Quantcast
Connect with us

Senators: ‘Enhanced interrogation techniques’ ineffective

Published

on

WASHINGTON — A US Senate report that analyzed millions of pages of intelligence records will show that enhanced interrogation techniques used by the CIA were not effective in helping find terror suspects, top lawmakers said Monday.

Senate Intelligence Committee chairwoman Dianne Feinstein and Senate Armed Services Committee chairman Carl Levin also said they were “deeply troubled” by a senior CIA operative’s claims that the harsh techniques used after 9/11 — and deemed torture by President Barack Obama’s administration — led to war-on-terror successes.

The Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, whose staff reviewed more than six million pages of documents, will “soon” complete a 5,000-page report providing “a detailed, factual description of how interrogation techniques were used, the conditions under which detainees were held, and the intelligence that was — or wasn’t — gained from the program,” the senators said in a statement.

Their comments appear to be prompted by the publication Monday of an in-depth account of CIA interrogation operations in the wake of the September 11, 2001 attacks in which author Jose Rodriguez, the former CIA deputy director for operations, defended waterboarding, a technique that simulates drowning.

Rodriguez also appeared on CBS show “60 Minutes” on Sunday, saying he had “no qualms” about engaging in measures that “went to the border of legality” because they helped save American lives.

“If there was going to be another attack against the US, we would have blood on our hands because we would not have been able to extract that information from” terror suspect Abu Zubaydah, who the CIA said was waterboarded some 83 times in August 2002.

ADVERTISEMENT

“So we started to talk about an alternative set of interrogation procedures.”

He argued that top terror suspect and 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, whom the CIA says was waterboarded 183 times in March 2003, spilled key information as a result of the methods.

“I think that the cumulative effect of waterboarding and sleep deprivation and everything else that was done eventually got to him,” Rodriguez said on “60 Minutes.”

But Feinstein and Levin said statements by Rodriguez and others about the role the CIA interrogation program had in locating Al-Qaeda founder Osama bin Laden, who was killed in a US military raid in Pakistan one year ago, “are inconsistent with CIA records.”

ADVERTISEMENT

“The suggestion that the operation was carried out based on information gained through the harsh treatment of CIA detainees is not only inaccurate, it trivializes the work of individuals across multiple US agencies that led to (bin Laden) and the eventual operation.”

The CIA used coercive interrogation methods on dozens of detainees in so-called black sites around the world, and Rodriguez and others have said that “original lead information” on bin Laden’s courier, which ultimately led to his location, came from those enhanced interrogations.

“This statement is wrong. The original information had no connection to CIA detainees,” the senators said, insisting that key intelligence on the courier came from “a variety of classified sources” and that such data will be detailed in the forthcoming report.

A source familiar with the report told AFP its completion was still “several weeks” away.

Report typos and corrections to [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

2020 Election

BUSTED: Trump super PAC accused of lying to government about the source of mysterious $325,000 donation

Published

on

According to a report from the Daily Beast's "Pay Dirt" investigative unit, a Super PAC affiliated with President Donald Trump has some explaining to do about a $375,000 donation that was wrongly attributed to one company -- but wire transfers tell a completely different story.

As the Beast notes, "The super PAC America First Action reported receiving a $325,000 contribution last year from a company called Global Energy Producers. But records released in federal court this week indicate that contribution came from an entirely different company," adding that the discrepancy was pointed out by the  Campaign Legal Center which labeled it a violation of federal campaign-finance laws.

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Senate delivers stinging bipartisan rebuke to Trump — and blocks Saudi arms sales

Published

on

The Trump White House suffered a stinging defeat on Thursday when a bipartisan coalition of lawmakers voted to block sales of American arms to Saudi Arabia.

The vote in favor of blocking the arms sales received affirmative votes from all Senate Democrats, as well as votes from Sens. Lindsey Graham (R-SC), Susan Collins (R-ME), Jerry Moran (R-KS), Lisa Murkowski (R-AK), Rand Paul (R-KY), Mike Lee (R-UT) and Todd Young (R-IN).

Graham, who is usually one of President Donald Trump's staunchest allies, said he voted for the bill because he believed the United States could not ignore the behavior of Saudi Crown Prince Mohammad Bin Salman, as well as the Saudi government's killing of journalist Jamal Khashoggi.

Continue Reading
 

2020 Election

Panicked GOP leaders scrambling to get Jeff Sessions to run for Senate so they won’t be saddled with Roy Moore

Published

on

According to a 2020 election analysis in the Washington Post, top Republican Senate leaders are cringing at the notion that former Alabama Supreme Court Justice Roy Moore could be their nominee for the seat currently being held by Democrat Sen. Doug Jones -- and are looking for a way out.

Continue Reading
 
 

Copyright © 2019 Raw Story Media, Inc. PO Box 21050, Washington, D.C. 20009 | Masthead | Privacy Policy | For corrections or concerns, please email [email protected]

I need your help.

Investigating Trump's henchmen is a full time job, and I'm trying to bring in new team members to do more exclusive reports. We have more stories coming you'll love. Join me and help restore the power of hard-hitting progressive journalism.

TAKE A LOOK
close-link

Investigating Trump is a full-time job, and I want to add new team members to do more exclusive reports. We have stories coming you'll love. Join me and go ad-free, while restoring the power of hard-hitting progressive journalism.

TAKE A LOOK
close-link