Quantcast
Connect with us

Oklahoma to pay $300,000 in legal fees after ‘preemptively’ banning Sharia law

Published

on

The state of Oklahoma has been ordered to pay more than $300,000 to the plaintiffs who sued after the “Save Our State Amendment” banning Sharia law was overwhelmingly approved by voters in 2010.

Defenders of the amendment claimed that it was intended to prevent Islamic Sharia law from being used in Oklahoma courtrooms. Muneer Awad, the director of the Oklahoma chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), claimed that a law specifically banning Sharia law would violate the First Amendment’s prohibition on the government favoring one religion over another.

ADVERTISEMENT

He argued that the “Save Our State Amendment” would prevent his will from being probated because it contained references to Islam and Islamic law, and the courts agreed with him.

The Oklahoma Legislature approved the constitutional amendment in 2010 and the statewide referendum garnered 70 percent of the vote later that year. Republican state Rep. Rex Duncan, who authored the resolution, described the proposed ban as a “preemptive strike” against Sharia law.

In November of 2010, a federal judge in Oklahoma City barred the amendment from going into effect, and in 2012, the U.S. Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the lower court’s injunction, claiming that “[w]hile the public has an interest in the will of the voters being carried out…the public has a more profound and long-term interest in upholding an individual’s constitutional rights.”

Now, U.S. District Judge Vicki Miles-LaGrange has ordered the state to pay the legal fees Muneer Awad accrued when he challenged the amendment’s constitutionality. One of his attorneys, Michael Salem, told The Oklahoman that the most absurd element of the case is that there was never any proof that Sharia law was taking root in Oklahoma.

“It created a solution where there was no problem that existed,” he said. “This was just politicians optimistically looking for an issue. Look what happened. Not only did the state question get struck down, but they’ll have to pay attorney fees and interest over three years.”

ADVERTISEMENT

State Rep. Clark Jolley (R-Edmond) expressed disappointment with the decision, but insisted that the real issue was the divide between the voters of Oklahoma and its judicial system.

“I think that’s a disagreement with us and the courts,” he said. “We passed that as a Legislature. We lost the lawsuit.”

Watch Awad discussing the lawsuit on The Rachel Maddow Show below.

ADVERTISEMENT

[“Human hands exchanging money” Shutterstock]

ADVERTISEMENT


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

President helped ‘increase anti-Trump turnout’ in red-state governor’s races — which could spell disaster for the GOP

Published

on

President Donald Trump was once the Republican Party's greatest asset in an election, mobilizing thousands of supporters to rush to the polls. Recently, however, it seems he's now driving anti-Trump votes up so much that it may no longer be worth the Trump trouble.

“So you’ve got to give me a big win, please,” Trump told a Louisiana crowd this week before the GOP candidate lost the governor's race in a red state.

“What Trump did in Louisiana was increase voter participation. While he increased the pro-Trump turnout, he also increased the anti-Trump turnout. That’s kind of the lesson here,” polling analyst Ron Faucheux told The Washington Post in an interview.

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Ambassador Sondland was updating Trump officials on progress of ‘push for investigations’ — including Mulvaney

Published

on

The Wall Street Journal obtained emails showing that ahead of President Donald Trump's call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, Ambassador Gordon Sondland was updating officials on the strive for investigations.

Chief of staff and Budget Director Mick Mulvaney was one of the main points of contact, and he replied to the email saying he would schedule the call with Zelensky.

“I talked to Zelensky just now. He is prepared to receive Potus’ call. Will assure him that he intends to run a fully transparent investigation and will ‘turn over every stone,’” Sondland wrote in an email on July 19.

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

White House desperately scheduling things for Trump to do so he won’t watch the impeachment hearings

Published

on

donald trump on the phone

Given President Donald Trump worked to intimidate witnesses in real-time during the hearings on the impeachment inquiry last week, the White House is desperately searching for something that can keep him busy.

Axios reported Sunday, the presidential daily schedule will be designed to keep the president distracted with their own counter-programming.

"Trump's schedule for the coming week shows him governing," Axios reported. He'll be promoting jobs and talking about things like "art and culture."

Continue Reading
 
 
Help Raw Story Uncover Injustice. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1 and go ad-free.
close-image