John.

The rock legend reportedly rejected his longtime fan's invitation to perform at his January 2017 inauguration, and Trump has bitterly fixated on breaking John's attendance records at arenas where he holds campaign rallies.

"The saddest part of this story was when Donald Trump asked his staff members had anybody been writing about the Elton John attendance records that he supposedly broke," Scarborough said. "They said no, and he was angry and upset for days about that, also claiming that it was one more example of how, in the immortal words of Rodney Dangerfield, he don't get no respect."

Continue Reading


‘RIP GOP’: Polling expert predicts devastating Trump 2020 electoral wipeout



Democratic pollster and strategist Stanley Greenberg went on CNN Monday to explain why he believes President Donald Trump and the Republican Party are headed toward a historic and humiliating defeat in the 2020 elections.

In an interview with CNN's John Berman, Greenberg discussed his new book called "RIP GOP" in which he makes a case that Trump's presidency has shifted public opinion in Democrats' favor while repelling moderate voters from the Republican Party.

"I think what happened going into 2016 is Donald Trump took over the Tea Party base of the party, allied it with evangelicals and took the party to a very extreme end," he said. "I believe... Donald Trump's election will speed the defeat of the Republican Party because of its dominance by the Tea Party and evangelicals, which won't consider compromise, which won't consider a multicultural America in a part of our future. And I also thought it would speed up the resistance and also people's consciousness of what they believe and their values, and all of that has happened."

Continue Reading
Help Raw Story Uncover Injustice. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1. Go ad-free.