Quantcast
Connect with us

FBI director claims NSA spying could have prevented 9/11

Published

on

Robert Mueller dismisses congressional concerns and vows to take action against NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden

The FBI has shrugged off growing congressional anxiety over its surveillance of US citizens, claiming such programs could have foiled the 9-11 terrorist attacks and would prevent “another Boston”.

The FBI director, Robert Mueller, also revealed that US authorities would be taking action against whistleblower Edward Snowden for revealing the extent of its activities, confirming that the FBI and department of justice were taking “all necessary steps to hold the person responsible”.

ADVERTISEMENT

But Mueller’s testimony before the House judicial oversight committee brought angry responses from many congressmen, who questioned whether such surveillance was lawful and demanded to know why it had failed to prevent the Boston bombing if it were so effective.

In a frequently heated debate over balancing privacy and security, Mueller went further than other government officials in claiming that the collection of data on all American phone calls had become an essential part of counter-terrorism efforts and would make the US “exceptionally vulnerable” if watered down.

He also rejected calls from technology companies such as Google to disclose the scale of the programs, saying even this information could help terrorists seeking to hide their communications.

“If you narrow [the scope of surveillance], you narrow the dots and that might be the dot that prevents the next Boston,” said Mueller.

He described how Khalid al-Midhar, one of the 9-11 hijackers, had called a Yemeni safe house from a phone in San Diego shortly before the attack – a phone call that would have been intercepted and acted upon, claimed Mueller, had today’s surveillance system been in place.

ADVERTISEMENT

Not all committee members were convinced however, particularly in the light of acknowledged intelligence failures before the Boston attacks – when phone records were available. “I am not persuaded that makes it OK to collect every phone call,” said Democrat John Conyers.

Others questioned whether the FBI had acted lawfully in seeking to use section 215 of the Patriot Act to target all calls made in the US on the basis that they “might become relevant” to future terrorism investigations.

“A dragnet subpoena for every telephone record makes a mockery of the relevance standard under [section] 215,” said Democrat Jerrold Nadler. “If everything in the world is relevant, then the word has no meaning.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Jason Chaffetz, a Republican from Utah, questioned whether by collecting so-called “metadata” from call records, the FBI was contravening a recent legal test case that found that tracking a suspect’s movements without a warrant infringed fourth amendment rights to privacy under the constitution.

Mueller claimed basic telephone call records were not subject to fourth amendment protection under a 1979 Supreme court judgment, but declined to comment on whether they now included geo-location data, saying the “question had not occurred” to him and this “may or may not” amount to a form of call content.

ADVERTISEMENT

Republican Louis Gohmert also pushed back at the FBI, accusing it of over-classifying surveillance. But Mueller told him to “ask that question in a classified briefing” and said it would be dangerous to reveal the content of secret Fisa court judgments that approved such activities under section 215 of the Patriot Act.

This brought an angry response from Jim Sensenbrenner, one of the authors of the Patriot Act, who said: “My concern is there is no way for anyone whose records have been turned over to you to get the order quashed because they don’t know about it.”

But Mueller insisted that any disclosures of the extent of its surveillance activities risked harming national security.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Any tidbit of information that comes out” about how authorities track communications means terrorists “find ways around”, he said.

“Every time we have a leak like this and you follow it up and look at the intel afterwards [you find terrorists] are looking for ways around.. If we lose our ability to get their communications we are going to be exceptionally vulnerable”

The FBI director also claimed that such collection of electronic data had been a vital part of efforts track down Ibragim Todashev, a friend of the Boston bombers recently shot dead in Florida. He did not say whether phone or computer records used would have been available to the authorities without recourse to blanket collection of phone records, although it is highly likely a specific subpoena would have been granted in the wake of the attack, which killed three people.

© Guardian News and Media 2013

ADVERTISEMENT

Watch the video, broadcast by the Guardian on June 13.





Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Facebook

Virus outbreak in Houston-area nursing home kills 17

Published

on

A novel coronavirus outbreak at a Missouri City nursing home, outside of Houston, has killed 17 residents, according to data from state officials.

City officials issued a press release this week raising alarm over 19 deaths that they said occurred at the Paradigm at First Colony Nursing Home but nursing home officials told The Texas Tribune that the number is incorrect and declined to provide the correct number.

The city also reported that the facility has 24 infected staff members and the nursing home reported 11 currently infected residents who are in stable condition.

“This harrowing development speaks to the severity of this pandemic and how everyone needs to take it even more seriously,” said Missouri City Mayor Yolanda Ford of the outbreak in a Wednesday press release.

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

‘Gullible’ Trump administration paid up to $500 million too much for these ventilators: investigators

Published

on

Citing “evidence of fraud, waste, and abuse,” a congressional subcommittee investigating the federal government’s purchase of $646.7 million worth of Philips ventilators has asked the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General to launch its own investigation of the deal.

The House subcommittee launched its review after ProPublica stories in March and April showed how a U.S. subsidiary of Royal Philips N.V. received millions in federal tax dollars years ago to develop a low-cost ventilator for pandemics but didn’t deliver it. Instead, as the coronavirus began spreading around the globe and U.S. hospitals were desperate for more, Philips was selling commercial versions of the government-funded ventilator overseas from its Pennsylvania factory. Then in April, despite having not fulfilled the initial contract, the Dutch company struck a much more lucrative deal to sell the government 43,000 ventilators for four times the price.

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

Pastor slams Trump for lying about a ‘dystopian dreamscape’ if Biden wins: ‘Pandering to the worst level’

Published

on

As President Donald Trump loses ground with evangelicals realizing he's not actually a Christian, the right-wing has scrambled with the only strategy they have: try to claim Joe Biden, a devout Catholic, is somehow not a Christian.

"Nobody ever would ever even think possible because he's following the radical left agenda," said Trump in Ohio. "Take away your guns. Destroy your Second Amendment. No religion, no anything. Hurt the Bible. Hurt God. He's against God."

Continue Reading
 
 
You need honest news coverage. Help us deliver it. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1. Go ad-free.
close-image