Quantcast
Connect with us

New Mexico state employee fired over medical marijuana

Published

on

A state employee in New Mexico, one of 16 states that allows doctors to recommend marijuana for medical uses, told local media that she was fired after a drug test revealed that she’d been following her doctor’s orders to treat post traumatic stress disorder.

The woman told local reporters she never came to work impaired and “was just looking for relief” from her symptoms. “I just wanted to be able to get up and live my life the way I used to.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Her co-workers at the State Personnel Office allegedly spotted her with red, watery eyes. Even though she claimed to have been up all night with a sick child, management asked her to take a drug test. She was fired when the results came in.

While she wasn’t named in the story, the woman may ultimately be forced to come forward if the state successfully challenges her unemployment benefits. Her attorney, Justin Pennington, said it was a clear case of medical discrimination and that he’s preparing to file a wrongful termination suit in response.

Uneven laws pertaining to medical marijuana have plagued many states since people began coming around on the issue of medical freedom. Even in California, many employers still test for marijuana, legal or not, and people lose their jobs. Same is true in Washington. And in Arizona, employers even have access to a database of all the state’s registered marijuana users, just to make sure nobody’s cheating.

Unfortunately for the nameless former New Mexico state employee, in most cases of termination over medical marijuana use, courts have almost always come down on the side of the employer. Added, New Mexico has “at will” employment laws, meaning her bosses could have given any reason or none whatsoever and still been in the clear.

This video was published by Eyewitness News 4 KOB in New Mexico on Monday, August 20, 2012.

ADVERTISEMENT


——

Photo: Medical marijuana via Andre Blais / Shutterstock.

ADVERTISEMENT

Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

The ‘War on Christmas’ was started more than 500 years ago — by Christians

Published

on

If it feels like the “War on Christmas” is getting really old, it is. Almost 15 years have passed since Bill O’Reilly first opened December with a segment called, “Christmas Under Siege”—ten long years in which his cadences and refrains and echoing chorus have become as familiar to most Americans as Handel’s Messiah. More familiar, in fact.

Not that O’Reilly invented the idea. During the 1920’s, Henry Ford’s newspaper published a series of anti-Semitic articles titled, “The International Jew: The World’s Foremost Problem.” Among the complaints:

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Surprise! IG report finds anti-Clinton bias at the FBI

Published

on

The Justice Department inspector general's report debunked President Donald Trump’s repeated claims that the FBI’s Russia probe was launched out of anti-Trump bias by FBI leaders. Conversely, it did find anti-Hillary Clinton bias among FBI agents.

Trump claimed for years that the FBI investigation was opened because of anti-Trump bias by FBI leaders, citing text messages sent between former top FBI counterintelligence agent Peter Strzok and former FBI lawyer Lisa Page that criticized him during the 2016 campaign. Inspector General Michael Horowitz concluded that neither Strzok nor Page were in a position to start an investigation into Trump’s campaign and concluded that the FBI probe was justified, refuting claims that the probe was opened because of bias by the FBI’s top officials.

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

Here are 5 huge lies Republicans are telling about the new report on the Russia probe

Published

on

Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz's new report on the origins of Crossfire Hurricane, commonly called the Russia investigation, blew up many of the right wing's favorite talking points and conspiracy theories about the FBI. At the same time, it exposed real failures of procedures meant to protect American citizens against undue surveillance and exposed the need for serious law enforcement reforms.

But most Republicans seem unfazed that the report undercuts President Donald Trump's repeated accusations of "treason" and a "witch hunt," and they show no genuine interest in pushing policy to generally make law enforcement more responsible. Instead, they're trying to pin the blame on the Obama administration and bias against Trump, even though these claims actually distract from the genuine problems uncovered.

Continue Reading