Quantcast
Connect with us

Rand Paul-affiliated lawyer now says NSA lawsuit not plagiarized

Published

on

UPDATED BELOW

Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul (R) has been caught once again using other people’s written work without attribution, this time in a lawsuit against the NSA that he jointly filed with Virginia’s ex-Attorney General, Ken Cuccinelli.

According to the Washington Post‘s Dana Milbank, the suit alleges that the National Security Agency’s domestic phone surveillance program is unconstitutional, but that neither Cuccinelli nor Paul did the bulk of the legal work on the suit. The majority of the suit’s verbiage was lifted verbatim from the work of former Reagan administration attorney Bruce Fein.

ADVERTISEMENT

Speaking through Mattie Fein, his ex-wife and spokesperson, Fein said, “I am aghast and shocked by Ken Cuccinelli’s behavior and his absolute knowledge that this entire complaint was the work product, intellectual property and legal genius of Bruce Fein. Ken Cuccinelli stole the suit.”

She continued by pointing out that Paul “already has one plagiarism issue, now has a lawyer who just takes another lawyer’s work product.”

Fein and Paul began work on the suit together in 2013, making public appearances together, Milbank said, in June. The case that Paul and Cuccinelli handed in to U.S. District Court in Washington, however, didn’t have Fein’s name listed anywhere.

Cuccinelli, who Milbank said “has never argued a case in that courthouse, and he isn’t even a member of the D.C. bar,” is grasping at relevance after losing the Virginia governor’s race in 2013 to longtime Democratic Party operative Terry McAuliffe. The arch conservative ran on a far-right platform that included more laws restricting women’s access to reproductive health care and abortions, and lost handily to McAuliffe.

ADVERTISEMENT

Fein is appalled, he said, that Paul would simply remove his name from a case he spent months working on and write in Cuccinelli’s. Fein produced a draft of the suit dated Jan. 15, which Milbank confirmed is an almost word-for-word copy of the one filed on Wednesday.

Paul has faced plagiarism accusations before when it came to light that several of his public appearances in the last few years have contained long passages of copy from Wikipedia and other uncredited sources. The freshman Senator responded belligerently at first, calling journalist Rachel Maddow a “hater” for pointing out the blatant copying and saying that the accusations “annoy the hell” out of him.

Then, as more and more instances of stolen writing began to pile up, Paul blamed his staff and offered to have all future speeches footnoted and annotated “so people will leave me the hell alone.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Top Paul aide Doug Stafford blasted Fein’s accusations, calling the charges ridiculous and accusing Fein of not being a team player.

“That is crazy and makes no sense if your interest is to work as part of the team. None,” Stafford wrote to Milbank via email.

Fein told the Post that he thinks Cuccinelli is an intellectual lightweight, calling him in one email “as dumb as a box of rocks.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Despite Cuccinelli’s assurances to reporters that Fein will be “brought in later” in the suit, it appears that Fein is washing his hands of the matter. In an email he wrote to Paul and shared with Milbank, Fein said, “I think this relationship is untenable.”

UPDATE: Bruce Fein came forward Thursday to dispute Milbank and the Post‘s version of events. MSNBC reported that Paul’s political action committee RANDPAC forwarded an email from Fein to journalists disavowing his ex-wife Mattie’s characterization of the situation.

“Mattie Lolavar was not speaking for me,” Fein wrote. “Her quotes were her own and did not represent my views. I was working on a legal team, and have been paid for my work.”

ADVERTISEMENT


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Trump polling close friends over whether he should fire Mulvaney: report

Published

on

President Donald Trump is considering firing Mick Mulvaney, his acting White House chief of staff and director of the Office of Management and Budget, The Atlantic reported Friday.

"Mick Mulvaney's job was in danger even before his disastrous press conference yesterday, and his equally disastrous attempt to walk that performance back," The Atlantic reported. "The fumble could not have been more poorly timed: According to multiple current and former White House officials, many of whom spoke on the condition of anonymity to relay private conversations, Trump has been steadily souring on Mulvaney for weeks."

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Michael Moore predicts Mick Mulvaney will get into Heaven after confessing Trump’s quid pro quo

Published

on

Academy Award-winning filmmaker Michael Moore predicted acting White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney will ascend to Heaven in the afterlife during a Friday interview on MSNBC's "The Beat" with Ari Melber.

The host played a clip of Mulvaney admitting Trump's quid pro quo while seeking foreign election assistance from Ukraine.

"This man obviously is going to be admitted into Heaven," Moore said. "You know, he told the truth."

"If there was a movie version of this, somebody stuck him with a needle just before he walked out onto the stage there, a truth serum needle, and he just went on and on saying, 'Yeah, that’s what we do. Yeah, of course.' Essentially admitting there is a quid pro quo. In fact, there are many quid pro quos."

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

Trump campaign has 12-person ‘War Room’ toiling to fight the impeachment inquiry: report

Published

on

While the White House has bragged about refusing to start a "war room" to deal with the impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump's administration, his campaign is footing the bill for a 12-person operation, the LA Times reported Friday.

“Some of you have criticized us for not having a war room — OK? — which we don’t by the way,” acting Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney told reporters.

“You don’t have a war room when you haven’t done anything wrong," he added.

By that logic, Trump's 2020 re-election campaign may fear the president did something wrong.

Continue Reading
 
 
Help Raw Story Uncover Injustice. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1 and go ad-free.
close-image