Recently on this site (see ‘The Stones of Constantine‘) I wrote about the way the culture, in books and movies, shuns original creation and plunders known properties from our shared past for inspiration instead, churning out new versions and remakes of everything from The Brady Bunch to Total Recall.
And I compared this activity to the way, in the later Roman Empire, the constructors of newer buildings and monuments had to complete them by using pieces pried off from older ones, since by their day the knowledge of how to execute the kind of architectural detail they wanted had died out.
A symptom of creative decadence in both cases, I suggested.
But really, just to be the Devil’s advocate here, isn’t the practice of re-imagining older literary and dramatic properties something that has always been going on?
Like the alchemical Dragon, devouring its own tail and eternally nourishing itself, don’t we derive creation from destruction? And isn’t that the way we make new gold out of old straw?
Shakespeare picked up his plots from other sources. Painters often re-do the pictures of other painters. The same songs are covered by different singers through the years. And so it goes.
The lack of creativity in the later Roman architects does imply decadence.
But maybe not– maybe they just wanted to recycle artistic and structural tropes that had become traditional.
The problem is that they had to do it that way. Their stonecutters no longer had the skill to copy the earlier forms.
The problem was, and is, a loss of creativity across the board.
It’s possible, of course, to put too much of a premium on originality for its own sake. The later Roman builders were inspired by the earlier ones. But then, what inspired the early ones?
They must have done what the best artists always do– make it up as they go along.
The problem of creative recycling is in what gets recycled.
And one of our problems is that we too have a disconnect with the sources of what we seek. That which is culturally shared among us is not literature, not David Copperfied or even the Bible.
It is the most infimal kind of crap, is what it is. It’s Scooby-Doo, or Bewitched, or, Lord help us, The Brady Bunch. We have people in the entertainment industry who are very skilled at interpreting this stuff– the problem isn’t with them; it’s with
the material they’re given to work with.
And why? Whoops, time to blame the Republicans again. They have a visceral suspicion and dislike of learning and educated people. They keep in the saddle by deliberately fostering an anti-intellectual climate where monetary gain is the only good. And their policies continually broaden this base.
We are reaping the consequences.
The other night I caught some of an old movie, Mogambo. A potboiler from 1953, it features a story in African locations. Actually it mostly features Clark Gable, Grace Kelly and Ava Gardner emoting in front of process screens of lions and crocs,
intercut with location footage.
Certainly no great picture. But…
I heard Ava Gardner lightly use the phrase, “like a bridegroom coming out of his chamber.”
Ava, or the scriptwriter, was casually quoting the 19th Psalm from the King James Bible.
In 1953, the Bible was part of the shared literary background. That throwaway quotation would have been recognized as a matter of course.
Today, fatuously self-satisfied in our dangerous ignorance, no one makes or recognizes a literary quotation. Even conservative Bible-thumpers actually don’t actually read the Bible all that much.
In fact, if there’s any book that today’s younger people comfortably refer back to, it would seem to be The Cat in the Hat. You see the costume at parties and raves.
We’re never dumber than when we think ourselves smart. We’re never more ignorant than when we assume that we’re wise.
[Stones of Constantine image via Shutterstock.com]
Wisconsin political professor shatters the biggest misconception about Trump’s base with a revealing poll
One of the most enduring ideas the general public, and especially Democrats, have about President Donald Trump's supporters is that they are bound by an unflappable, cult-like devotion to the president that transcends any sort of logic, reason, or reservations.
But in a lengthy thread on Twitter Tuesday, former University of Wisconsin-Madison professor and Marquette Law School Poll Director Charles Franklin revealed polling data that show this isn't quite true. There are plenty of solid Trump partisans — but voters supporting Trump are, on average, less attached to him than voters opposing Trump are repelled by him:
1st grader picked up and pointed loaded gun at fellow student – gun is part of program to prevent school shootings
Gun Belonged to School Official Who Is Also Student’s Grandmother
A Morrow County, Ohio first grade student was able to pick up and point a loaded gun at a fellow student, saying, “Put your hands behind your back your [sic] arrested,” according to The Columbus Dispatch. The gun was left unattended, possibly for as long as 30 minutes and belongs to Vicky Nelson, the first grade student’s grandmother who is also the school district’s transportation director.
Trump told NRA’s Wayne LaPierre he’s not ‘waffling’ anymore — background checks are off the table
President Donald Trump made a congratulatory phone call to National Rifle Association CEO Wayne LaPierre to let the far-right organization know that the White House was reversing itself and would not be supporting universal background checks for firearms sales.
Following shooting massacres in Gilroy, California, El Paso, Texas and Dayton, Ohio, Trump had argued the time was now for background checks.
"Republicans and Democrats must come together and get strong background checks," Trump argued. "Perhaps marrying this legislation with desperately needed immigration reform. We must have something good, if not GREAT, come out of these two tragic events!"