Quantcast
Connect with us

Two years after BP oil spill, disaster is far from over

Published

on

Two years after the worst maritime oil spill in history, fishermen, scientists, and environmentalists up and down the US Gulf Coast warn that the disaster may be far from over.

Dead dolphins keep washing up on shore in unprecedented numbers.

Oil-coated coral reefs are dying in the deepwater.

Eyeless shrimp and crabs with holes in their shells are showing up in relatively empty fishing nets while killifish, a minnow-like fish at the base of the food chain, show signs of chemical poisoning.

ADVERTISEMENT

And critics say offshore drilling safety and oversight remains woefully lacking.

“Politics continues to triumph over common sense. It’s outrageous that so little progress has been made to make offshore drilling safer,” said Jacqueline Savitz, senior campaign director at the environmental group Oceana.

“It’s not a matter of whether there will be another oil spill, but when.”

The April 20, 2010 explosion on the BP-leased Deepwater Horizon drilling rig killed 11 workers, blackened beaches in five US states and devastated the Gulf Coast’s tourism and fishing industries.

ADVERTISEMENT

It took 87 days to cap BP’s runaway well 5,000 feet (1,500 meters) below the surface that spewed some 4.9 million barrels (206 million gallons) of oil into the Gulf of Mexico.

In an attempt to keep the crude from Louisiana’s fragile coastal wetlands, BP sprayed chemical dispersants directly into the underwater gusher and onto the massive slick.

The dispersants — along with favorable winds and currents, oil-eating bacteria in the Gulf’s warm waters, the sheer distance of the well from the coast and a fleet of cleanup crews — kept most of the oil out of the marshes and limited, to an extent, the immediate environmental impact.

ADVERTISEMENT

Critics say however the dispersants made it harder to remove the oil from the ecosystem and created a dangerous chemical soup that was sent deeper into the food chain.

“The oil is still subsurface in the Gulf,” said Wilma Subra, a respected chemist and activist who has been testing seafood and sediment samples collected across the Gulf Coast.

“The oil is still present in the wetlands and estuaries and on the beaches. People are continuing to get exposed.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Despite BP’s public assertions that the Gulf is on the mend, Subra and other scientists insist it is far too soon to determine what the long-term environmental impacts will be.

“There are potential new impacts that we haven’t even seen yet, but just based on the impacts we have seen it’s going to be a long time before recovery sets in,” Subra said, adding that the effects of the spill could continue for “generations.”

BP has vowed to make residents of the Gulf “whole” and reimburse them for any “legitimate” economic damages.

ADVERTISEMENT

On Wednesday, it finalized a $7.8 billion settlement deal to settle thousands of claims from fishermen and others and has already paid out $6.3 billion to people and businesses who chose to sidestep the court process.

It has also pledged $1 billion to early restoration projects and will likely be required to spend more once a lengthy environmental impact study is concluded.

“From the beginning, BP stepped up to meet our obligations to the communities in the Gulf Coast region, and we’ve worked hard to deliver on that commitment for nearly two years,” BP chief Bob Dudley said in a statement.

“The proposed settlement represents significant progress toward resolving issues from the Deepwater Horizon accident and contributing further to economic and environmental restoration efforts along the Gulf Coast.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Theresa Dardar is among those who lives have been changed by the drilling disaster.

She lives in Bayou Pointe-au-Chien, a Native American fishing community on Louisiana’s Gulf Coast her family has called home for 300 years.

Dardar and her neighbors have watched their coastal lands get slowly swallowed by the sea after canals built by the oil companies brought salt water into freshwater marshes.

Now she fears that her family’s livelihood could disappear.

ADVERTISEMENT

“How are you going to make us whole if we lose our fishing industry?” she asked of BP. “I don’t think they can answer me,” Dardar told AFP.

That fear is echoed in coastal communities across the Gulf Coast.

“We’re suffering,” said George Barisich, president of the United Commercial Fisherman’s Association.

Despite the checks rolling in from BP, Barisich said some fishermen could still end up losing their homes.

Many were just getting their finances back on track after the devastation of Hurricane Katrina in 2005 when the BP spill closed a third of Gulf waters to fishing.

ADVERTISEMENT

While the waters may be open now with assurances that the seafood is safe to eat, prices are down, costs are up and the harvest has been disappointing.

A third generation fisherman from St Bernard Parish south of New Orleans, Barisich employed eight people and pulled in annual profits of up to $100,000 in the years leading up to the spill.

Last year he had two employees, and he lost $40,000. He blames BP.

[Photo of a dead fish laying on the sand with oil residue via AFP Photo/Joe Raedle]

ADVERTISEMENT


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Expect exodus of high-ranking Trump officials because they ‘no longer have anything to gain’ by staying: columnist

Published

on

Writing for the conservative Bulwark, columnist and author Robert Tracinski said Donald Trump's Syria debacle is likely the turning point for even the most hardened of his most avid defenders in the White House who will likely start leaving.

As Tracinski began, "Donald Trump’s betrayal of the Kurds is a moment that might be more important than it seems—one that is likely to have a far-reaching impact that goes well beyond what happens in Syria."

Continue Reading

Facebook

‘The world is on fire!’ Fox News pundit stunned after Trump decides to host G7 at his golf club

Published

on

Fox News politics editor Chris Stirewalt was stunned by the White House decision to host next year's G7 summit at a property owned by President Donald Trump.

White House acting chief of staff Mick Mulvaney announced the international gathering would be held at Trump's struggling Doral golf course in Florida, and even the conservative Stirewalt couldn't believe the decision.

"The idea that this administration, dealing with what this administration is dealing with, right? A lot -- the unraveling in Syria, you’ve got the march to impeachment here at home, breaking news story every day. The world is on fire. Why?"

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

Hosting the G-7 at Doral is still worth a million dollars to Trump — even if he donates all the profits: reporter

Published

on

President Donald Trump's chief of staff Mick Mulvaney said that holding the G7 summit at Trump's Doral resort would not be a profit for the president. Reports about it fly in the face of the White House claims, however.

The Miami Herald reported in July, when Trump floated the idea, that Doral is in a financial rut and the G7 meeting could help Trump climb out of it.

"Hosting foreign dignitaries has been a financial boon for Trump’s private Palm Beach Mar-a-Lago Club, providing some insight into what financial gains might be expected from hosting the G7 Summit at Trump Doral," said The Herald.

Continue Reading
 
 
Help Raw Story Uncover Injustice. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1 and go ad-free.
close-image