Liberian journalist Mae Azango’s courageous reporting on female genital mutilation in her country helped to ignite an international controversy.
But she had to go into hiding following threats and is now on a visit to the United States.
Her 8 March article, “Growing pains: Sande tradition of genital cutting threatens health of Liberian women”, prompted an immediate backlash.
Though it forced Liberian officials to declare that the traditional ritual of female genital mutilation should be stopped, police failed to help Azango when she began receiving threats of violence.
“I was doing hot stories on them so they were not happy with me,” Azango said during an interview at the New York offices of the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) last week.
Many Liberians evidently thought she “should have known better” than to report on such a controversial topic.
Asked why she did so, Azango said: “A lot of people don’t have a voice. If I don’t write about it, how will people know about it?”
She was enraged by the fact that children as young as three are subject to what is wrongly called female circumcision.
As many as two out of every three Liberian girls in 10 of Liberia’s 16 tribes are reported to be subject to the practice.
Along with threats of violence from the Sande, the Liberian community which carries put the procedure, even Azango’s own tenant threatened her.
Faced by apathy from the police, Azango fled into hiding with her nine-year-old daughter as international organisations – such as CPJ, Amnesty International and Reporters Without Borders – protested to the Liberian government.
It resulted in the information ministry releasing a statement saying it would guarantee Azango’s safety. But she believes these were superficial gestures.
“On the ground, Mae Azango is her own security,” she says. “My name is already there before I get somewhere.”
It means, she says, that she must be doing something right and that her stories are having an impact.
Azango intends to return to Liberia to continue her work. Before she left the country she says she told information minister Louis Brown: “Mr Minister, I’m going to America but I’m coming back. That gives you two weeks to clean up your backyard.”
[Liberian journalists Tetee Gabro and Mae Azango (right) via tlupic / Flickr]
Meghan McCain snaps at Sunny Hostin for daring to disagree with her about Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
Meghan McCain slammed President Donald Trump for hurling racist abuse at four Democratic congresswomen to heighten divisions in his rival party, and then framed the debate in the exact same way he has.
The conservative co-host on "The View" condemned the president's statements urging the four first-year lawmakers to return to their home countries as racist, and then complained that one of their chiefs of staff had accused moderate Democrats of turning a blind eye to racism.
"I think the politics of this is fascinating," McCain began. "We spent our entire week last week talking about how racist and xenophobic the original comments and the chants were, and I stand by that statement."
Here’s the insidious role Sean Hannity played in derailing Al Franken’s political career
The U.S. Senate lost one of its most prominent liberals when Sen. Al Franken of Minnesota, dogged by sexual harassment allegations, announced his resignation in December 2017. Some of Franken’s defenders believed the Democratic Party was too quick to throw him under the bus; other Democrats stressed that in light of the #MeToo movement, his resignation was absolutely necessary. Franken’s political downfall is the subject of an in-depth report by the New Yorker’s Jane Mayer, who describes — among many other things — the role that Fox News’ Sean Hannity played in the media firestorm.
The media got it wrong: There’s no evidence GOP support for Trump improved after his racist outburst
One of the most popular articles last week involved claims that polls showed Republicans had increased their support of President Trump. But a closer analysis of the data reveals that any increase in support was within the margin of error. So the polls couldn’t conclude that GOP support for President Trump had gone up or down.
Polls are tricky creatures. We either give them near god-like status, or discount them entirely, often depending on whether they show us what we want.
I remember the movie “Machete,” where an opportunistic Texas politician fakes his own shooting. Within five minutes of that story breaking, the news anchor reported that the politician had drastically improved his standing in the polls. Surveys don’t work that way.