Quantcast
Connect with us

Paying for direct access to the pipe? Netflix-Comcast deal worries net neutrality advocates

Published

on

Netflix’s agreement to pay Internet giant Comcast for smoother delivery of its video-streaming service sets a precedent which could upend the model for who pays for online content.

The agreement, confirmed over the weekend by the companies, will see Netflix pay an undisclosed amount for “a more direct connection” too consumers using Comcast’s Internet service.

ADVERTISEMENT

Some analysts say this kind of deal threatens the model of “net neutrality” — or equal access for all kinds of online services — a concept enshrined in US regulatory policy until a court ruling last month invalidated most of the rules.

“For the first time in the cable industry’s history, a content provider will pay for direct access to the pipe,” said Kannan Venkateshwar, a Citi analyst, in a note to clients.

“This flips the traditional distribution model thus far whereby content has been paid by the pipe.”

The announcement came after reports that Comcast, the largest US cable and Internet provider, was slowing Netflix traffic, making it harder for viewers to see programs such as the hit series “House of Cards.”

It also comes after regulator the Federal Communications Commission announced that it would seek to rewrite its “Open Internet” rules in an effort to achieve many of the goals of the “net neutrality” principle, struck down by a federal appeals court.

ADVERTISEMENT

Earlier this month, Comcast announced a massive deal to acquire rival Time Warner Cable, which would boost its already dominant position in the United States.

– Comcast rivals may follow suit –

Youssef Squali at Cantor Fitzgerald said the Comcast-Netflix deal could set a precedent for other Internet and content providers.

ADVERTISEMENT

“We believe that this agreement is likely to precipitate others in the US and internationally,” Squali said in a research note.

This was confirmed on Monday by telecoms giant Verizon’s chief executive Lowell McAdam, who said his company was looking to follow Comcast’s model.

ADVERTISEMENT

“We are pleased to see that Netflix and Comcast had an arrangement,” McAdam told analysts.

“We will have to see what the details of that are but we have had discussions with Netflix ourselves and feel that the commercial markets can come to agreement on these to make sure that the investments keep flowing.”

John Bergmayer at the consumer activist group Public Knowledge said the news is troubling because it shows how Internet service providers can assert themselves as powerful gatekeepers.

ADVERTISEMENT

Bergmayer said the Internet and cable firms “should be in the business of charging their users for access to the Internet, not of charging the rest of the Internet for access to their users.”

Bergmayer added: “From what information is public, it appears that the largest ISPs are demanding payment from networks that deliver content and services that residential broadband consumers demand.

“Because the large residential ISPs themselves are the ones keeping the terms of their deals secret, it is raises the question of whether they have something to hide.”

– Netflix ‘paying its share’ –

ADVERTISEMENT

But Scott Cleland, a former White House telecom adviser now with consulting firm Precursor LLC, said news is positive because it helps distribute the cost of delivery to the Internet’s heaviest user.

“The Internet backbone is a very expensive high-tech infrastructure and Netflix has realized it needs to contribute to that cost recovery because it’s the Internet’s largest user in the United States, with 30 percent of traffic,” Cleland told AFP.

“Kudos to Netflix for stepping up to the plate and paying their share of costs.”

Everett Ehrlich, a senior fellow at the Progressive Policy Institute, said the deal reflects the unique position of Netflix, which as the largest streaming video service needs a robust delivery system.

ADVERTISEMENT

“This isn’t your grandfather’s Internet where academic researchers exchange papers,” Ehrlich told AFP.

“It’s now the medium for a far greater array of traffic. The good news is that the markets that govern interconnection work and were able to find a solution without government intervention.”

[Girl on laptop computer via Shutterstock]


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Latest Headlines

Former tennis coach sentenced to 6 months in college admissions scandal

Published

on

AUSTIN, Texas — Former University of Texas men’s tennis coach Michael Center was sentenced to six months in prison Monday for accepting $100,000 in 2015 to help the son of a Silicon Valley venture capitalist get into the school by falsely designating him as a skilled athlete worthy of a scholarship to play for Center’s nationally ranked program.Center, 55, received the sentence in a federal courtroom in Boston from U.S. Judge Richard Stearns, in whose court Center pleaded guilty last April to a single count of conspiracy to commit mail fraud and honest services mail fraud.Center is the 15th pe... (more…)

Continue Reading

Latest Headlines

Key California reservoir to be drained due to earthquake risk

Published

on

SAN JOSE, Calif. — In a dramatic decision that could significantly impact Silicon Valley’s water supply, federal dam regulators have ordered Anderson Reservoir, the largest reservoir in Santa Clara County, to be completely drained starting Oct. 1.The 240-foot earthen dam, built in 1950 and located east of Highway 101 between Morgan Hill and San Jose, poses too great of a risk of collapse during a major earthquake, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, which regulates dams, has concluded.“It is unacceptable to maintain the reservoir at an elevation higher than necessary when it can be reduc... (more…)

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

Critics of sweeping policy changes always make one huge mistake: Robert Reich

Published

on

In last Wednesday night’s Democratic debate, former South Bend mayor Pete Buttigieg charged that Senator Bernie Sanders’ policy proposals would cost $50 trillion. Holy Indiana.

Larry Summers, formerly chief White House economic advisor for Barack Obama, puts the price tag at $60 trillion. “We are in a kind of new era of radical proposal,” he told CNN.

Continue Reading
 
 
close-image