By Howard Schneider
WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Stanley Fischer’s nomination to be a member of the U.S. Federal Reserve’s board cleared a key procedural hurdle in the Senate on Tuesday, virtually assuring that the noted economist will join the central bank within days.
The Senate agreed 62-35 to limit debate on his board nomination, allowing for a final vote just after midday on Wednesday. A separate vote on his nomination to be vice chairman at the central bank has not yet been scheduled.
Fischer is widely expected to win Senate approval, both as a member of the Fed’s Board of Governors and as the central bank’s No. 2 official.
The arrival of Fischer, 70, will help bring the seven-member board back toward full strength after a period when its membership threatened to dip as low as three with the departure at the end of this month of Jeremy Stein.
If confirmed for a four-year term as vice chairman, as expected, Fischer would be in a pivotal position as the central bank approaches decisions about the end of its stimulus programs and when to begin raising interest rates after five years of historically loose monetary policy.
The vote on a second nominee, former top U.S. Treasury official Lael Brainard, has not been scheduled but is expected in time for her to be in place for the Fed’s next policy-setting session on June 17 and 18. Current Fed Governor Jerome Powell is also expected to be confirmed by then for a new term.
Stein’s departure will still leave two vacancies for President Barack Obama to fill, allowing him a further opportunity to leave his long-term mark on the agency responsible for setting the nation’s monetary policy. He has named all sitting members of the Washington-based board.
Fischer is considered one of the top economic minds of his generation, both for his academic work and for his policymaking. He was the No. 2 at the International Monetary Fund during the Asian economic crisis in the 1990s and was governor of the Bank of Israel through the global financial crisis a decade later.
Those experiences have made him a firm believer in activist central banking and the need for policymakers to be aggressive in trying to ensure financial stability.
“Since the Asian crisis and later when the critical importance of the financial system became so central, he has increasingly focused … on financial stability and the dangers of the buildup of systemic risks,” said Ratna Sahay, a top IMF official who served as one of Fischer’s advisers on Asia policy.
(The story corrects to show vote was related to board seat, not vice chairmanship.)
(Reporting by Howard Schneider; Editing by Paul Simao)
Republican’s latest anti-Schiff sign hilariously backfires
House Republicans have had a difficult time defending President Donald Trump and his actions on Ukraine. They've tried to pivot to attack the process and claim that somehow Democrats are stacking the deck against the GOP. Unfortunately, however, they can't even do that correctly.
After a lunch break, Republicans in the House Intelligence Committee propped up a sign reading, "Days since Adam Schiff followed the rules 0." That would mean that Chairman Adam Schiff (D-CA) is following the rules today. If Republicans meant to attack Schiff or claim that Democrats were ignoring the House rules it would read a larger number of days, for example, "4 days since Adam Schiff followed House rules."
Trump’s Syria withdrawal was an ‘intelligence and propaganda gift to Russia’: report
In a surprise move last month, President Trump withdrew a contingent of US troops from their posts in northeast Syria, sparking widespread outrage from observers who saw it as yet another betrayal of Kurdish factions who were fighting as allies of the US. According to a report from Business Insider this Thursday, Trump's decision not only undid years of US-led efforts to combat ISIS, it also was an "intelligence (and propaganda) gift to Russia."
Within days of the US withdrawal, Kremlin-funded propaganda outlets were broadcasting from America's abandoned bases in the region while "Russian and other hostile intelligence officials" were mining the facilities "for insights into Western intelligence," Business Insider reports.
Fiona Hill’s impeachment testimony serves as a warning about US election security and the 2020 race
During her bombshell impeachment testimony before members of the House Intelligence Committee on Thursday morning, foreign affairs expert Fiona Hill not only made a strong case for President Donald Trump’s impeachment — she also gave Americans plenty of reason to be concerned about U.S. election security and the 2020 presidential election. Former Special Counsel Robert Mueller, during his public testimony earlier this year, made it abundantly clear that the Russian government under President Vladimir Putin interfered in the 2016 U.S. election and will no doubt interfere in the United States’ 2020 election if it can — and Hill, a former National Security Council (NSC) senior director specializing in Russian and European affairs, gave Americans plenty of reasons to be concerned about next year’s election.