By Kerry Grens
NEW YORK (Reuters Health) – Research so far has not found obvious advantages to minimally invasive surgery involving just one cut, according to a leading organization of women’s doctors.
Although single incision surgeries have become more popular in recent years, the evidence does not show they are any better for patients’ health than other minimally invasive procedures, said Dr. Jessica Shepherd, one of the authors of the report from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG).
“The one benefit that it does have is improved cosmesis,” or cosmetic appearance of the surgery site, said Shepherd, who is the director of minimally invasive gynecology at the University of Illinois Hospital and Health Sciences System in Chicago.
“Cosmetic benefit is still really important for women,” she told Reuters Health.
Single incisions can be used for a variety of procedures, including removing the fallopian tubes, uterus, uterine fibroids or other masses, repairing a protruding vagina and “tying” a woman’s fallopian tubes to prevent pregnancy.
It’s not clear just how often single incision procedures are performed, but Shepherd said their increased use prompted ACOG to review the evidence on whether they are any better than conventional approaches to minimally invasive surgery.
Minimally invasive surgery, also called laparoscopy, typically involves several small cuts.
“The thought is, if you have one incision the pain will be less and cosmesis is potentially much better,” said Dr. Ally Murji, a maternal-fetal medicine specialist at the University of Toronto and Mt. Sinai Hospital in Ontario, Canada.
But as the ACOG Committee on Gynecologic Practice found, there are very little data backing up the idea that women’s pain is reduced when surgery involves just one cut.
Two studies did find some reduction in pain among women who had single site surgery, compared to those who underwent a standard minimally invasive procedure, whereas two other studies did not find any differences in women’s reports of pain.
“The data that we do have from the pain aspect really (don’t) show that single incision laparoscopy is superior at this point in time compared to conventional laparoscopy. It’s probably equivalent,” said Murji, who did not participate in the ACOG report.
He said the ACOG committee, who published their report in Obstetrics & Gynecology, did a thorough job of assessing the single site technique.
One analysis by Murji and his colleagues earlier this year found that single incision surgery appears to be just as safe as surgeries with several incisions.
“The disadvantages (are) it’s technically much more challenging, and second is it does take more time than conventional laparoscopy, likely because it is more difficult to accomplish,” he told Reuters Health.
A third drawback to the technique, Murji added, is that it could cost more if surgical tools have to be modified – although Shepherd said the same instrumentation can be used and the cost should not be any different.
Shepherd’s group called for more research, particularly large studies comparing traditional minimally invasive surgery to single site operations.
In the meantime, having more surgical options available for women is a good thing, she said.
“We want to promote women knowing their options and being able to choose what’s available,” Shepherd said.
“I am optimistic and I’m encouraged that women have more of a choice,” he said.
“But I caution that just because we can do something through a single incision surgery doesn’t mean that we should be doing it. And we really have to see, is it beneficial before we begin offering it to everybody.”
SOURCE: http://bit.ly/15fR9fP Obstetrics & Gynecology, online July 23, 2013.
[Female doctor (Shutterstock)]
Trump hit with a brutal and hilarious backlash for hypocritically whining about Dem congresswomen using swear words
On Tuesday, President Donald Trump once again took to Twitter to rant about the "Squad" of Democratic congresswomen of color who he previously suggested should leave the country. This time, he complained, among other things, that they use obscene language:
.....shouting of the F...word, among many other terrible things, and the petrified Dems run for the hills. Why isn’t the House voting to rebuke the filthy and hate laced things they have said? Because they are the Radical Left, and the Democrats are afraid to take them on. Sad!
Trump scrambles to stop GOP from voting on House resolution calling him racist: ‘Republicans should not show weakness!’
President Donald Trump begged House Republicans not to join Democrats in condemning him for racist tweets against four congresswomen -- and stepped up his attacks on the first-year lawmakers.
House Democrats plan to vote Tuesday on a formal condemnation of the president for repeatedly telling the quartet of lawmakers to go back to their home countries, although only one was not born in the U.S. and has become an American citizen.
"Those Tweets were NOT Racist," Trump insisted. "I don’t have a Racist bone in my body! The so-called vote to be taken is a Democrat con game. Republicans should not show 'weakness' and fall into their trap."
Trump is ‘devoted to racial arson’ — and that’s why he took ‘a massive dump on the American dream’: Rick Wilson
Republican strategist Rick Wilson has penned a scathing column for the Daily Beast in which he dismantles President Donald Trump for telling four Democratic women of color to "go back" to their countries of origin, even though three of them were born in the United States.
Wilson begins his column by arguing that Trump has shown what happens when someone who is "devoted to political and racial arson" and is "beyond shame, reason, and dignity" gets elected to the most powerful office in the United States.